Literature DB >> 29766650

Social communication in bats.

Gloriana Chaverri1, Leonardo Ancillotto2, Danilo Russo2,3.   

Abstract

Bats represent one of the most diverse mammalian orders, not only in terms of species numbers, but also in their ecology and life histories. Many species are known to use ephemeral and/or unpredictable resources that require substantial investment to find and defend, and also engage in social interactions, thus requiring significant levels of social coordination. To accomplish these tasks, bats must be able to communicate; there is now substantial evidence that demonstrates the complexity of bat communication and the varied ways in which bats solve some of the problems associated with their unique life histories. However, while the study of communication in bats is rapidly growing, it still lags behind other taxa. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of communication in bats, from the reasons why they communicate to the diversity and application of different signal modalities. The most widespread form of communication is the transmission of a signaller's characteristics, such as species identity, sex, individual identity, group membership, social status and body condition, and because many species of bats can rely little on vision due to their nocturnal lifestyles, it is assumed that sound and olfaction are particularly important signalling modes. For example, research suggests that secretions from specialized glands, often in combination with urine and saliva, are responsible for species recognition in several species. These olfactory signals may also convey information about sex and colony membership. Olfaction may be used in combination with sound, particularly in species that emit constant frequency (CF) echolocation calls, to recognize conspecifics from heterospecifics, yet their simple structure and high frequency do not allow much information of individual identity to be conveyed over long distances. By contrast, social calls may encode a larger number of cues of individual identity, and their lower frequencies increase their range of detection. Social calls are also known to deter predators, repel competitors from foraging patches, attract group mates to roost sites, coordinate foraging activities, and are used during courtship. In addition to sound, visual displays such as wing flapping or hovering may be used during courtship, and swarming around roost sites may serve as a visual cue of roost location. However, visual communication in bats still remains a poorly studied signal modality. Finally, the most common form of tactile communication known in bats is social grooming, which may be used to signal reproductive condition, but also to facilitate and strengthen cooperative interactions. Overall, this review demonstrates the rapid advances made in the study of bat social communication during recent years, and also identifies topics that require further study, particularly those that may allow us to understand adaptation to rapidly changing environmental conditions.
© 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiroptera; behaviour; information; signals; sociality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766650     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  18 in total

1.  Evoked potential study of the inferior collicular response to constant frequency-frequency modulation (CF-FM) sounds in FM and CF-FM bats.

Authors:  Ziying Fu; Na Xu; Guimin Zhang; Dandan Zhou; Long Liu; Jia Tang; Philip Hung-Sun Jen; Qicai Chen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Behaviour, biology and evolution of vocal learning in bats.

Authors:  Sonja C Vernes; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Counteracting forces of introgressive hybridization and interspecific competition shape the morphological traits of cryptic Iberian Eptesicus bats.

Authors:  Pedro Horta; Helena Raposeira; Adrián Baños; Carlos Ibáñez; Orly Razgour; Hugo Rebelo; Javier Juste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Acoustic Context Modulates Natural Sound Discrimination in Auditory Cortex through Frequency-Specific Adaptation.

Authors:  Luciana López-Jury; Francisco García-Rosales; Eugenia González-Palomares; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarria
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Social structure and relatedness in the fringe-lipped bat (Trachops cirrhosus).

Authors:  Victoria Flores; Gerald G Carter; Tanja K Halczok; Gerald Kerth; Rachel A Page
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  A system for controlling vocal communication networks.

Authors:  J Rychen; D I Rodrigues; T Tomka; L Rüttimann; H Yamahachi; R H R Hahnloser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Levels of naturalism in social neuroscience research.

Authors:  Siqi Fan; Olga Dal Monte; Steve W C Chang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12

8.  Tests of hypotheses for group formation in the subtropical leaf-dwelling bat, Kerivoula furva.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Hsu; Mei-Ting Kao; Cheng-Han Chou; Hsi-Chi Cheng; Jian-Nan Liu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Social calls of Myotis nattereri during swarming: Call structure mirrors the different behavioral context.

Authors:  Philipp Schmidbauer; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural oscillations in the fronto-striatal network predict vocal output in bats.

Authors:  Kristin Weineck; Francisco García-Rosales; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.