OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess sex-related differences in sporadic cases of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested male predominance in ARVC. However, the impact of sex on the heterogeneous clinical profile and prognosis of ARVC were not fully recognized. METHODS: The study population included 110 patients with ARVC who fulfilled the revised Task Force criteria (median age 48 years [interquartile range (IQR): 36 to 57 years]). All patients were sporadic cases without family history of ARVC. Male patients had a 3:1 predominance (75%). Ninety-seven patients (88%) were considered to have "definite" ARVC based on revised Task Force criteria. RESULTS: At the initial evaluation, there were no significant sex-related differences in age, 12-lead electrocardiogram findings, late potentials by signal-averaged electrocardiogram, left ventricular ejection fraction, or right ventricular ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 10.0 years (IQR: 5.2 to 15.6 years), 18 patients died from cardiac causes. Kaplan-Meier analysis, considering patients' lives since birth, revealed that male patients had a significantly higher risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation than did female patients (56% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), whereas female patients had a significantly higher risk of heart failure (HF) death or heart transplantation (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, female sex was an independent risk factor for HF death or heart transplantation due to HF (hazard ratio: 6.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 40.2; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with sporadic ARVC, men had a significantly higher risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, whereas women had a significantly higher risk of HF death or heart transplantation due to HF.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess sex-related differences in sporadic cases of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested male predominance in ARVC. However, the impact of sex on the heterogeneous clinical profile and prognosis of ARVC were not fully recognized. METHODS: The study population included 110 patients with ARVC who fulfilled the revised Task Force criteria (median age 48 years [interquartile range (IQR): 36 to 57 years]). All patients were sporadic cases without family history of ARVC. Male patients had a 3:1 predominance (75%). Ninety-seven patients (88%) were considered to have "definite" ARVC based on revised Task Force criteria. RESULTS: At the initial evaluation, there were no significant sex-related differences in age, 12-lead electrocardiogram findings, late potentials by signal-averaged electrocardiogram, left ventricular ejection fraction, or right ventricular ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 10.0 years (IQR: 5.2 to 15.6 years), 18 patients died from cardiac causes. Kaplan-Meier analysis, considering patients' lives since birth, revealed that male patients had a significantly higher risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation than did female patients (56% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), whereas female patients had a significantly higher risk of heart failure (HF) death or heart transplantation (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, female sex was an independent risk factor for HF death or heart transplantation due to HF (hazard ratio: 6.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 40.2; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with sporadic ARVC, men had a significantly higher risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, whereas women had a significantly higher risk of HF death or heart transplantation due to HF.