Literature DB >> 29762266

Flow Cytometry: Evolution of Microbiological Methods for Probiotics Enumeration.

Marco Pane1, Serena Allesina, Angela Amoruso, Stefania Nicola, Francesca Deidda, Luca Mogna.   

Abstract

GOALS: The purpose of this trial was to verify that the analytical method ISO 19344:2015 (E)-IDF 232:2015 (E) is valid and reliable for quantifying the concentration of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) in a finished product formulation.
BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry assay is emerging as an alternative rapid method for microbial detection, enumeration, and population profiling. The use of flow cytometry not only permits the determination of viable cell counts but also allows for enumeration of damaged and dead cell subpopulations. Results are expressed as TFU (Total Fluorescent Units) and AFU (Active Fluorescent Units). In December 2015, the International Standard ISO 19344-IDF 232 "Milk and milk products-Starter cultures, probiotics and fermented products-Quantification of lactic acid bacteria by flow cytometry" was published. This particular ISO can be applied universally and regardless of the species of interest. STUDY: Analytical method validation was conducted on 3 different industrial batches of L. rhamnosus GG according to USP39<1225>/ICH Q2R1 in term of: accuracy, precision (repeatability), intermediate precision (ruggedness), specificity, limit of quantification, linearity, range, robustness.
RESULTS: The data obtained on the 3 batches of finished product have significantly demonstrated the validity and robustness of the cytofluorimetric analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results obtained, the ISO 19344:2015 (E)-IDF 232:2015 (E) "Quantification of lactic acid bacteria by flow cytometry" can be used for the enumeration of L. rhamnosus GG in a finished product formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29762266     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  5 in total

1.  Dynamics of physiological responses of potentially probiotic fruit-derived Limosilactobacillus fermentum in apple and orange juices during refrigeration storage and exposure to simulated gastrointestinal conditions.

Authors:  Noádia Priscilla Araújo Rodrigues; Estefânia Fernandes Garcia; Karoliny Brito Sampaio; Heloísa Maria Almeida do Nascimento; Jossana Pereira de Sousa Guedes; Evandro Leite de Souza
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 2.  Paraprobiotics: A New Perspective for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals.

Authors:  Rosa Anna Siciliano; Anna Reale; Maria Fiorella Mazzeo; Stefano Morandi; Tiziana Silvetti; Milena Brasca
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  The Probiotic Identity Card: A Novel "Probiogenomics" Approach to Investigate Probiotic Supplements.

Authors:  Gabriele Andrea Lugli; Giulia Longhi; Giulia Alessandri; Leonardo Mancabelli; Chiara Tarracchini; Federico Fontana; Francesca Turroni; Christian Milani; Francesco Di Pierro; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Survival characteristics and transcriptome profiling reveal the adaptive response of the Brucella melitensis 16M biofilm to osmotic stress.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Jiale Zhu; Tianyi Zhao; Zhihua Sun; Shengnan Song; Yu Zhang; Dexin Zhu; Shuzhu Cao; Xingmei Deng; Yingjin Chai; Yongxue Sun; Suleimenov Maratbek; Chuangfu Chen; Liangbo Liu; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  PMA-qPCR method for the selective quantitation of viable lactic acid bacteria in fermented milk.

Authors:  Zihang Shi; Xiefei Li; Xiankang Fan; Jue Xu; Qing Liu; Zhen Wu; Daodong Pan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.