Literature DB >> 29765447

MicroRNA-141 inhibits proliferation of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by targeting MACC1.

Shubin Li1, Jixian Zhu2, Junjie Li1, Shubo Li3, Bin Li1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abnormal expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) contributes to cancer development through regulating proliferation, apoptosis and drug resistance in cancer cells. The present study was designed to explore the effect and mechanism of miR-141 on gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one paired GCA tissues and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from GCA patients never treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. QRT-PCR was used to detect the expression level of miR-141 in GCA. Effects of miR-141 on cell proliferation and apoptosis were detected in vitro. Western blot analysis was used to determine the downstream targets of miR-141.
RESULTS: In the present study, our data showed that miR-141 was significantly decreased and correlated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastases in GCA. In addition, we found that miR-141 could inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in AGS cells. Moreover, MACC1 was predicted as a possible target of miR-141. The luciferase reporter assay proved that miR-141 could suppress MACC1 directly by binding to its 3'-UTR. Further studies showed that miR-141 influenced the MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that miR-141 expression was associated with GCA progression. MACC1, working as one possible target of miR-141, may contribute to the process. MiR-141 is expected to be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of GCA patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MACC1; MEK/ERK; gastric cardia adenocarcinoma; miR-141; p38 MAPK

Year:  2017        PMID: 29765447      PMCID: PMC5949917          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2017.68757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world, especially in less developed regions [1]. Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) is an adenocarcinoma that originates from the epithelial cells located in the connection between the stomach and esophagus and is among the most common types of gastric cancer [2]. Incidence of GCA in Asia has been increasing in recent years. Currently, surgery is a curative treatment for GCA patients [3]. There has been no effective post-surgery treatment for GCA. Metastasis and post-surgery recurrence rates in GCA are as high as 40–65% [4]. Thus, accurate and predictive markers and new therapeutic methods are urgently needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small non-coding RNAs which suppress their target mRNAs expression by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) based on sequence complementarity as well as accessibility of the potential target site. MiRNAs negatively regulate gene expression by either translational inhibition or degradation of target mRNAs [5]. Increasing evidence has shown that the abnormal expression of miRNAs plays important roles in many biological processes, including cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and metastasis [6, 7]. In recent years, numerous miRNAs have been shown to be involved in cancer progression. For example, Wang et al. showed that miR-124 could act as a tumor suppressor inhibiting cell proliferation and invasion by targeting B7-H3 in osteosarcoma [8]. Li et al. suggested that downregulated miR-506 expression facilitated pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance via SPHK1/Akt/NF-κB signaling [9]. Zhang et al. showed that miR-152 regulated metastases of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting neuropilin-1 [10]. However, the function and mechanism of miR-141 in GCA have not been systematically studied. In the present study, we aimed to determine the expression of miR-141 in GCA, analyze the association between miR-141 expression and tumor progression, and further to explore the possible underlying mechanism.

Material and methods

Tissue samples

A total of 41 patients with GCA who underwent curative surgery at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xinxiang Central Hospital between 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. Fresh samples from pathologically representative tumor regions and paired adjacent normal gastric mucosal tissues were obtained. These tissues were stored at –80°C until the proteins and RNA were extracted. The pathological nature of each specimen was confirmed by examination with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Prior treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, were not used before surgery in any of the cases. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Xinxiang Central Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the RNA PCR Kit (Takara). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on the ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems). Then qRT-PCR was performed to quantify the expression level of miR-141 with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MiR-141 expression normalized to U6 was calculated using the comparative Ct method formula: 2–ΔΔCt. The primer sequences were as follows: miR-141 forward, 5′-AAGGAGAGAGCGGGAAGCTA-3′, and reverse, 5′-TTGTTGCAACTGCCTCTGGA-3′; U6 forward, 5′-GTTGGAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGA-3′, and reverse, 5′-GAGGGATCTCGCTCCTGGAGGA-3′.

Cell lines and cell culture

The human gastric cancer cell line AGS was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 100 mg/ml penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were maintained under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. The miR-141 mimics, NC mimics, miR-141 inhibitor, and NC inhibitor, synthesized and purified by GenePharma Company (Shanghai), were transfected into AGS cells at a final concentration of 50 nM using X-treme in serum-free Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). Transfection efficiency was confirmed by qRT- PCR.

