Literature DB >> 29759311

Quadripolar Leads in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Wouter M van Everdingen1, Maarten J Cramer2, Pieter A Doevendans2, Mathias Meine2.   

Abstract

Despite the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure and conduction delay, a considerable number of patients do not respond substantially. Left ventricular lead position is an important factor in response, restricted by the patient's specific anatomy and local pathophysiology. Quadripolar leads could enhance response to CRT, offering 4 pacing locations along the distal end of the lead. Several quadripolar leads are available, all with different shapes and electrode spacing. Electrodes can be positioned in an ideal pacing location, determined by delayed mechanical or electrical activation, and away from phrenic nerve stimulation, high pacing thresholds, and fibrosis. Implantation is safe, with comparable or even lower complication rates compared with standard bipolar leads. Studies on biventricular pacing with quadripolar leads show apparent variations in acute hemodynamic response between pacing configurations, implying a patient-specific response. Pacing with an optimal pacing vector of a quadripolar lead benefits acute hemodynamic response. Multipoint pacing, pacing the left ventricle with 2 of 4 electrodes, could further enhance response. However, larger trials are needed to confirm these results, and results on long-term outcome of CRT with quadripolar leads and the benefit of multipoint pacing are warranted. We conclude that quadripolar leads are an important improvement in the treatment of heart failure patients with CRT.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; lead; multipoint pacing; phrenic nerve stimulation; quadripolar

Year:  2015        PMID: 29759311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Syed Yaseen Naqvi; Anas Jawaid; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

2.  Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study.

Authors:  Ajay Raj; Ajay Pratap Singh; Ranjit Kumar Nath; Neeraj Pandit; Puneet Aggarwal; Ashok Kumar Thakur; Rajeev Bharadwaj; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-02-23

3.  Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Niedermeier; Laura Vitali-Serdoz; Theodor Fischlein; Wolfgang Kirste; Veronica Buia; Janusch Walaschek; Harald Rittger; Dirk Bastian
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac resynchronization therapy implant impairs the recovery of ejection fraction in responders.

Authors:  Teresa Strisciuglio; Giuseppe Ammirati; Valerio Pergola; Livio Imparato; Cristina Carella; Elisabeta Koci; Rosaria Chiappetti; Fabio Giovanni Abbate; Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia; Aniello Viggiano; Bruno Trimarco; Antonio Rapacciuolo
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.