Theresa A Strzelczyk1, Rachel M Kaplan1, Meena Medler1, Bradley P Knight2. 1. Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: bknight@nm.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of elective electrical cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) when performed autonomously by a trained advanced practice provider (APP) using a guideline-directed protocol. BACKGROUND: APPs have emerged as an integral part of the cardiovascular team. METHODS: A licensed advanced practice nurse-clinical nurse specialist was trained and obtained credentials to perform CVs. The advanced practice nurse performed 415 CVs autonomously (APP group) in a noninvasive procedure room with an electrophysiologist (EP) immediately available in an adjacent electrophysiology laboratory. The APP performed a history and physical examination, obtained informed consent, reviewed each patient with the supervising EP, and performed the CV. An anesthesiologist administered sedation. Outcomes were compared with 387 CVs performed by an MD when the APP was not available (MD group). Patient satisfaction scores were compared before and after the APP-directed CVs were performed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients discharged in sinus rhythm was the same in the APP group as it was in the MD group (95% vs. 96%, respectively; p = 0.49). There were 4 adverse events in the CVs performed by the APP: 1 transient ischemic attack and 3 occurrences of bradycardia requiring atropine or other medication. There was 1 adverse event in the MD group, which was hypotension requiring vasopressor initiation. Patient satisfaction scores were stable after initiation of APP-driven cardioversions. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate clinical training, an APP can safely perform CVs autonomously, using a protocol that includes a guideline-directed procedural checklist and physician supervision, with excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of elective electrical cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) when performed autonomously by a trained advanced practice provider (APP) using a guideline-directed protocol. BACKGROUND:APPs have emerged as an integral part of the cardiovascular team. METHODS: A licensed advanced practice nurse-clinical nurse specialist was trained and obtained credentials to perform CVs. The advanced practice nurse performed 415 CVs autonomously (APP group) in a noninvasive procedure room with an electrophysiologist (EP) immediately available in an adjacent electrophysiology laboratory. The APP performed a history and physical examination, obtained informed consent, reviewed each patient with the supervising EP, and performed the CV. An anesthesiologist administered sedation. Outcomes were compared with 387 CVs performed by an MD when the APP was not available (MD group). Patient satisfaction scores were compared before and after the APP-directed CVs were performed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients discharged in sinus rhythm was the same in the APP group as it was in the MD group (95% vs. 96%, respectively; p = 0.49). There were 4 adverse events in the CVs performed by the APP: 1 transient ischemic attack and 3 occurrences of bradycardia requiring atropine or other medication. There was 1 adverse event in the MD group, which was hypotension requiring vasopressor initiation. Patient satisfaction scores were stable after initiation of APP-driven cardioversions. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate clinical training, an APP can safely perform CVs autonomously, using a protocol that includes a guideline-directed procedural checklist and physician supervision, with excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.
Authors: Jean C Nuñez-Garcia; Antonio Sánchez-Puente; Jesús Sampedro-Gómez; Victor Vicente-Palacios; Manuel Jiménez-Navarro; Armando Oterino-Manzanas; Javier Jiménez-Candil; P Ignacio Dorado-Diaz; Pedro L Sánchez Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-07 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Herman G Kreeftenberg; Jeroen T Aarts; Alexander J G H Bindels; Nardo J M van der Meer; Peter H J van der Voort Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2020-04-29
Authors: Rachel M Kaplan; Celso L Diaz; Theresa Strzelczyk; Cindy You; Basil Saour; Michelle Fine; Amar Trivedi; Mark J Shen; Prasongchai Sattayaprasert; Alexandru B Chicos; Rishi Arora; Susan Kim; Albert Lin; Nishant Verma; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 3.133