Cell proliferation assay

The cell proliferation assay was performed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. After transfection with the indicated mimics or inhibitor, cells were plated in 96-well plates at 5 × 103 per well in 200 μl culture medium. After 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT was added to each well, then the cells were incubated for 4 h before 150 μl of DMSO was added. Once the insoluble crystals were completely dissolved, the absorbance values at 570 nm were measured by a micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader. All results were obtained from at least three experiments with triplicate reactions.

Cell apoptosis analysis

Cell apoptosis analysis was performed with the Annexin-V FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were seeded into 12-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well in triplicate and transfected with the indicated mimics or inhibitor for 48 h, and then examined using a flow cytometer, and the apoptosis populations were determined by ModFit software. All results were obtained from at least three experiments with triplicate reactions.

Luciferase reporter assay

To evaluate the effect of miR-141 on MACC1 3′-UTR, firefly and Renilla luciferase activity were measured with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). The psi-CHECK2 or psi-CHECK2 vectors containing MACC1 3′-UTR-Wt or MACC1 3′-UTR-Mut were cotransfected with miR-141 mimics/NC mimics into cells using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen).

Western blot analysis

The proteins were extracted from the transfected cells. Briefly, the cells were washed with PBS and suspended in a lysis buffer. The lysates were collected and stored at –20°C. Supernatant protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay system (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of protein samples were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blots were blocked for 2 h with 5% nonfat milk at room temperature, then immunoblotted with primary antibodies in PBS and incubated at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed with PBS-T and then incubated with secondary antibodies. The blots were scanned and the band density was measured using the Quantity One imaging software. The primary antibodies anti-Bax, anti-caspase-3, anti-Bcl-2, anti-MACC1 and anti-GAPDH were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The primary antibodies of anti-p-p38, anti-p-MEK, anti-p-ERK, anti-P38, anti-MEK and anti-ERK were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 software and GraphPad Prism 5. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical evaluation of the data was performed with one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test or the χ2 test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MiR-141 was downregulated in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma tissues

To validate the function of miR-141 in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), we explored the expression of miR-141 in 41 pairs of GCA tissue and matched adjacent normal tissues by using qRT-PCR. Our results revealed that the expression level of miR-141 in tumor tissues was generally lower than the matched adjacent normal tissues (Figure 1, p < 0.05). To explore the correlation between miR-141 expression and pathological characteristics in GCA tumors, we divided the 41 GCA patients into a high expression group and a low expression group according to the median expression of miR-141 in all GCA samples. Our data showed that low miR-141 expression was correlated with TNM stage and lymph node metastases (Table I; p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between miR-141 expression and the other clinicopathological parameters, including patients’ age, gender, depth of invasion, and family history of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer (UGIC). Thus, these observations suggested that miR-141 was associated with the progression and development of GCA.
Figure 1

MiR-141 was decreased in GCA tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Relative expression level of miR-141 in GCA tissues and adjacent normal tissues was detected by qRT-PCR

*P < 0.05.

Table I

Correlation between miR-141 expression and clinicopathologic features

VariablePatientLow expressionHigh expressionP-value
Age [years]:    
 < 50171160.680
 ≥ 50241410 
Gender:    
 Male191180.707
 Female22148 
Depth of invasion:    
 T1/2261880.154
 T3/41578 
History of UGIC:    
 Negative231670.202
 Positive1899 
TNM stage:    
 I, II219120.015
 III, IV20164 
Lymph node metastases:    
 Negative2612140.010
 Positive15132 
Correlation between miR-141 expression and clinicopathologic features MiR-141 was decreased in GCA tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Relative expression level of miR-141 in GCA tissues and adjacent normal tissues was detected by qRT-PCR *P < 0.05.

