Literature DB >> 29762278

Comparison of Intermediate to Long-Term Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Ankles with Preoperative Varus, Valgus, and Neutral Alignment.

Gun-Woo Lee1, Shao-Hua Wang1, Keun-Bae Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative ankle coronal malalignment has been considered as a risk factor for poor outcomes and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. The present study evaluated whether intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in ankles with preoperative varus and valgus malalignment (5° to 20°) are comparable with those with neutral alignment (<5°).
METHODS: We enrolled 144 consecutive ankles that underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty (140 patients) using a mobile-bearing HINTEGRA prosthesis with a minimum follow-up of 4 years; the mean overall follow-up duration was 89 months (51 to 145 months). We divided all patients into 3 groups according to the preoperative coronal plane tibiotalar angle: the varus group (59 ankles, 5° to 20° of varus), the valgus group (34 ankles, 5° to 20° of valgus), and the neutral group (51 ankles, <5°). Patients in each group showed similar characteristics in mean age, sex, body mass index, and follow-up period.
RESULTS: The mean Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale pain and disability score, American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score, visual analog scale pain score, and ankle range of motion did not differ meaningfully among the 3 groups at the final follow-up. The final tibiotalar angle showed that the degree of coronal alignment of the varus group was significantly less corrected compared with the neutral group (p = 0.010). The varus group had significantly more concomitant procedures (42 procedures [71.2%]) compared with the neutral group (p = 0.003). The prevalence of major complications did not differ among the 3 groups (p = 0.124). The overall probability of implant survivorship was 91.1% (97.7% in the varus group, 81.1% in the valgus group, and 90.9% in the neutral group) at a mean follow-up of 7.3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: In the intermediate to long-term follow-up, mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty showed similarly good outcomes in patients with varus and valgus malalignment up to 20° compared with the neutral alignment group when neutrally aligned ankles were achieved postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29762278     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Acute Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome After Total Ankle Arthroplasty With Varus Deformity.

Authors:  Obianuju A Obioha; Daniel D Bohl; Simon Lee; Kamran S Hamid
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

2.  CORR Insights®: Does Coronal Plane Malalignment of the Tibial Insert in Total Ankle Arthroplasty Alter Distal Foot Bone Mechanics? A Cadaveric Gait Study.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Does gender influence the outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in patients with ankle osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Intra-articular opening osteotomy combined with lateral ligament reconstruction for varus ankle arthritis.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Xing-Chen Li; Chang-Jun Guo; Xiang-Yang Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate skin adhesive and interrupted polypropylene sutures for wound closure in total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Woo Kyoung Kwak; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  12-year survival analysis of 322 Hintegra total ankle arthroplasties from an independent center.

Authors:  Mina Jane Zafar; Thomas Kallemose; Mostafa Benyahia; Lars Bo Ebskov; Jeannette Østergaard Penny
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Does the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Postoperative COFAS End-Stage Ankle Arthritis Classification System Correlate With Pre- and Postoperative PROMIS Scores for Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Maksim A Shlykov; Ian Savage-Elliott; Timothy M Lonergan; Sandra E Klein; Jonathon D Backus; Jeffrey E Johnson; Jeremy J McCormick
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-03-19

8.  Finite element stress analysis of the bearing component and bone resected surfaces for total ankle replacement with different implant material combinations.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Dahang Zhao; Wen-Ming Chen; Pengfei Chu; Shuo Wang; Chao Zhang; Jiazhang Huang; Xu Wang; Xin Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  What Are the Indications for Implant Revision in Three-component Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Nicola Krähenbühl; Roman Susdorf; Alexej Barg; Roxa Ruiz; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.