K Smythe1, M Saw2, M Mak1, V W Wong2,3. 1. Department of Dietetics, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia. 2. South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, Australia. 3. Liverpool Diabetes Collaborative Research Unit, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to achieve optimal glycaemic control varies widely among individuals with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to explore the factors that are associated with optimal glycaemic control compared to suboptimal control. METHODS: An observational study design was used to explore the association of various factors with glycaemic control. Surveys were completed by individuals who attended the type 1 diabetes clinic at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Clinical and demographic information and attendance at dietary review were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and three individuals completed the survey. Those with optimal control [glycated haemoglobin ≤7.0% (53 mmol mol-1 )] had a significantly shorter mean (SD) duration of diabetes [10.1 (12.6) years versus 18.8 (12.8) years, P = 0.005), were less likely to omit basal and bolus insulin (18.2% versus 47.5%, P = 0.016; 36.4% versus 61.8%, P = 0.034, respectively), and were less likely to report low confidence in managing their diabetes (9.1% versus 35.4%, P = 0.017). Participants who were able to identify carbohydrate sources were significantly more likely to have attended dietary review in the past 12 months (60.5% versus 20.0%, P = 0.001). However, they were not more likely to have better glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified that consistency in taking insulin and confidence in self-management was associated with better glycaemic control. An association was also found between recent dietary review and better carbohydrate knowledge, although this did not translate into better glycaemic control. Future investigation into the application of carbohydrate knowledge is required.
BACKGROUND: The ability to achieve optimal glycaemic control varies widely among individuals with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to explore the factors that are associated with optimal glycaemic control compared to suboptimal control. METHODS: An observational study design was used to explore the association of various factors with glycaemic control. Surveys were completed by individuals who attended the type 1 diabetes clinic at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Clinical and demographic information and attendance at dietary review were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and three individuals completed the survey. Those with optimal control [glycated haemoglobin ≤7.0% (53 mmol mol-1 )] had a significantly shorter mean (SD) duration of diabetes [10.1 (12.6) years versus 18.8 (12.8) years, P = 0.005), were less likely to omit basal and bolus insulin (18.2% versus 47.5%, P = 0.016; 36.4% versus 61.8%, P = 0.034, respectively), and were less likely to report low confidence in managing their diabetes (9.1% versus 35.4%, P = 0.017). Participants who were able to identify carbohydrate sources were significantly more likely to have attended dietary review in the past 12 months (60.5% versus 20.0%, P = 0.001). However, they were not more likely to have better glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified that consistency in taking insulin and confidence in self-management was associated with better glycaemic control. An association was also found between recent dietary review and better carbohydrate knowledge, although this did not translate into better glycaemic control. Future investigation into the application of carbohydrate knowledge is required.