Literature DB >> 29766135

Joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) regarding the clinical use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA).

Megan Brenner1, Eileen M Bulger2, Debra G Perina3, Sharon Henry1, Christopher S Kang4, Michael F Rotondo5, Michael C Chang6, Leonard J Weireter7, Michael Coburn8, Robert J Winchell9, Ronald M Stewart10.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  aorta; endovascular; severe bleeding; trauma/critical care

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766135      PMCID: PMC5887776          DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open        ISSN: 2397-5776


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) provides a new tool in selected patients for the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage.1–3 Recent improvements in technology have facilitated more rapid placement through smaller femoral access sheaths, which may reduce access-related complications.4 However, high grade evidence to guide REBOA use is limited, and there is a substantial complication risk should this approach be used inappropriately.5 To address the current state of implementation of this new therapeutic strategy, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) has worked in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians to issue this joint policy statement which addresses the current practice relevant to patient indications, potential complications, implementation, patient management, and training of providers. We urge trauma centers to consider these factors in the adoption of this approach. No current, high-grade evidence clearly demonstrates REBOA improves outcomes or survival compared to standard treatment of severe hemorrhage.5–10 REBOA is less invasive than resuscitative thoracotomy and in skilled hands may be more rapidly applied as compared with resuscitative thoracotomy. Acute care surgeons can learn and safely perform REBOA after a formal training course.9 REBOA is currently standard practice for select patients at a small number of trauma centers where surgeons are immediately available for the management of REBOA.2 6 The major rate-limiting step to REBOA is the ability to safely and efficiently cannulate the common femoral artery (CFA) in a hypovolemic patient.5 10–12 If percutaneous cannulation is not possible, surgical cut down is required. REBOA is indicated for traumatic life-threatening hemorrhage below the diaphragm in patients in hemorrhagic shock who are unresponsive or transiently responsive to resuscitation. REBOA is indicated for patients arriving in arrest from injury due to presumed life-threatening hemorrhage below the diaphragm. No evidence exists for the recommended duration of arrest and use of REBOA but should be used within the same time period as would resuscitative thoracotomy. The balloon catheter may be inflated at the distal thoracic aorta (Zone 1) for control of severe intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal hemorrhage, or those with traumatic arrest. The balloon catheter may be inflated at the distal abdominal aorta (Zone 3) for patients with severe pelvic, junctional, or proximal lower extremity hemorrhage. Reported femoral access complications include arterial disruption, dissection, pseudoaneurysms, hematoma, thromboemboli, and extremity ischemia.5 10 These complications have resulted in patch repairs, complex arterial reconstructions, bypasses, limb ischemia, and amputations. Reported aortoiliac injuries include intimal tear, dissection, thrombosis, and rupture which may be fatal or cause limb loss. Balloon rupture may occur with over inflation of the balloon relative to the aortic diameter. Unintended inflation of the balloon in the iliac vessels may lead to rupture or thrombosis. Prolonged aortic occlusion alone may lead to fatal complications or spinal cord injury due to prolonged organ ischemia. REBOA protocols should be developed in conjunction with vascular surgery. REBOA should be performed by an acute care surgeon or an interventionalist (vascular surgeon or interventional radiologist) trained in REBOA. An acute care surgeon must be immediately available to definitively address the specific cause of hemorrhage to avert the dire complications of truncal and or spinal cord ischemia from prolonged aortic occlusion.10–12 Emergency medicine (EM) physicians with added certification in critical care (EMCC) trained in REBOA, may train and perform REBOA in conjunction with an acute care surgeon or vascular surgeon trained in REBOA, as long as the surgeon(s) is/are immediately available to definitively control the focused source of bleeding. EM physicians with documented significant experience and training with REBOA during military deployment may train and perform REBOA in conjunction with an acute care surgeon or vascular surgeon trained in REBOA, as long as the surgeon(s) is/are immediately available to definitively control the source of bleeding. EMCC-certified physicians trained in REBOA must not perform REBOA unless a surgeon is immediately available. EM physicians without critical care training should not perform REBOA. Due to the inability of prehospital providers to appropriately manage and troubleshoot the devices during transport, and the lack of evidence to support safe duration of aortic occlusion, transfer of patients with REBOA is not recommended. Thus, REBOA should not be placed in Emergency Departments in institutions where the patient cannot receive definitive surgical care and hemostasis at that same institution.

