Literature DB >> 29759443

Optimizing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Remote Monitoring: A Practical Guide.

Sylvain Ploux1, Niraj Varma2, Marc Strik3, Arnaud Lazarus4, Pierre Bordachar5.   

Abstract

Remote monitoring (RM) receives a Class I: Level of Evidence: A recommendation for the follow-up of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, positioning the technology as standard of care. RM is often seen and sold as a plug-and-play technology, whereas fundamental differences exist in the philosophy and conception of the 5 main RM systems. The capabilities and limitations of the different RM systems need to be understood and taken into account when the decision is made to remotely manage an individual patient. The purpose of this review is to provide to the cardiologist practical information about RM systems' specificities with respect to the different technical and clinical alerts. Clinically based indications and programming suggestions are provided.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; lead failure; remote monitoring; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29759443     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  6 in total

1.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead?

Authors:  Frieder Braunschweig; Stefan D Anker; Jochen Proff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Implant-based multi-parameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure and a defibrillator with vs. without cardiac resynchronization therapy option: a subanalysis of the IN-TIME trial.

Authors:  Johann Christoph Geller; Thorsten Lewalter; Niels Eske Bruun; Milos Taborsky; Frank Bode; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Christoph Stellbrink; Steffen Schön; Holger Mühling; Hanno Oswald; Sebastian Reif; Stefan Kääb; Peter Illes; Jochen Proff; Nikolaos Dagres; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Challenges in managing a remote monitoring device clinic.

Authors:  Margaret Harvey; Amber Seiler
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 4.  The Importance of Telemedicine during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Raffaele Galiero; Pia Clara Pafundi; Riccardo Nevola; Luca Rinaldi; Carlo Acierno; Alfredo Caturano; Teresa Salvatore; Luigi Elio Adinolfi; Ciro Costagliola; Ferdinando Carlo Sasso
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.011

5.  Patients' and Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators in Heart Failure: Cross-Sectional, Descriptive, Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Maria Liljeroos; Ingela Thylén; Anna Strömberg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Outpatient Initiation of Sotalol in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Utility of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices for Therapy Monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel A N Mascarenhas; Praveen C Mudumbi; Bharat K Kantharia
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.