MiR-141 suppressed cell proliferation

To examine the influence of miR-141 on GCA progression and the possible mechanism, we transfected GCA cells with miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor. The transfection efficiency was validated by qRT-PCR (Figure 2 A, p < 0.05). The MTT assay was used to evaluate cell viability directly. We found that miR-141 mimics significantly reduced GCA cell viability compared to the control group, while the inhibition of miR-141 promoted cell viability (Figure 2 B, p < 0.05). To investigate the potential mechanisms underlying cell proliferation, flow cytometry was used. Apoptosis analysis showed that miR-141 mimics promoted cell apoptosis compared to the control group, while the inhibition of miR-141 inhibited cell apoptosis compared with the control group (Figure 2 C, p < 0.05). Furthermore, we explored the expression level of apoptosis-related proteins (Bax, Bcl-2 and caspase-3). Western blot showed that miR-141 mimics increased the expression of Bax and caspase-3 protein. Contrarily, Bcl-2 expression was depressed, while the inhibition of miR-141 decreased the expression of Bax and caspase-3 protein and increased the expression of Bcl-2 (Figure 2 D, p < 0.05). These findings suggested that miR-141 inhibited GCA cell proliferation by promoting cell apoptosis.
Figure 2

MiR-141 inhibited AGS cell proliferation in vitro. A – Expression of miR-141 in AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics, NC mimics, miR-141 inhibitor, and NC inhibitor. B – The vitality of AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor was detected using the MTT assay. C – The apoptosis rate of AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor was detected using the flow cytometer. D – The expression level of apoptosis-related proteins (Bax, Bcl-2 and caspase-3) was detected by Western blot in miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor transfected AGS cells

*P < 0.05.

MiR-141 inhibited AGS cell proliferation in vitro. A – Expression of miR-141 in AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics, NC mimics, miR-141 inhibitor, and NC inhibitor. B – The vitality of AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor was detected using the MTT assay. C – The apoptosis rate of AGS cells transfected with miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor was detected using the flow cytometer. D – The expression level of apoptosis-related proteins (Bax, Bcl-2 and caspase-3) was detected by Western blot in miR-141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor transfected AGS cells *P < 0.05.

MACC1 was a direct target of miR-141

To explore the mechanism underlying the growth inhibition by miR-141 in GCA cells, we used publicly available algorithms (TargetScan, miRanda, miRwalk) to predict the potential targets of miR-141 in humans. MACC1 was predicted as a potential target of miR-141 by the three algorithms (Figure 3 A). Through Western blot, we found that MACC1 was significantly decreased after transfection of miR-141 mimics and increased after transfection of miR-141 inhibitor (Figure 3 B, p < 0.05). The dual luciferase reporter assay was employed to confirm whether miR-141 could directly bind to 3′-UTR of MACC1. We found that miR-141 upregulation significantly suppressed the relative luciferase activity of the wild type (Wt) reporter plasmid, but that of the mutant (Mut) reporter plasmid was unaffected (Figure 3 C, p < 0.05). These results suggested that miR-141 directly recognized the 3′-UTR of MACC1 mRNA and inhibited MACC1 translation.
Figure 3

MACC1 was a target of miR-141 in GCA cells. A – The potential miR-141 binding sites of MACC1 3′-UTR and the Mut sequences. B – Western blot analysis of MACC1 expression in AGS cells after transfection with miR- 141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor. C – AGS cells were co-transfected with miR-141 mimics or NC mimics with wild type or mutant MACC1 3′-UTR. Dual luciferase reporter assay was used

*P < 0.05.

MACC1 was a target of miR-141 in GCA cells. A – The potential miR-141 binding sites of MACC1 3′-UTR and the Mut sequences. B – Western blot analysis of MACC1 expression in AGS cells after transfection with miR- 141 mimics or miR-141 inhibitor. C – AGS cells were co-transfected with miR-141 mimics or NC mimics with wild type or mutant MACC1 3′-UTR. Dual luciferase reporter assay was used *P < 0.05.

MiR-141 inhibited MEK/ERK and activated p38 MAPK signaling

To further explore the possible mechanism, we examined the MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. We found that miR-141 mimics significantly activated the p38 signaling pathway. Meanwhile, transfection of miR-141 mimics inhibited activation of MEK. The expression of p-ERK was decreased but there was no change in the total-ERK as compared with NC mimics. The inhibition of miR-141 inhibited the p38 signaling pathway. Meanwhile, transfection of miR-141 inhibitor promoted activation of MEK. The expression of p-ERK was increased but there was no change in the total ERK as compared with NC inhibitor (Figure 4, p < 0.05). Therefore, the present study indicated that miR-141 could inhibit the cell proliferation of GCA by regulation of MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways.
Figure 4

