Mary P Kovacevic1, Steven Baroletti2, Suzanne M Galal3, Paul M Szumita4. 1. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Administration, L-2, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: Mkovacevic@bwh.harvard.edu. 2. MetroWest Medical Center, 115 Lincoln St., Framingham, MA 01702, United States. Electronic address: steven.baroletti@mwmc.com. 3. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of the Pacific, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 3601 Pacific Ave., Stockton, CA 95211, United States. Electronic address: sgalal@pacific.edu. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Administration, L-2, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: Pszumita@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical pharmacy practice relies on the ability to critically evaluate clinical trials and apply their findings to patient care. The development of these skills begins in pharmacy school, develops during residency programs, and continues to mature while practicing clinical pharmacy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate student attitudes and perceptions following implementation of the Journal Interpretation Summary Tool (JIST) into a pharmacy curriculum. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The "journal club" is an activity implemented in many curricula with the intent to hone these skills. The JIST is a standardized template aimed at improving the consistency of a journal review by organizing major elements of a trial, allowing the facilitator and participants to navigate through key information and guide the journal club discussion. FINDINGS: Implementation of JIST resulted in an increased level of confidence for a majority of students (63.3%) when conducting and critically evaluating a journal article. More than 80% of students reported they were better able to critically evaluate a published article using JIST, and 91.9% reported JIST provided structure to the journal club process. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY: JIST provides the appropriate level of guidance and structure, particularly for the novice pharmacy student or pharmacist. The use of a standardized tool for journal club evaluation may lead to further improvements in applying literature to practice and other skills surrounding the critique of medical literature.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical pharmacy practice relies on the ability to critically evaluate clinical trials and apply their findings to patient care. The development of these skills begins in pharmacy school, develops during residency programs, and continues to mature while practicing clinical pharmacy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate student attitudes and perceptions following implementation of the Journal Interpretation Summary Tool (JIST) into a pharmacy curriculum. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The "journal club" is an activity implemented in many curricula with the intent to hone these skills. The JIST is a standardized template aimed at improving the consistency of a journal review by organizing major elements of a trial, allowing the facilitator and participants to navigate through key information and guide the journal club discussion. FINDINGS: Implementation of JIST resulted in an increased level of confidence for a majority of students (63.3%) when conducting and critically evaluating a journal article. More than 80% of students reported they were better able to critically evaluate a published article using JIST, and 91.9% reported JIST provided structure to the journal club process. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY: JIST provides the appropriate level of guidance and structure, particularly for the novice pharmacy student or pharmacist. The use of a standardized tool for journal club evaluation may lead to further improvements in applying literature to practice and other skills surrounding the critique of medical literature.