| Literature DB >> 29762482 |
Ilaria Armentano1, Debora Puglia2, Francesca Luzi3, Carla Renata Arciola4,5, Francesco Morena6, Sabata Martino7, Luigi Torre8.
Abstract
In the present review paper, our main results on nanocomposites based on biodegradable polymers (on a time scale from 2010 to 2018) are reported. We mainly focused our attention on commercial biodegradable polymers, which we mixed with different nanofillers and/or additives with the final aim of developing new materials with tunable specific properties. A wide list of nanofillers have been considered according to their shape, properties, and functionalization routes, and the results have been discussed looking at their roles on the basis of different adopted processing routes (solvent-based or melt-mixing processes). Two main application fields of nanocomposite based on biodegradable polymers have been considered: the specific interaction with stem cells in the regenerative medicine applications or as antimicrobial materials and the active role of selected nanofillers in food packaging applications have been critically revised, with the main aim of providing an overview of the authors' contribution to the state of the art in the field of biodegradable polymeric nanocomposites.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradable polymer; nanocomposite; nanofiller
Year: 2018 PMID: 29762482 PMCID: PMC5978172 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Electron microscopy images of the main used nanofillers: silver nanoparticles (a), single-walled carbon nanotubes (b), carbon nanofibers (c), nanohydroxyapatite (d), cellulose nanocrystals (e), and lignin nanoparticles (f). Adapted with permission from [9,10,11,12].
Examples of the specific biological applications achieved using different types of stem cells and biomaterials, in terms of polymers, nanocomposites and gels.
| Stem Cells | Biomaterials | Applications | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embryonic stem cells | |||
| Nanostructured poly( | cardiomyocytes | [ | |
| alginate microcapsules | midbrain dopamine neurons | [ | |
| PNIPAAm-PEG thermoresponsive hydrogel | Oligodendrocyte precursor cells | [ | |
| biocompatible and elastic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) scaffolds | differentiation of chondrogenic cells | [ | |
| 6-O-sulfated chitosan | neural differentiation | [ | |
| Adult stem cells | |||
| Adipose stem cells | Methacrylated gelatine (GelMA) and methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA) | promote angiogenesis for wound healing | [ |
| Strontium-hardystonite-Gahnite | osteogenic differentiation | [ | |
| Polymeric INTEGRA® Meshed Bilayer Wound Matrix | osteogenic differentiation adipogenic differentiation | [ | |
| Poly(lactic- | supported by a predominant vascular vessel | [ | |
| Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | Alginate hydrogel | axonal growth | [ |
| Polydopamine-laced hydroxyapatite collagen calcium silicate | Osteogenic differentiation | [ | |
| Hyaluronic acid silk fibroin-poly(ε-caprolactone | Cardiomyocytes differentiation | [ | |
| Silk fibroin films decorated with integrin-binding laminin peptide motifs (YIGSR and GYIGSR) in the presence of a biochemical cue | neuron-like cells | [ | |
| Hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H) groove topographies in the absence of a biochemical cue | Neuron-like differentiated cells | [ | |
| Neural stem progenitor cells | gel-like (SLIDING) fibres | proliferation and neurosphere formation within the fibrous structures without compromising viability. | [ |
| Immobilization of poly- | Neuronal differentiation | [ | |
| Hierarchically patterned substrate | Functional neurones | [ | |
| Induced pluripotent stem cells | Gelatine-poly(lactide- | Pancreatic differentiation | [ |
| photo-cross-linked chitosan hydrogels | Neuronal differentiation | [ | |
| polycaprolactone (PCL)/gelatine scaffolds | chondrogenesis | [ | |
| mineralized gelatine methacrylate-based matrices | Osteogenic differentiation | [ | |
| fibrous mats of poly( | Osteogenic differentiation | [ |
Figure 2Cartoon shows how advancements in engineering materials combat bacteria biofilm formation and in turn permit the growth and differentiation of stem/primary cells for biomedical purposes. The “purple” square represents a basic polymer with specific antibacterial modifications to block bacterial growth and the biofilm accumulation and allow the growth and differentiation of stem cells. The “green” square represents a basic polymer (without antibacterial modifications) that is suitable for stem cell growth/differentiation and floating bacteria.
Mechanical properties and barrier properties of PLA- and PLA/PBS-based systems. Reprinted from [136].
| Mechanical Properties | Barrier Properties | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| σb | εb | EYoung | OP 1012 | WVP (100–53% RH) | |
| PLA | 32.7 ± 6.3 | 330 ± 50 | 1250 ± 190 | 1.98 ± 0.08 | 0.079 ± 0.004 |
| PLA_1CNC | 26.8 ± 2.5 | 275 ± 15 | 1300 ± 50 | 1.66 ± 0.06 | 0.073 ± 0.003 |
| PLA_3CNC | 22.7 ± 3.2 | 160 ± 30 | 1540 ± 60 | 1.57 ± 0.05 | 0.087 ± 0.013 |
| PLA_1s-CNC | 22.4 ± 3.9 | 300 ± 30 | 1400 ± 100 | 1.61 ± 0.05 | 0.087 ± 0.013 |
| PLA_3s-CNC | 28.0 ± 4.8 | 270 ± 20 | 1260 ± 75 | 1.49 ± 0.04 | 0.068 ± 0.002 |
| PLA_20PBS | 30 ± 5.0 | 360 ± 30 | 920 ± 30 | 1.35 ± 0.02 | 0.065 ± 0.003 |
| PLA_20PBS_1CNC | 15.5 ± 2.2 | 210 ± 10 | 950 ± 50 | 1.26 ± 0.01 | 0.063 ± 0.003 |
| PLA_20PBS_3CNC | 21.4 ± 3.3 | 230 ± 25 | 1130 ± 90 | 1.09 ± 0.04 | 0.071 ± 0.008 |
| PLA_20PBS_1s-CNC | 23.5 ± 4.1 | 260 ± 25 | 970 ± 20 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.055 ± 0.005 |
| PLA_20PBS_3s-CNC | 20.1 ± 1.6 | 370 ± 40 | 1120 ± 75 | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.062 ± 0.002 |
Figure 3(a) FESEM investigation of CNC extracted from pre-treated kiwi fibres and UV–vis analysis of PVA-based formulation; (b) antioxidant activities of migrating substances for different PLA nanocomposite films immersed directly in the methanol solution for 24 h: monitoring of the absorbance for band at 517 nm and colour variation of the DPPH methanol solution (reprinted with permission from [137,148,149]).