Management of the patient with REBOA

There are no rigorous clinical data to guide absolute duration of full or partial aortic occlusion. However, the following guidelines are current best practice: REBOA in Zone 1 should only be performed if the anticipated time to start of operation is less than 15 min. REBOA in Zone 3 may be tolerated for longer periods of time and as such may be used as an immediate adjunctive bleeding control prior to angioembolization, preperitoneal packing or exploration. Once Zone 3 aortic occlusion has been performed, urgent operative or interventional hemostasis should occur, and the balloon deflated as soon as possible. Partial balloon inflation at either location may prolong this interval; however, this is not well studied. Furthermore, this can result in distal migration of the balloon catheter which may cause intimal injury if the balloon is not completely deflated or is reinflated in the iliac vessels. The balloon should be deflated as soon as possible, and the catheter and sheath removed as soon as possible. Vigilant assessment of lower extremity perfusion must occur before, during, after aortic occlusion, and after sheath removal. This monitoring must continue for at least 24 hours. If the patient leaves the OR/interventional suite with the sheath in place, demonstration of adequate extremity perfusion by angiography is recommended. Vascular surgery colleagues should participate in the assessment of distal perfusion and management and removal of the sheath. Military surgeons who act as general or trauma surgeons during deployment should complete a formal training course (Basic Endovascular Skills for Trauma (BEST Course®)) and include REBOA in their skill set. Military EM physicians who work on a team with acute care surgeons during deployment must complete formal training (BEST Course®) and may include REBOA in their skill set. REBOA must be performed in conjunction with an acute care surgeon.8 The ability to analyze which patient may benefit from a REBOA is more difficult in austere environments, and careful attention must be paid to patient selection and immediate availability of operative resources.8 Formal, basic training consists of completion of the ACS COT BEST Course®. Proficiency in ultrasound-guided and open, cut-down cannulation of the CFA is a critical skill required for REBOA. Each institution and department is responsible for determining qualifications and permitting providers to perform REBOA. Leadership from vascular surgery, acute care surgery, and EM must establish institution-specific guidelines for integration of REBOA into clinical practice, including training, credentialing and guidelines for insertion and monitoring. REBOA will be uncommon in most settings. As such and given that the benefits of REBOA are as yet unproven, patient safety and performance improvement are critically necessary components of a REBOA program. After initial training, there should be an ongoing competency program, either through simulation or cadaver labs, attendance at a BEST Course® or Workshop, or completion of the ASSET™ Course ‘Introduction to REBOA Module’. There should also be a strong quality management program at each institution evaluating (1) each placement for appropriateness and complications to maximize patient safety and (2) availability and timeliness of definitive surgical or angioembolic control of bleeding following REBOA. All REBOA procedures should be coded according to the 2017 NTDS Data Dictionary ICD-10 Hospital Procedures: REBOA, ICD-10 04L03DZ. Any institution performing REBOA should enroll patients in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, multi-institutional Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery trial: http://www.aast.org/Research/MultiInstitutionalStudies.aspx.

Quality assurance, maintenance of competence, performance improvement and patient safety

These guidelines are based on published data, best evidence, and expert opinion.1–12
  12 in total

1.  The AAST prospective Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry: Data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA).

Authors:  Joseph J DuBose; Thomas M Scalea; Megan Brenner; Dimitra Skiada; Kenji Inaba; Jeremy Cannon; Laura Moore; John Holcomb; David Turay; Cassra N Arbabi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; James Xiao; David Skarupa; Nathaniel Poulin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Survival of severe blunt trauma patients treated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta compared with propensity score-adjusted untreated patients.

Authors:  Tatsuya Norii; Cameron Crandall; Yusuke Terasaka
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 3.  The pitfalls of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Risk factors and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Anders J Davidson; Rachel M Russo; Viktor A Reva; Megan L Brenner; Laura J Moore; Chad Ball; Eileen Bulger; Charles J Fox; Joseph J DuBose; Ernest E Moore; Todd E Rasmussen
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  Basic endovascular skills for trauma course: bridging the gap between endovascular techniques and the acute care surgeon.

