| Literature DB >> 29765088 |
Daniel Höche1,2, Sviatlana V Lamaka3, Bahram Vaghefinazari3, Tobias Braun4, Rokas P Petrauskas5, Maximilian Fichtner4,6, Mikhail L Zheludkevich3,7.
Abstract
Aqueous Mg battery technology holds significant appeal, owing to the availability of raw materials, high power densities and the possibility of fast mechanical recharge. However, Mg batteries have so far been prone to decreased capacity due to self-corrosion of the anodes from the electrochemical redeposition of impurities, such as Fe, which results in parasitic cathodically active sites on the discharging anode. This work demonstrates that by adding Fe3+-complexing agents like Tiron or salicylate to the aqueous electrolyte of an Mg battery, it was possible to prevent the redeposition of Fe impurities and subsequent self-corrosion of the anode surface, thereby boosting battery performance. To prevent detrimental fouling of anode surface by Mg(OH)2, employed Fe3+-complexing agents must also form soluble complexes with Mg2+ of moderate stability. The interplay of these requirements predetermines the improvement of operating voltage and utilization efficiency.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29765088 PMCID: PMC5953936 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25789-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Additive working principles and mechanistic insights (a) Interaction of Fe impurities contained in the Mg anode with electrolyte additives (here salicylate, Sal) in aqueous Mg batteries. Re-plating of impurity particles accelerates self-corrosion of the anode. Interruption of the re-plating mechanism allows for the suppression of related anode fouling. (b) Principles of stabilization of aqueous Mg-air batteries by electrolyte additives, as illustrated in a synoptic summary (buoy, courtesy Martina Heineke, HZG). Main aspects of the additive effect are indicated and emphasize the scope of the discovery.
Figure 2Monitoring anode self-corrosion via hydrogen evolution. Measured kinetics of Mg self-corrosion based on cumulative HER measurements by immersion tests in 0.5% NaCl solution and 0.5% NaCl solution containing different additives (0.05 M). Optical images (right) show the sample appearance after the tests with pure aqueous NaCl and aqueous NaCl modified with Tiron or salicylate.
Half-cell testing related data and results.
| complexing agent | stability constants | weight loss [mg] after 24 h of discharge test | utilization efficiency η [%] | pH after 24 h of discharge test (7 at 0 h) | discharge voltage [V]Ag/AgCl after 24 h | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| log Kx FeIII | log Kx MgII | Ref. | |||||
| NaCl reference | — | — | — | 20.2 | 13.5 | 10.2 | −1.47 |
| +Tiron | 46.9 log K3 | 6.86 log K1 |
[ | 60.3 | 5.0 | 7.3 | −1.75 |
| +salicylate | 36.8 log K3 | 4.7 log K1 |
[ | 10.0 | 27.2 | 9.6 | −1.61 |
| +K2-EDTA | 24.23 log K1 | 8.64 log K1 |
[ | 34.9 | 7.8 | 7.2 | −1.58 |
| +glycolate | 4.7 log Ki | 0.92 log K1 |
[ | 12.6 | 21.6 | 9.8 | −1.47 |
| +oxalate | 20.2 log K3 | 4.38 log K2 |
[ | 12.5 | 21.8 | 9.9 | −1.47 |
| +NTA | 24.32 log K2 | 10.2 log K2 |
[ | 41.7 | 6.5 | 8.3 | −1.68 |
| +DBS | n/a | *pK0sp = 10.8 |
[ | 5.6 | 48.6 | 6.8 | −1.38 |
Stability constants of complexes formed by the tested battery additives (0.05 M) and weight loss after the Half-cell discharge test in 0.5% NaCl solution (initial anode area = 0.5 cm²). Additionally, utilization efficiency η[18,19], pH value and final voltage (errors within 3%) after 24 h discharge are shown. Substrate = commercial purity Mg (220 ppm Fe).
Figure 3Half-cell tests - screening of additive performance. (a) Discharge curves obtained at 0.5 mA/cm2 constant current in the half-cell setup with 0.5% NaCl electrolyte and 0.5% NaCl containing additives (0.05 M). The anode was commercial purity Mg (220 ppm Fe). 3D maps (right) show the surface morphology of the anodes after the tests. (b) Optical micrographs (bottom) showing the surface appearance of the anodes after the Half-cell tests. Topological line scans (i.e. depth profiles, top) indicate the consumption of the anode material during the discharging shown in (a) after 24 h. (c) Specific Energy calculated for Mg (220 ppm Fe) discharged in electrolyte containing Tiron 0.05 M, Salicylate 0.05 M and without any additives at different applied currents.
Figure 4Application of additives in a full-cell scenario. Comparison of Mg-air battery (carbon fabric as the cathode) discharge performance measured at 0.5 mA.cm−2 in 0.1 M NaCl electrolyte containing complexing agents (concentration 0.01 M for DBS and 0.05 M for other additives). The anode was high purity Mg (50 ppm Fe). The average battery voltage increase vs. the reference is listed.
Physicochemical processes vs. battery performance parameters.
| acting process | formation of | fluctuating dissolution | adsorption | convection/flow | comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| controlled property | Fe–ligand | Mg–ligand | insoluble reaction products | ||||
| utilization efficiency |
|
|
|
|
|
| max. improvement in this work: factor 2 |
| voltage |
|
|
|
|
|
| theoretical anode limit: −2.1 [V]Ag/AgCl[1] |
| Example 1: Tiron | strong | strong | no | no | no | weak effect | high voltage but low durability |
| Example 2: oxalate | moderate | moderate | yes | weak | yes | effect | battery fails as result of anode blockage |
| Example 3: salicylate | strong | moderate | weak | no | weak | weak effect | moderate voltage with high durability |
Control of the discharge behaviour by physical/chemical interaction processes (increase, decrease or no change) and respective additive examples.