| Literature DB >> 29758969 |
Xin Liu1, Qisong Wang2, Dan Liu2, Yuan Wang3, Yan Zhang2, Ou Bai4, Jinwei Sun2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human emotion classification is traditionally achieved using multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, which requires costly equipment and complex classification algorithms.Entities:
Keywords: ECG; EEG; Emotion; respiration; support vector machine; wearable sensors
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29758969 PMCID: PMC6004961 DOI: 10.3233/THC-174747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Health Care ISSN: 0928-7329 Impact factor: 1.285
Figure 1.System diagram.
Figure 2.Sensor node.
Signal accuracy and sampling rate
| Signal | Accuracy | Rate (Hz) |
|---|---|---|
| EEG | 0.2 | 1000 |
| ECG | 4.3 | 500 |
| RESP | 5% | 500 |
| Head posture | 0.2Deg/0.004g | 100 |
Figure 3.System set up.
Figure 4.Experiment process.
Selected film slice example
| Film slice | Emotion |
|---|---|
| Tangshan Earthquake | Negative |
| King of comedy | Positive |
| Guilin Scenery | Neutral |
| Lost in Thailand | Positive |
| Assembly | Negative |
| China from above | Neutral |
Figure 5.Experiment process.
Selected film slice example
| Signal | Feature | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| EEG | Percentage PSD |
|
| Standard deviation | Estd | |
| Average power | Epow | |
| Mean of the absolute value | Emean | |
| Blink frequency | Fb | |
| ECG | Heart rate | HR |
| Heart rate stability | HRstd | |
| Power | Hpow | |
| RESP | Respiratory rate | RR |
| Respiratory stability | RRstd | |
| Absolute mean of second order difference |
| |
| Percentage PSD |
| |
| Standard deviation of second order difference |
| |
| Head posture | Posture stability | Pstd |
Figure 6.HRstd average values in different emotions.
Figure 7.RRstd average values in different emotions.
Figure 8.Pstd average values in different emotions.
Classification accuacy of with another feature
| Another feature | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|
| -( | 72.5 |
| Estd | 78.1 |
| Epow | 74.6 |
| Emean | 73.3 |
| Fb | 75.6 |
| HR | 69.0 |
| HRstd | 84.2 |
| Hpow | 70.4 |
| RR | 71.9 |
| RRstd | 75.5 |
|
| 85.2 |
|
| 72.7 |
|
| 86.0 |
| Pstd | 77.6 |
Figure 9.Classification scheme.
Classification accuracy and time consuming
| Subject | Proposed method | Classical method | ||
| Accuracy (%) | Time (second) | Accuracy (%) | Time (second) | |
| 1 | 92.5 | 17 | 89.3 | 339 |
| 2 | 85.7 | 18 | 78.3 | 342 |
| 3 | 90.5 | 18 | 87.4 | 349 |
| 4 | 90.2 | 19 | 85.5 | 378 |
| 5 | 85.3 | 18 | 83.2 | 351 |
| 6 | 84.2 | 18 | 83.7 | 343 |