| Literature DB >> 29760795 |
Yanchun Wang1,2, Huijie Wang2,3, Shaokun Pan4, Tao Hu1, Jiabin Shen1, Hui Zheng1,2, Suhong Xie1,2, Youhua Xie4, Renquan Lu1,2, Lin Guo1,2.
Abstract
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common pathological type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). It is strongly correlated to the host immunity and infection status. Aim: This study tested the hypothesis that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is also associated with DLBCL.Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma; hepatitis B virus; infection
Year: 2018 PMID: 29760795 PMCID: PMC5950586 DOI: 10.7150/jca.24384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Prevalence of serum HBsAg of lymphoma patients.
| Lymphoma type (Number of patients) | HBsAg prevalence % ( | |
|---|---|---|
| All B-NHLs ( | 21.6 (161) | |
| DLBCL ( | 23.6 (120) | |
| FL ( | 22.4 (24) | |
| Other B-NHLs ( | 12.9 (17) | |
| All T-NHLs ( | 8.6 (29) | 0.328 |
| NK/T ( | 8.1 (19) | 0.587 |
| PTCL ( | 9.7 (7) | 0.408 |
| Other T-NHLs ( | 9.4 (3) | 0.500a |
| Unclassified NHL ( | 0 (0) | 1.000a |
HBsAg prevalence of respective lymphoma type was compared with the prevalence (7.2%, 5888/81775) of Chinese population by χ2 tests.
a P values were given by Fisher's exact test for expected count less than 5.
FL: follicular lymphoma, T-NHL: T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, PTCL: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NK/T: NK/T cell lymphoma.
The positive rate of serum HBsAg in various DLBCL stage.
| DLBCL Stage (Number of patients) | Positive rate of HBsAg % (n) | |
|---|---|---|
| Early Stage, I+II ( | 18.7 (54) | |
| Advanced Stage, III+IV ( | 30.1 (66) | |
| Stage I ( | 21.4 (25) | |
| Stage II ( | 16.9 (29) | |
| Stage III ( | 33.7 (33) | |
| Stage IV ( | 27.3 (33) |
The difference of serum HBsAg positivity between early and advanced DLBCL stage was compared by χ2 test. Tendency difference among serum HBsAg and DLBCL stage was additionally compared by linear trend χ2 test.
Figure 1HBV can infect lymphocytes in vitro. (A-C) PBMCs and (D-F) the DLBCL Pfeiffer cell line were infected by HBV (A, D) and a matched negative control (B, E) with MOI = 10. After infection for 24 h, the cells were collected and washed by centrifugation. (A, B, D, E) Following fixation and permeation, HBV anti-human HBx monoclonal antibody and a TRITC labeled secondary antibody was used to detect HBV by confocal microscopy and cells were stained with DAPI. (C, F) Cellular DNA was extracted and total HBV DNA was detected by PCR (fragment of 92bp). Lane 1, HBV-positive control; Lane 2, HBV-negative control; Lanes 3 and 4, cells infected for 24 h by HBV-positive (lane 3) or -negative (lane 4) serum. These data were expressed from at least three individual experiments.
Figure 2HBV was detected in DLBCL in situ. Anti-HBc, -HBs, and -HBx antibodies were used to detect the HBV antigen in several lymphoma tissue sections by immunohistochemistry. (A) Lymph node tissue from a DLBCL patient with HBV antigen-negative serum; (B) Patient with HBsAg-positive serum (> 250 IU/mL) and HBV DNA-positive serum (5.2×103 IU/mL); (C) IRS of immunohistochemistry from five serum HBV antigen-negative and ten HBV antigen-positive patients. The scores are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and statistics were carried out by one-way ANOVA, ***P<0.001; (D) DNA was extracted from DLBCL paraffin tissue, and HBV DNA was detected by PCR using total-HBV or 3.5kb-HBV DNA primers. DNA in lanes 1 to 3 were extracted from DLBCL tissues of HBV-positive serum and lane 4 was from that of HBV-negative serum.
Effect of serum HBsAg on the therapeutic efficacy in various DLBCL stage.
| Factors | Therapeutic Efficacy | OR (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | PR | SD | PD | ||||
| HBsAg Status | |||||||
| Negative ( | 220 | 96 | 17 | 26 | 1 | ||
| Positive ( | 31 | 57 | 12 | 13 | 3.04 (2.00~4.62) | ||
| DLBCL Stage | HBsAg | ||||||
| I | Negative ( | 73 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Positive ( | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4.28 (1.64~11.1) | ||
| II | Negative ( | 88 | 39 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |
| Positive ( | 10 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 2.97 (1.36~6.53) | ||
| III | Negative ( | 24 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | |
| Positive ( | 5 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 3.05 (1.29~7.19) | ||
| IV | Negative ( | 35 | 21 | 8 | 17 | 1 | |
| Positive ( | 3 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 2.39 (1.10~5.22) | ||
Ordinal logistic regression was introduced to access the factors in therapeutic efficacy of DLBCL. Effect of serum HBsAg positivity on the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy was also compared in separated DLBCL stage. All patients undergone CHOP regimen were evaluated in statistics.
Therapeutic efficacy was divided into 4 grade, such as CR (complete remission), PR (partial remission), SD (stable disease), and PD (progression disease).
OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.