Yoshitsugu Nakamura1, Hideto Nakajima2, Fumiharu Kimura2, Kiichi Unoda2, Shigeki Arawaka2. 1. Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Osaka Medical College, Takatsukishi, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: in1394@osaka-med.ac.jp. 2. Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Osaka Medical College, Takatsukishi, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The antiplatelet drug cilostazol decreases the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with chronic cerebral infarction. Additionally, cilostazol reduces the occurrence of pneumonia in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cilostazol is effective for preventing pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 199 consecutive Japanese patients with noncardioembolic acute cerebral infarction, who visited our hospital from January 2010 to April 2016, were retrospectively assessed by using medical records. We compared changes in the occurrence of pneumonia between cilostazol (n = 127) and noncilostazol (n = 72) groups. RESULTS: A total of 76% of patients in the cilostazol group were not administered other antiplatelet drugs. The median duration until cilostazol administration was 5 days (interquartile range = 2-8 days) after the onset of cerebral infarction. A total of 8.0% of the cohort was accompanied by pneumonia. The incidence of pneumonia in the cilostazol group was significantly lower than that in the noncilostazol group (4.7% versus 13.9%, P = .02). Within 30 days after acute cerebral infarction, the presence of neurological deterioration in the cilostazol group tended to be lower compared with the noncilostazol group, but this difference was not significant (5.5% versus 12.5%, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cilostazol is effective for preventing pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infarction.
BACKGROUND: The antiplatelet drug cilostazol decreases the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with chronic cerebral infarction. Additionally, cilostazol reduces the occurrence of pneumonia in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cilostazol is effective for preventing pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 199 consecutive Japanese patients with noncardioembolic acute cerebral infarction, who visited our hospital from January 2010 to April 2016, were retrospectively assessed by using medical records. We compared changes in the occurrence of pneumonia between cilostazol (n = 127) and noncilostazol (n = 72) groups. RESULTS: A total of 76% of patients in the cilostazol group were not administered other antiplatelet drugs. The median duration until cilostazol administration was 5 days (interquartile range = 2-8 days) after the onset of cerebral infarction. A total of 8.0% of the cohort was accompanied by pneumonia. The incidence of pneumonia in the cilostazol group was significantly lower than that in the noncilostazol group (4.7% versus 13.9%, P = .02). Within 30 days after acute cerebral infarction, the presence of neurological deterioration in the cilostazol group tended to be lower compared with the noncilostazol group, but this difference was not significant (5.5% versus 12.5%, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that cilostazol is effective for preventing pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infarction.