Literature DB >> 29758184

Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty Button Cultures in The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II: A Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Voriconazole Versus Placebo.

Julie Cho1, N Venkatesh Prajna2, Prajna Lalitha2, Revathi Rajaraman2, Tiruvengada Krishnan2, Yijie Brittany Lin3, Kathryn J Ray1, Thomas M Lietman4, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare oral voriconazole vs placebo in addition to topical antifungals in the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.
DESIGN: Non-prespecified, secondary case-control analysis from a multicenter, double-masked, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: Study Participants: Patients with smear-positive filamentous fungal ulcers and visual acuity of 20/400 or worse who eventuated to therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK). INTERVENTION: Study participants were randomized to oral voriconazole vs oral placebo; all received topical antifungal drops. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TPK button culture positivity.
RESULTS: A total of 95 of 194 (49.5%) study participants enrolled at Madurai, Coimbatore, or Pondicherry, India eventuated to TPK in an average of 20.9 days (standard deviation 15.2 days, range 2-71 days). TPK button cultures were available for 67 of 95 (71%) of the TPKs performed and were positive for filamentous fungus in 45 of 67 (67%) cases. For each 1-day increase in the time to TPK there was 0.94-fold decreased odds of fungal culture positivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.98, P = .005). Those randomized to oral voriconazole had 1.26-fold increased odds of TPK button culture positivity after controlling for time to TPK and baseline organism, but this was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.32-4.87; P = .74). Those who underwent TPK for lack of response to medical therapy were 10.64-fold more likely to be culture positive than if the indication for surgery was perforation and this was statistically significant (95% CI 2.16-51.70; P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no benefit to adding oral voriconazole to topical antifungal agents in the treatment of severe filamentous fungal ulcers. Infection rather than inflammation appears to be the reason for the worsening clinical picture in many of these patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29758184      PMCID: PMC6584760          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biological basis for syphilis.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lafond; Sheila A Lukehart
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Adjunctive Oral Voriconazole Treatment of Fusarium Keratitis: A Secondary Analysis From the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II.

Authors:  N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Revathi Rajaraman; Sushila Patel; Ranjeet Shah; Muthiah Srinivasan; Lumbini Devi; Manoranjan Das; Kathryn J Ray; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  The Utility of Repeat Culture in Fungal Corneal Ulcer Management: A Secondary Analysis of the MUTT-I Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ray; Prajna Lalitha; N Venkatesh Prajna; Revathi Rajaraman; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Muthiah Srinivasan; Peter Ryg; Stephen McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Revathi Rajaraman; Sushila Patel; Muthiah Srinivasan; Manoranjan Das; Kathryn J Ray; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Current Thoughts in Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Zubair Ansari; Darlene Miller; Anat Galor
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive microbial keratitis: cause of culture negativity, clinical features and final outcome.

Authors:  Yogesh Bhadange; Sujata Das; Mahesh K Kasav; Srikant K Sahu; Savitri Sharma
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The role of smears, cultures, and antibiotic sensitivity testing in the management of suspected infectious keratitis.

Authors:  S D McLeod; A Kolahdouz-Isfahani; K Rostamian; C W Flowers; P P Lee; P J McDonnell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lamprini Papaioannou; Michael Miligkos; Miltiadis Papathanassiou
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Evaluation of agent and host factors in progression of mycotic keratitis: A histologic and microbiologic study of 167 corneal buttons.

Authors:  Geeta Kashyap Vemuganti; Prashant Garg; Usha Gopinathan; Thomas J Naduvilath; Rajesh K John; Rajeev Buddi; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Correlations between Microbiological Outcomes and Clinical Responses in Patients with Severe Pneumonia.

Authors:  Sungmin Kiem; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2013-09-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.