Literature DB >> 29759933

Trauma and fear in Australian midwives.

J Toohill1, J Fenwick2, M Sidebotham3, J Gamble4, D K Creedy5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the extent of trauma and birth-related fear in midwives and how this might affect practice. AIM: (1) Determine prevalence of birth related trauma and fear in midwives and associations with midwives' confidence to advise women during pregnancy of their birth options and to provide care in labour. (2) Describe midwives' experiences of birth related trauma and/or fear.
METHOD: A mixed methods design. A convenience sample of midwives (n=249) completed an anonymous online survey. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data. Latent content analysis was used to extrapolate meaning from the 170 midwives who wrote about their experiences of personal and/or professional trauma.
RESULTS: The majority of midwives (93.6%) reported professional (n=199, 85.4%) and/or personal (n=97, 41.6%) traumatic birth experiences. Eight percent (n=20) reported being highly fearful of birth. Trauma was not associated with practice concerns but fear was. Midwives categorised as having 'high fear' reported more practice concerns (Med 23.5, n=20) than midwives with 'low fear' (Med 8, n=212) (U=1396, z=-3.79, p<0.001, r=0.24). Reasons for personal trauma included experiencing assault, intervention and stillbirth. Professional trauma related to both witnessing and experiencing disrespectful care and subsequently feeling complicit in the provision of poor care. Feeling unsupported in the workplace and fearing litigation intensified trauma.
CONCLUSION: High fear was associated with lower confidence to support childbearing women. Fear and trauma in midwives warrants further investigation to better understand the impact on professional practice.
Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth; Fear; Midwives; Moral stress; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29759933     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  5 in total

1.  An interactive decision-making framework (i-DMF) to scale up maternity continuity of carer models.

Authors:  Jocelyn Toohill; Yogesh Chadha; Shelley Nowlan
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  Secondary traumatic stress in iranian midwives: stimuli factors, outcomes and risk management.

Authors:  Maryam Hajiesmaello; Sepideh Hajian; Hedyeh Riazi; Hamid Alavi Majd; Roya Yavarian
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  No one asked us: Understanding the lived experiences of midwives providing care in the north west suburbs of Melbourne during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interpretive phenomenology.

Authors:  Fran Hearn; Laura Biggs; Heather Wallace; Elisha Riggs
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.349

4.  The Effects of Musculoskeletal Disorders on Professional Quality of Life Among Midwives Working in Delivery Rooms.

Authors:  Sena Dilek Aksoy; Nafiye Dutucu; Resmiye Ozdilek; Hatice Acar Bektaş
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 5.  Insider knowledge as a double-edged sword: an integrative review of midwives' personal childbearing experiences.

Authors:  S Coulton Stoliar; H G Dahlen; A Sheehan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.