E N Cresswell1, S P McDonough2, S E Palmer3, C J Hernandez4, H L Reesink1,5. 1. Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 2. Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 3. Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 4. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 5. Equine and Farm Animal Hospital, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fracture of the proximal sesamoid bones continues to be the most common fatal musculoskeletal injury in US racehorses. Identifying factors that influence fracture risk could lead to screening techniques to reduce catastrophic injury rates and improve animal welfare. OBJECTIVES: To identify morphological differences between proximal sesamoid bones of the contralateral limb of fracture and control horses and assess the feasibility of computed tomography (CT) to detect traits associated with proximal sesamoid bone fracture. We hypothesised that horses with proximal sesamoid bone fracture would have greater bone density. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cadaver morphological study. METHODS: Proximal sesamoid bone morphology was measured using high-resolution micro-CT images from 16 Thoroughbred racehorses (eight fracture, eight control) euthanised on New York racetracks. Nominal logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to assess the ability of CT-derived morphological traits to accurately classify fracture horses vs. controls. RESULTS: Bone volume fraction was greater in the fracture group (90.39 ± 1.76%) as compared to controls (87.20 ± 2.79%, P<0.0001). Bone volume fraction, bone width, trabecular thickness and degree of anisotropy were significantly different between fracture and control horses. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that a combined model that incorporates bone volume fraction and width can identify fracture from control horses with an area under the curve of 0.938, indicating high accuracy at classifying fracture horses from controls. MAIN LIMITATIONS: The number of horses per group is small, although the total number of sesamoids imaged is reasonable (n = 62). In vivo CT at the resolution performed in this study is currently unattainable; however, density and width could be measured with quantitative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in proximal sesamoid bone morphology were identified between fracture and control horses. As improved technology becomes accessible, quantitative CT could potentially be used as a clinical imaging technique to estimate proximal sesamoid bone fracture risk in Thoroughbred racehorses.
BACKGROUND: Fracture of the proximal sesamoid bones continues to be the most common fatal musculoskeletal injury in US racehorses. Identifying factors that influence fracture risk could lead to screening techniques to reduce catastrophic injury rates and improve animal welfare. OBJECTIVES: To identify morphological differences between proximal sesamoid bones of the contralateral limb of fracture and control horses and assess the feasibility of computed tomography (CT) to detect traits associated with proximal sesamoid bone fracture. We hypothesised that horses with proximal sesamoid bone fracture would have greater bone density. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cadaver morphological study. METHODS: Proximal sesamoid bone morphology was measured using high-resolution micro-CT images from 16 Thoroughbred racehorses (eight fracture, eight control) euthanised on New York racetracks. Nominal logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to assess the ability of CT-derived morphological traits to accurately classify fracture horses vs. controls. RESULTS: Bone volume fraction was greater in the fracture group (90.39 ± 1.76%) as compared to controls (87.20 ± 2.79%, P<0.0001). Bone volume fraction, bone width, trabecular thickness and degree of anisotropy were significantly different between fracture and control horses. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that a combined model that incorporates bone volume fraction and width can identify fracture from control horses with an area under the curve of 0.938, indicating high accuracy at classifying fracture horses from controls. MAIN LIMITATIONS: The number of horses per group is small, although the total number of sesamoids imaged is reasonable (n = 62). In vivo CT at the resolution performed in this study is currently unattainable; however, density and width could be measured with quantitative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in proximal sesamoid bone morphology were identified between fracture and control horses. As improved technology becomes accessible, quantitative CT could potentially be used as a clinical imaging technique to estimate proximal sesamoid bone fracture risk in Thoroughbred racehorses.
Authors: Duncan J Pearce; Peta L Hitchens; Fatemeh Malekipour; Babatunde Ayodele; Peter Vee Sin Lee; R Chris Whitton Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-06-28
Authors: Francesco Maria Achille Consoli; Yara Bernaldo de Quirós; Manuel Arbelo; Stefania Fulle; Marco Marchisio; Mario Encinoso; Antonio Fernandez; Miguel A Rivero Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 3.231