| Literature DB >> 29765504 |
Ştefania Silvia Balea1, Alina Elena Pârvu2, Nastasia Pop1, Fernando Zamora Marín3, Marcel Pârvu4.
Abstract
Grape pomace is a potential source of natural antioxidant agents. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant and cardioprotective properties of fresh and fermented pomace extracts obtained from Vitis vinifera L. red variety Fetească neagră grown in Romania in 2015 were investigated. Grape pomace extracts total phenolic index, total tannins, total anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, flavan-3-ol monomers, stilbenes, and DPPH free radical scavenger were measured. The effect of a seven-day pretreatment with grape pomace extracts on the isoprenaline-induced infarct-like lesion in rats was assessed by ECG monitoring, serum levels of creatine kinase, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase. Total serum oxidative status, total antioxidant response, oxidative stress index, malondialdehyde, total thiols, and nitric oxide have been also assessed. Higher phenolic content and antioxidant activity were found in fermented pomace extracts when compared to fresh pomace extracts. Pretreatment with grape pomace extracts significantly improved cardiac and oxidative stress parameters. In conclusion, Fetească neagră pomace extracts had a good in vitro antioxidant activity due to an important phenolic content. In vivo, the extracts had cardioprotective effects against isoprenaline-induced infarct-like lesion by reducing oxidative stress, fresh pomace extracts having a better effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29765504 PMCID: PMC5885407 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8194721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Phytochemical analysis of grape pomace from cv. Fetească neagră 2015.
| GP | TPI | TC | TAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNFs | 114.71 ± 15.86 | 63.15 ± 7.12 | 184.84 ± 17.13∗∗∗ | |
| FNFr | 161.58 ± 3.42∗∗ | 113.98 ± 4.39∗∗∗ | 47.67 ± 5.0 | |
|
| ||||
| Proanthocyanidins | mDP | PD% | G% | |
|
| ||||
| FNFs | 25.57 ± 3.82 | 6.29 ± 0.16n.s. | 8.18 ± 0.49∗∗ | 19.93 ± 0.41 |
| FNFr | 28.71 ± 9.78∗ | 5.64 ± 1.33 | 3.91 ± 1.12 | 21.69 ± 1.50n.s. |
|
| ||||
| ∑ flavan-3-ol monomers | (+)-catechin | (−)-epicatechin | epicatechin-3-O-gallate | |
|
| ||||
| FNFs | 2.05 ± 0.21 | 1.12 ± 0.10 | 0.87 ± 0.09 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| FNFr | 4.71 ± 0.17∗∗ | 2.59 ± 0.01∗∗ | 2.05 ± 0.16∗∗ | 0.07 ± 0.00n.s. |
|
| ||||
| Transresveratrol | cis-resveratrol ( | Transpiceid | cis-Piceid | |
|
| ||||
| FNFs | 3.22 ± 1.91∗∗ | 5.03 ± 1.09 | 53.54 ± 10.53∗∗ | 33.04 ± 8.14∗∗ |
| FNFr | 0.58 ± 1.01 | 12.27 ± 3.07∗∗ | 14.31 ± 2.25 | 7.67 ± 1.99 |
Values are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 3) n.s.p > 0.05, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. GP: grape pomace; Fs: fresh; Fr: fermented; FN: Fetească neagră; TPI: total phenolic index; TC: tannins concentration; TAC: total anthocyanin content; mDP: mean degree of polymerization; PD: prodelphinidins; G%: galloylation.
RR interval, QT interval, QTc, heart rate, and ST segment of rats, day 10 ECG.
| RR (ms) | QT (ms) | QTc (ms) | HR (bpm) | ST (mV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | 238 ± 22.80 | 80 ± 14.14 | 198 ± 36.33 | 213.31 ± 22.18 | 00 |
| ISO | 256∗ ± 21.90 | 136∗∗ ± 16.73 | 274∗∗ ± 43.35 | 195.71n.s. ± 19.55 | 0.64∗∗ ± 0.01 |
| FNFs | 224# ± 21.90 | 120# ± 14.14 | 254∗ ± 19.49 | 269.79# ± 24.80 | 0.12## ± 0.01 |
| FNFr | 228# ± 22.80 | 136n.s. ± 35.77 | 268n.s. ± 45.11 | 265.24# ± 26.17 | 0.11## ± 0.01 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 versus control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 versus ISO group. GP: grape pomace; Fs: fresh; Fr: fermented; FN: Fetească neagră; ISO: isoprenaline; QTc: corrected QT interval; HR: heart rate.
Figure 1Fetească neagră grape pomace radical scavenging activity toward DPPH. Fs: fresh, Fr: fermented, FN: Fetească neagră, RSA: radical scavenging activity.
Figure 2Chart records showing the effect of Fetească neagră grape pomace fresh extract (FNFs) and Fetească neagră grape pomace-fermented extract (FNFr) pretreatments on ECG tracings: (a) normal control, (b) isoproterenol (ISO), (c) FNFs, and (d) FNFr. The electrocardiogram was recorded from limb leads II in each group. The sensitivity was 1 mV, and the chart speed was 50 mm/sec.
Serum cardiac marker enzymes.
| AST (UI/L) | ALT (UI/L) | CK-MB (UI/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | 51.36 ± 7.04 | 47.27 ± 3.17 | 213.10 ± 46.48 |
| ISO | 131.50∗∗∗ ± 20.72 | 113.27∗∗∗ ± 13.17 | 562.50∗∗∗ ± 105.20 |
| FNFs | 98.52## ± 8.18 | 86.00## ± 8.14 | 375.30## ± 33.61 |
| FNFr | 103.73# ± 9.34 | 86.74## ± 5.59 | 295.20## ± 66.49 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus control; #p < 0.05. ##p < 0.01 versus ISO group. AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine transaminase; CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; Fs: fresh; Fr: fermented; FN: Fetească neagră; ISO: isoprenaline.
Serum oxidative stress markers.
| GP | TOS | TAR | OSI | MDA | SH | NOx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | 26.92 ± 7.30 | 1.090 ± 0.001 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.22 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 33.31 ± 4.50 |
| ISO | 47.95∗∗ ± 2.70 | 1.089∗ ± 0.001 | 0.44∗∗ ± 0.02 | 5.25∗∗∗ ± 0.64 | 0.51n.s. ± 0.10 | 69.78∗∗∗ ± 3.06 |
| FNFs | 29.77## ± 4.86 | 1.091# ± 0.001 | 0.27## ± 0.04 | 4.64# ± 0.39 | 0.50n.s. ± 0.11 | 65.22n.s. ± 4.04 |
| FNFr | 32.53# ± 4.77 | 1.091# ± 0.001 | 0.30## ± 0.04 | 4.46# ± 0.20 | 0.54n.s. ± 0.07 | 66.3n.s. ± 3.18 |
Values are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 3). n.s.p > 0.05, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus control; n.s.p > 0.05, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.01 versus ISO group. GP: grape pomace; Fs: fresh; Fr: fermented; FN: Fetească neagră; ISO: isoprenaline; TOS: total oxidative status; TAR: total antioxidant reactivity; OSI: oxidative stress index; MDA: malondialdehyde; SH: total thiols; NOx: nitrites and nitrates.