MiR-141 inhibited MEK/ERK and activated p38 MAPK signaling. p-p38, p38, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK were measured by Western blot

MiR-141 inhibited MEK/ERK and activated p38 MAPK signaling. p-p38, p38, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK were measured by Western blot

Discussion

Accumulating data showed that miR-141 was a significantly dysregulated miRNA in various cancers and was associated with cancer development. For example, Wang et al. reported that increased miR-141 expression was associated with diagnosis and favorable prognosis of patients with bladder cancer [11]. Liu et al. suggested that miR-141 was increased in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and involved in BRD7-mediated cell proliferation and tumor formation through suppression of the PTEN/AKT pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [12]. However, Peng et al. suggested that miR-141 could inhibit glioma cell growth and metastasis by targeting TGF-β2 [13]. Chen et al. reported that miR-141 was downregulated in renal cell carcinoma and regulated cell proliferation and metastasis by controlling EphA2 expression [14]. Huang et al. found that miR-141 inhibited gastric cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth, and the regulatory mechanism might be associated with IGF1R [15]. However, the roles of miR-141 in GCA remain unclear. The difference of miRNAs between cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues indicated that these specific miRNAs were involved in the occurrence and development of cancer and could be potential targets for cancer treatment. Gastric cancer also exhibited alterations in the abundance of specific miRNAs. For example, Yin et al. suggested that miR-208a-3p suppressed cell apoptosis by targeting PDCD4 in gastric cancer [16]. Wu et al. found that miR-483-5p promoted growth, invasion and self-renewal of gastric cancer stem cells by Wnt/β-catenin signaling [17]. The imbalances of substantial miRNAs in gastric cancer tissues have been proposed as potential biomarkers for prognosis [18]. In our study, we found that the expression of miR-141 was lower in GCA tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues, indicating that miR-141 may serve as a tumor suppressor in GCA progression. In addition, we found that the low expression of miR-141 was correlated with TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. Lu et al. observed that decreased miR-141 expression in gastric cancer was significantly associated with tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and TNM stage, which was inconsistent with our findings [19]. To explore the possible mechanism of miR-141 in GCA, we employed a gastric cancer cell model. MiR-141 mimics significantly reduced cell proliferation and increased the apoptosis of AGS cells. Further studies showed that apoptosis-related proteins were also changed. MiR-141 mimics increased protein levels of Bax and caspase-3. Conversely, Bcl-2 expression was depressed. Meanwhile, miR-141 inhibition reduced Bax and caspase-3 protein expression and increased Bcl-2 protein expression. The results indicated that an imbalance of Bax, caspase-3 and Bcl-2 might contribute to apoptosis of GCA cells, suggesting that miR-141 might serve as a tumor suppressor in GCA progression. MiRNA is a cluster of non-coding RNA combined with specific target genes which play critical biological functions in tumor progression. To explore the possible target of miR-141, we searched three publicly available algorithms (TargetScan, miRanda, miRwalk) and found that MACC1 was a potential target of miR-141. To confirm the prediction, we introduced exogenous miR-141 into AGS cells and found that miR-141 mimics down-regulated MACC1 expression, while inhibition of miR-141 in AGS cells significantly increased MACC1 expression. The luciferase reporter assay also proved that miR-141 could suppress MACC1 directly by binding to its 3′-UTR. Previous studies have shown that MACC1 plays important roles in the development and progression of gastric cancer [20, 21]. Thus, we inferred that miR-141 might regulate GCA progression by regulating MACC1. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1) is an oncogene first discovered in colon cancer, where its main action was thought to be promotion of metastasis [22]. The MACC1 gene is located on human chromosome 7 (7p21.1), contains seven exons and six introns, and the effective coding region of the gene consists of 2559 nucleotides [23]. Recently, a number of studies have shown that there is a close relationship between MACC1 and proliferation, metastasis and recurrence of a variety of tumors [24-26]. Zhang et al. demonstrated that MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK signaling mediated by MACC1 regulated cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in ovarian cancer [27]. In the present study, we also observed the change of MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK. We found that miR-141 mimics significantly activated the p38 signaling pathway, whereas miR-497 mimics inhibited activation of MEK and ERK. These results suggested that restoration of the expression of miR-141 suppressed MACC1, which may modulate MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK signaling in GCA. In conclusion, our data suggested that miR-141 was downregulated in GCA tissues, and ectopic expression of miR-141 inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in vitro. MACC1 was identified as a target of miR-141 in GCA, and overexpression of miR-141 inhibited MEK/ERK and activated the p38 MAPK signaling pathway, indicating that miR-141 might be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of GCA.
  26 in total

1.  Prognostic value of miR-141 downregulation in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y B Lu; J J Hu; W J Sun; X H Duan; X Chen
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2015-12-17

Review 2.  MicroRNA function in animal development.

