| Literature DB >> 29765096 |
Yong Joon Lee1, Sat Byol Lee2,3, Suk Kyung Beak2,3, Yoon Dae Han3, Min Soo Cho3, Hyuk Hur3, Kang Young Lee3, Nam Kyu Kim3, Byung Soh Min4,5.
Abstract
We measured systemic changes in the immune response in 92 patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and subsequent surgery for rectal cancer. The peripheral blood was sampled five times from the onset of CRT until surgery. Lymphocytes decreased continuously during CRT but increased after CRT. The increased lymphocyte population was predominantly CD8+ T lymphocytes, which accounted for a significantly larger proportion in patients without residual lymph node metastasis than in those with residual lymph node metastasis. Neutrophils and monocytes decreased during the initial two weeks of CRT but were maintained or increased afterwards. Neutrophil and monocyte counts were significantly lower in patients with a pCR (pathologic complete response) than in those without a pCR two weeks after CRT began but not at the initiation of CRT. All cytokines showed dramatic changes one month after the termination of CRT. Cytokines related to the antitumour immune response increased, and those related to tumour progression decreased. The predictive value of cytokines was not clear. In short, we observed that immune components in peripheral blood are affected by CRT and show dynamic changes over time. We identified biomarker candidates to predict the pathologic response in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29765096 PMCID: PMC5953940 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25970-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinicopathological characteristics.
| N = 92 | |
|---|---|
|
| 57.35 ± 11.01 |
|
| |
| Male | 66 (71.7%) |
| Female | 26 (28.3%) |
|
| |
| AWD/AMD | 87 (94.6%) |
| APD | 2 (2.2%) |
| Mucinous | 3 (3.2%) |
|
| |
| cT2 | 7 (7.6%) |
| cT3 | 75 (81.5%) |
| cT4 | 10 (10.9%) |
|
| |
| negative | 22 (23.9%) |
| positive | 70 (76.1%) |
|
| |
| negative | 27 (29.3%) |
| positive | 65 (70.7%) |
|
| |
| 1 (pCR) | 19 (20.7%) |
| 2 | 17 (18.5%) |
| 3 | 44 (47.8%) |
| 4 | 12 (13.0%) |
|
| |
| yN0 | 63 (68.5%) |
| yN1 | 23 (25.0%) |
| yN2 | 6 (6.5%) |
Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). AWD = well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; AMD = moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; APD = poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; CRM = circumferential resection margin.
Figure 1Schematic diagram of treatment schedule and peripheral blood sampling schedule. IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Gy = greys; wks = weeks; CRT = chemoradiation therapy; OP = operation.
Figure 2Changes in leukocyte composition in response to CRT: complete blood count (CBC) analysis. (a) Absolute numbers of total leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes in patients (n = 92) during and after CRT are indicated by dots. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated statistically significant effects of time; total leukocytes p < 0.001; neutrophils p < 0.001; lymphocytes p < 0.001; and monocytes p < 0.001. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was performed to analyse differences between time points. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.0083 (adjusted significance level by Bonferroni’s method); ***p < 0.001. (b) Changes in the ratios of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes to total leukocytes (percentage of total leukocytes). Data are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). Onset = the onset of CRT; CRT2wks = 2 weeks after the onset of CRT; CRT1mo = 1 month after the onset of CRT; postCRT = 1 month after the termination of CRT.
Figure 3Predictive value of leukocyte components regarding pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients were divided into two groups: patients with a pCR (n = 19) and patients without a pCR (n = 73). (a) Mean (±standard deviation, SD) total leukocyte counts of the two groups at each time point. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.031; time-group interaction p = 0.616. (b) Mean (±SD) neutrophil counts of the two groups at each time point. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.020; time-group interaction p = 0.610. (c) Mean (±SD) lymphocyte counts of the two groups at each time point. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.916; time-group interaction p = 0.343. (d) Mean (±SD) monocyte counts of the two groups at each time point. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.012; time-group interaction p = 0.983. The intergroup differences were analysed using the two-tailed Welch’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.0125 (adjusted significance level by Bonferroni’s method); ***p < 0.001. Onset = the onset of CRT; CRT2wks = 2 weeks after the onset of CRT; CRT1mo = 1 month after the onset of CRT; postCRT = 1 month after the termination of CRT.
Figure 4Changes in lymphocyte composition in response to CRT and the predictive value of these changes regarding pathological treatment response. (a) A flow cytometry plot shows the stratification of CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Lymphocytes were gated on a forward scatter by side scatter plot. Lymphocytes were subdivided into CD4+ T lymphocytes (CD3+CD4+) and CD8+ T lymphocytes (CD3+CD8+). (b) The proportions of CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD4+ T lymphocytes among total lymphocytes are presented in the left figure (n = 63). The ratio of CD8+ T lymphocytes to CD4+ T lymphocytes is presented in the right figure. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was used to analyse differences between two adjacent time points. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.0125 (adjusted significance level by Bonferroni’s method); ***p < 0.001. (c) The difference in the ratio of CD8+ T lymphocytes to CD4+ T lymphocytes between the pCR group (n = 15) and the non-pCR group (n = 49) is presented in the left figure. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.924; time-group interaction p = 0.838. The difference in the ratio of CD8+ T lymphocytes to CD4+ T lymphocytes between the ypN0 (no residual lymph node metastasis on pathological exam) group (n = 49) and the ypN1 or ypN2 (residual lymph node metastasis on pathological exam) group (n = 15) is presented in the right figure. Repeated measures ANOVA; time effect p < 0.001; group effect p = 0.07; time-group interaction p = 0.199. The intergroup differences were analysed using the two-tailed Welch’s t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (adjusted significance level by Bonferroni’s method); ***p < 0.001. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Onset = the onset of CRT; CRT2wks = 2 weeks after the onset of CRT; CRT1mo = 1 month after the onset of CRT; postCRT = 1 month after the termination of CRT; preOP = just before surgery.
Figure 5Changes in serum cytokine levels in response to CRT. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was used to analyse differences between two adjacent time points. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.0125 (adjusted significance level by Bonferroni’s method); ***p < 0.001. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. 1 = the onset of CRT; 2 = 2 weeks after the onset of CRT; 3 = 1 month after the onset of CRT; 4 = 1 month after the termination of CRT; 5 = just before surgery.