Authors:  Megan Brenner; Melanie Hoehn; Jason Pasley; Joseph Dubose; Deborah Stein; Thomas Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Laura J Moore; Megan Brenner; Rosemary A Kozar; Jason Pasley; Charles E Wade; Mary S Baraniuk; Thomas Scalea; John B Holcomb
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might be dangerous in patients with severe torso trauma: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Junichi Inoue; Atsushi Shiraishi; Ayako Yoshiyuki; Koichi Haruta; Hiroki Matsui; Yasuhiro Otomo
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Time to aortic occlusion: It's all about access.

Authors:  Anna Romagnoli; William Teeter; Jason Pasley; Peter Hu; Melanie Hoehn; Deborah Stein; Thomas Scalea; Megan Brenner
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Proximal Aortic Control in Patients With Severe Hemorrhage and Arrest.

Authors:  Megan Brenner; William Teeter; Melanie Hoehn; Jason Pasley; Peter Hu; Shiming Yang; Anna Romagnoli; Jose Diaz; Deborah Stein; Thomas Scalea
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  REBOA: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Jay Doucet; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
View more
  38 in total

1.  Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: Assessing Need in an Urban Trauma Center.

Authors:  Ryan P Dumas; Daniel N Holena; Brian P Smith; Daniel Jafari; Mark J Seamon; Patrick M Reilly; Zaffer Qasim; Jeremy W Cannon
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Nationwide Analysis of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Civilian Trauma.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; Muhammad Zeeshan; Joseph V Sakran; Mohammad Hamidi; Narong Kulvatunyou; Muhammad Khan; Terence O'Keeffe; Peter Rhee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Could resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta improve survival among severely injured patients with post-intubation hypotension?

Authors:  Ramiro Manzano-Nunez; Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar; Joseph DuBose; Tal Hörer; Samuel Galvagno; Claudia Patricia Orlas; Michael W Parra; Federico Coccolini; Massimo Sartelli; Juan Camilo Falla-Martinez; Alberto Federico García; Julian Chica; Maria Paula Naranjo; Alvaro Ignacio Sanchez; Camilo Jose Salazar; Luis Eduardo Calderón-Tapia; Valeria Lopez-Castilla; Paula Ferrada; Ernest E Moore; Carlos A Ordonez
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  The resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta (REBOA) device-what radiologists need to know.

Authors:  Linzi Arndt; Danial Mir; Johnathan Nguyen; Nariman Nezami; Sean R Dariushnia; Laura K Findeiss; Adam Prater; Derek L West; Bill S Majdalany; Nima Kokabi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 5.  A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care.

Authors:  Suzanne M Vrancken; Boudewijn L S Borger van der Burg; Paul J E M Vrancken; Gert-Aldert H Kock; Todd E Rasmussen; Rigo Hoencamp
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Hate to Burst Your Balloon: Successful REBOA Use Takes More Than a Course.

Authors:  Christina M Theodorou; Edgardo S Salcedo; Joseph J DuBose; Joseph M Galante
Journal:  J Endovasc Resusc Trauma Manag       Date:  2020

7.  Emergency Department Thoracotomy: Development of a Reliable, Validated Checklist for Procedural Training.

Authors:  Hashim Q Zaidi; Sarah S Dhake; Danielle T Miller; Priyanka Sista; Matthew J Pirotte; Abra L Fant; David H Salzman
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  CT of Penetrating Abdominopelvic Trauma.

Authors:  Muhammad Naeem; Mark J Hoegger; Frank W Petraglia; David H Ballard; Maria Zulfiqar; Michael N Patlas; Constantine Raptis; Vincent M Mellnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Mortality in hypotensive trauma patients requiring laparotomy is related to degree of hypotension and provides evidence for focused interventions.

Authors:  James W Davis; Rachel C Dirks; David R Jeffcoach; Krista L Kaups; Lawrence P Sue; Jordan T Lilienstein; Mary M Wolfe; Amy M Kwok
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-06-17

10.  Safe balloon inflation parameters for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Authors:  Kaspars Maleckis; Courtney Keiser; Majid Jadidi; Eric Anttila; Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.697

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.