Literature DB >> 29759627

Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment.

Daniel J Cantillon1, Derek V Exner2, Nima Badie3, Kevin Davis3, Ning Yan Gu3, Yelena Nabutovsky3, Rahul Doshi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectively characterize transvenous pacemaker (TVP) complications and associated health care costs in a large-scale U.S. patient cohort.
BACKGROUND: TVP complications have previously been shown to affect more than 1 in 10 patients but may be underestimated. Pacemakers are widely implanted across community and urban hospitals by operators of varying specialization and experience.
METHODS: Truven Health MarketScan databases track U.S. health care claims and encounters of private or Medicare supplemental insurance. Patients implanted with de dual- and single-chamber TVPs between April 2010 and March 2014 and over 1 year of pre-implantation MarketScan enrollment were identified. International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to extract relevant comorbidities and complications. Incremental adjusted cost analysis was performed for acute complications, defined as those occurring within 30 days of implantation.
RESULTS: Among 72,701 TVP implantations (mean age 75 ± 12 years, 55% men, 13% single chamber) with 1.5 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, acute complications (0 to 1 month) occurred in 7.7% of single- and 9.1% of dual-chamber TVPs and long-term complications (1 to 36 months) in 6.4% and 5.9% of single- and dual-chamber TVPs, respectively. The net 3-year event rates were approximately 15% and 16%. The incidence and incremental cost of complications are considerable. Most common acute complications include thoracic trauma (3.71%, $70,114), leads requiring revision (3.51%, $9,296), and infection (1.15%, $80,247). Long-term complications are attributed to leads (2.84%), infection (2.42%), and pocket (0.96%).
CONCLUSIONS: Claims data suggest that TVP complications are more common than previously reported, affecting nearly 1 in 6 patients by 3 years and contributing to considerable incremental U.S. health care cost.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; pacemaker; transvenous pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29759627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vincent Chauvette; Amine Mazine; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

2.  Early Versus Delayed Pacemaker for Heart Block After Valve Surgery: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Zachary Tyerman; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; Leora T Yarboro; Nicholas R Teman; Tanya Wancheck; Gorav Ailawadi; Nishaki K Mehta
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Implementing Biological Pacemakers: Design Criteria for Successful.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Komosa; David W Wolfson; Michael Bressan; Hee Cheol Cho; Brenda M Ogle
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Naoki Misumida; Mariah Pagath; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; Ryan E Wilson; Sun Moon Kim; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Claude S Elayi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Leadless pacemakers: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Neal Bhatia; Mikhael El-Chami
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Complications and prognosis of patients undergoing apical or septal right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Nick B Spath; Kelvin Wang; Sowmya Venkatasumbramanian; Omar Fersia; David E Newby; Chris Ce Lang; Neil R Grubb; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-02-09

7.  Contemporary practice pattern of permanent pacing for conduction disorders in inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Naoki Misumida; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; John Catanzaro; Farshid Etaee; Sun Moon Kim; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Khaled M Ziada; Claude S Elayi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Leadless pacemaker implant with concomitant atrioventricular node ablation: Experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Timothy Shinn; Sundeep Bansal; Jose L Martinez-Sande; Nicolas Clementy; Ralph Augostini; Bipin Ravindran; Venkata Sagi; Hemanth Ramanna; Christophe Garweg; Paul R Roberts; Kyoko Soejima; Kurt Stromberg; Dedra H Fagan; Nicky Zuniga; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-23

9.  Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement.

Authors:  Gemma Pelargonio; Roberto Scacciavillani; Luca Donisi; Maria Lucia Narducci; Cristina Aurigemma; Gaetano Pinnacchio; Gianluigi Bencardino; Francesco Perna; Francesco Raffaele Spera; Gianluca Comerci; Eleonora Ruscio; Enrico Romagnoli; Filippo Crea; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22

10.  Leadless or Conventional Transvenous Ventricular Permanent Pacemakers: A Nationwide Matched Control Study.

Authors:  Alexandre Bodin; Nicolas Clementy; Arnaud Bisson; Bertrand Pierre; Julien Herbert; Dominique Babuty; Laurent Fauchier
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.106

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.