| Literature DB >> 29758052 |
Claudia Agabiti-Rosei1, Valentina Trapletti1, Silvia Piantoni2, Paolo Airò2, Angela Tincani2, Carolina De Ciuceis1, Claudia Rossini1, Francesco Mittempergher3, Amin Titi3, Nazario Portolani3, Stefano Caletti1, Maria Antonietta Coschignano1, Enzo Porteri1, Guido A M Tiberio3, Paola Pileri1, Leonardo Solaini3, Rajesh Kumar2, Silvia Ministrini3, Enrico Agabiti Rosei1, Damiano Rizzoni1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It has been previously demonstrated that T lymphocytes may be involved in the development of hypertension and microvascular remodeling, and that circulating T effector lymphocytes may be increased in hypertension. In particular, Th1 and Th 17 lymphocytes may contribute to the progression of hypertension and microvascular damage while T-regulatory (Treg) lymphocytes seem to be protective in this regard. However, no data is available about patients with severe obesity, in which pronounced microvascular alterations were observed. DESIGN AND METHODS: We have investigated 32 severely obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, as well as 24 normotensive lean subjects and 12 hypertensive lean subjects undergoing an elective surgical intervention. A peripheral blood sample was obtained before surgery for assessment of CD4+ T lymphocyte subpopulations. Lymphocyte phenotype was evaluated by flow cytometry in order to assess T-effector and Treg lymphocytes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29758052 PMCID: PMC5951588 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow cytometry evaluation (dot blot) in representative subjects of two subgroups (LEAN NORMOTENSIVES AND OBESE PATIENTS).
Dot plot analysis is of CD4+ gated lymphocytes. At least 20.000 events were considered.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the population evaluated.
| Lean normotensive subjects (n = 24) | Lean hypertensive patients (n = 12) | Obese patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14M (58%) | 7 M (58%) | 7 M (28%) | |
| 48.1±15.0 | 60.9±8.83 | 42.0±14.5 | |
| 25.1±2.92 | 26.2±3.84 | 42.9±5.07 | |
| 122±10.9 | 134±17.0 | 129±18.1 | |
| 76.3±9.35 | 76.6±9.96 | 82.0±12.6 | |
| 7.13±7.31 | 1.55±1.12 | 8.41±4.71 | |
| 90.7±11.9 | 98.4±15.3 | 103±37.5 | |
| 0.81±0.23 | 0.95 ±0.23 | 0.72±0.11 | |
| 94.9±23.6 | 76.9 ±16.5 | 116±34.8 | |
| 37.6±14.0 | 41.6±13.6 | 30.1±8.53 | |
| 4.52±1.42 | 5.54±1.84 | 4.68±1.28 | |
| 141±2.00 | 142±1.53 | 140±2.06 | |
| 3.87±0.47 | 3.93±0.47 | 3.80±0.28 | |
| 105±2.43 | 105±2.31 | 105±1.74 | |
| 76.7±33.9 | 93.2±30.8 | 119±57.7 | |
| 179±25.2 | 180±34.2 | 185±28.8 |
* P<0.05,
*** P<0.001 vs. Lean normotensive subjects;
# P<0.05,
## P<0.001,
### P<0.001 vs. Lean hypertensive patients. Creatinine clearance: MDRD formula. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Lymphocyte subpopulations in the different groups.
| Lean normotensives | Lean hypertensives | Obese patients | Obese normotensive patients (n = 18) | Obese hypertensive patients (n = 14) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tregs (% CD4+) | 4.11±1.60 | 4.64±1.66 | 2.69±1.81 | 2.73±1.51 | 2.64±2.19 |
| 45.4±24.3 | 45.4±23.8 | 27.3±21.1 | 30.4±20.7 | 23.2±21.8 | |
| 22.1±10.1 | 18.1±13.1 | 13.3±12.9 | 12.4±9.64 | 14.7±16.8 | |
| 10.6±7.75 | 9.71±8.87 | 3.87±5.28 | 4.57±6.16 | 2.96±3.90 | |
| 32.3±13.8 | 32.8±17.8 | 22.7±15.2 | 18.8±9.25 | 28.1±20.1 | |
| 14.7±10.2 | 14.2±9.08 | 6.10±8.08 | 5.94±6.18 | 6.31±10.3 | |
| 24.4±9.96 | 26.8±12.5 | 34.1±13.3 | 35.0±12.9 | 32.8±14.3 |
Tregs = regulatory T cells; CM = central memory; EM = effector memory.
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01,
***p<0.001 vs. lean normotensives;
#p<0.05,
##p<0.01 vs. lean hypertensives. P = NS between obese normotensive and hypertensive patients. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Fig 2Correlation between body mass index (BMI) and circulating Treg naive (cell/μL) in the whole population of 68 subjects and patients.
Fig 3Correlation between body mass index (BMI) and circulating CD4+ effector memory (EM) cells (% CD4+) in the whole population of 68 subjects and patients.
Statistically significant correlations between lymphocyte subpopulations and metabolic parameters.
| Population | 1st variable | 2nd variable | r | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects and patients, n = 68 | CD4+ EM (% CD4+) | Serum cholesterol | 0.24 | P<0.05 |
| All subjects and patients, n = 68 | CD4+ EM (% CD4+) | Serum glucose | 0.25 | P<0.05 |
| Lean normotensives n = 24 | CD4+ EM (% CD4+) | Serum glucose | 0.40 | P<0.05 |
| Lean hypertensives n = 12 | CD4+ EM (% CD4+) | Serum cholesterol | 0.62 | P<0.05 |
| Obese normotensive patients, n = 18 | CD4+ EM (% CD4+) | Serum triglycerides | 0.69 | P<0.001 |
| All subjects and patients, n = 68 | Tregs (%) | Serum triglycerides | -0.27 | P<0.05 |
| All subjects and patients, n = 68 | Tregs CM (% Tregs) | Serum triglycerides | -0.23 | P<0.05 |
| Lean hypertensives n = 24 | Tregs (%) | Serum cholesterol | -0.57 | P<0.05 |
| Lean hypertensives n = 24 | Tregs naïve (% Tregs) | Serum cholesterol | -0.81 | P<0.001 |
| Lean hypertensives n = 24 | Tregs naïve (cells/μL) | Serum cholesterol | -0.70 | P<0.01 |
| Obese normotensive patients, n = 18 | Tregs naïve (cells/μL) | Serum triglycerides | -0.56 | P<0.01 |