Literature DB >> 29766762

Typical visual-field locations enhance processing in object-selective channels of human occipital cortex.

Daniel Kaiser1, Radoslaw M Cichy1,2,3.   

Abstract

Natural environments consist of multiple objects, many of which repeatedly occupy similar locations within a scene. For example, hats are seen on people's heads, while shoes are most often seen close to the ground. Such positional regularities bias the distribution of objects across the visual field: hats are more often encountered in the upper visual field, while shoes are more often encountered in the lower visual field. Here we tested the hypothesis that typical visual field locations of objects facilitate cortical processing. We recorded functional MRI while participants viewed images of objects that were associated with upper or lower visual field locations. Using multivariate classification, we show that object information can be more successfully decoded from response patterns in object-selective lateral occipital cortex (LO) when the objects are presented in their typical location (e.g., shoe in the lower visual field) than when they are presented in an atypical location (e.g., shoe in the upper visual field). In a functional connectivity analysis, we relate this benefit to increased coupling between LO and early visual cortex, suggesting that typical object positioning facilitates information propagation across the visual hierarchy. Together these results suggest that object representations in occipital visual cortex are tuned to the structure of natural environments. This tuning may support object perception in spatially structured environments. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In the real world, objects appear in predictable spatial locations. Hats, commonly appearing on people's heads, often fall into the upper visual field. Shoes, mostly appearing on people's feet, often fall into the lower visual field. Here we used functional MRI to demonstrate that such regularities facilitate cortical processing: Objects encountered in their typical locations are coded more efficiently, which may allow us to effortlessly recognize objects in natural environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional connectivity; multivariate pattern analysis; object representations; real-world regularities; scene statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766762     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00229.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Real-world structure facilitates the rapid emergence of scene category information in visual brain signals.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Inferior Occipital Gyrus Is Organized along Common Gradients of Spatial and Face-Part Selectivity.

Authors:  Benjamin de Haas; Martin I Sereno; D Samuel Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Object representations in the human brain reflect the co-occurrence statistics of vision and language.

Authors:  Michael F Bonner; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Cortical sensitivity to natural scene structure.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Contextual and Spatial Associations Between Objects Interactively Modulate Visual Processing.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Cerebral cortex maldevelopment in syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Alexander T Wilson; Bianca K Den Ottelander; Marie-Lise C Van Veelen; Marjolein Hg Dremmen; John A Persing; Henri A Vrooman; Irene Mj Mathijssen; Robert C Tasker
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.864

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.