Authors:  Erno Wienholds; Ronald H A Plasterk
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  MACC1 controls Met: what a difference an Sp1 site makes.

Authors:  Ulrike Stein; Janice Smith; Wolfgang Walther; Franziska Arlt
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Relation between microRNA expression and progression and prognosis of gastric cancer: a microRNA expression analysis.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ueda; Stefano Volinia; Hiroshi Okumura; Masayoshi Shimizu; Cristian Taccioli; Simona Rossi; Hansjuerg Alder; Chang-gong Liu; Naohide Oue; Wataru Yasui; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Hiroki Sasaki; Sachiyo Nomura; Yasuyuki Seto; Michio Kaminishi; George A Calin; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  miR‑483‑5p promotes growth, invasion and self‑renewal of gastric cancer stem cells by Wnt/β‑catenin signaling.

Authors:  Kai Wu; Longan Ma; Jinxiang Zhu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  Effects of metastasis-associated in colon cancer 1 inhibition by small hairpin RNA on ovarian carcinoma OVCAR-3 cells.

Authors:  Ruitao Zhang; Huirong Shi; Zhimin Chen; Qinghua Wu; Fang Ren; Haoliang Huang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-16

7.  MicroRNA-143 targets MACC1 to inhibit cell invasion and migration in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Zhongqiu Wang; Min Chen; Liang Peng; Xinying Wang; Qunying Ma; Fengli Ma; Bo Jiang
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  miR-141 is involved in BRD7-mediated cell proliferation and tumor formation through suppression of the PTEN/AKT pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Liu; R Zhao; H Wang; Y Luo; X Wang; W Niu; Y Zhou; Q Wen; S Fan; X Li; W Xiong; J Ma; X Li; M Tan; G Li; M Zhou
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  miR-208a-3p suppresses cell apoptosis by targeting PDCD4 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kai Yin; Minghui Liu; Mei Zhang; Feng Wang; Min Fen; Zhijian Liu; Yutao Yuan; Shanting Gao; Liuqing Yang; Weijie Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Baoliang Guo; Jianwei Xu; Hongwei Liang; Xi Chen; Wenxian Guan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

10.  Downregulated miR-506 expression facilitates pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance via SPHK1/Akt/NF-κB signaling.

Authors:  J Li; H Wu; W Li; L Yin; S Guo; X Xu; Y Ouyang; Z Zhao; S Liu; Y Tian; Z Tian; J Ju; B Ni; H Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  7 in total

1.  Expression of miRNA in 5-FU resistant esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Prasit Mahawongkajit; Prakitpunthu Tomtitchong
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Circulating miR-141 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic targets in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ganghua Yang; Zhengyang Lu; Fandi Meng; Yong Wan; Lei Zhang; Qinhong Xu; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Risk factors predisposing to cardia gastric adenocarcinoma: Insights and new perspectives.

Authors:  Esmat Abdi; Saeid Latifi-Navid; Saber Zahri; Abbas Yazdanbod; Farhad Pourfarzi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Up-regulation of IGF2BP2 by multiple mechanisms in pancreatic cancer promotes cancer proliferation by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xiaodong Xu; Yan Yu; Ke Zong; Pengwei Lv; Yuantin Gu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 5.  One stomach, two subtypes of carcinoma-the differences between distal and proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Peng-Shan Zhang; Ze-Yin Rong; Chen Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  Semen affects the biological behavior of HeLa cells by altering ERK signaling.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Guo; Dan-Dan Zhang; Li Pang; Yu-Ting Wang; Pin Cao; Shu-Lan Zhang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Knockdown of microRNA-130b improves doxorubicin sensitivity in bladder urothelial carcinoma by negatively regulating cylindromatosis expression.

Authors:  Bo Li; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.