Literature DB >> 29762912

Professional and Personal Competency Development in Near-peer Tutors of Gross Anatomy: A Longitudinal Mixed-methods Study.

Simone Alvarez1, Jobst-Hendrik Schultz1.   

Abstract

There are many benefits to peer and near-peer tutoring. The current literature suggests that near-peer teaching within the domain of gross anatomy may lead to the development of numerous competencies for burgeoning medical professionals. The aim of this study was a quantitative and qualitative approach to explore which professional and personal competencies anatomy tutors developed as a result of their teaching activities in a gross anatomy course at a medical school in Germany. For a period of 18 months, 24 peer tutors were followed and queried multiple times via questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. It was found that most of the skills tutors developed or strengthened over one semester matched most of the core competencies described in various official competency frameworks used for physician education. In particular, tutors thought that tutoring gross anatomy had improved their knowledge of professional behavior as well as their communication skills. They also felt that they had learned to take on more responsibility and to use available resources more effectively. Overall, tutoring gross anatomy was perceived as very challenging, but also very rewarding, mainly because it provided the opportunity to develop and strengthen important skills such as self-confidence, self-awareness, positive thinking, self-insight, and stress management. Ultimately, these are all factors that contribute to resilience, an important attribute for physicians.
© 2018 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  competency development; gross anatomy education; medical education; mixed-methods; peer tutors; qualitative research; resiliency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29762912     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  1 in total

Review 1.  Does peer teaching improve academic results and competencies during medical school? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Marijke Avonts; Nele R Michels; Katrien Bombeke; Niel Hens; Samuel Coenen; Olivier M Vanderveken; Benedicte Y De Winter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.263

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.