| Literature DB >> 29758001 |
Yuzhu He1,2, Yahui Jin3,4,5, Xiumei Wang6, Shenglian Yao7, Yuanyuan Li8,9, Qiong Wu10, Guowu Ma11, Fuzhai Cui12, Huiying Liu13.
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique is widely used in the treatment of bone defects caused by peri-implantitis, periodontal disease, etc. However, the GBR membranes commonly used in clinical treatments currently have no antibacterial activity. Therefore, in this study, sequential layer-by-layer electrospinning and electrospraying techniques were utilized to prepare a gelatin (Gln) and chitosan (CS) composite GBR membrane containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHAp) and antimicrobial peptide (Pac-525)-loaded PLGA microspheres (AMP@PLGA-MS), which was supposed to have osteogenic and antibacterial activities. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation showed that the morphology of the nanofibers and microspheres could be successfully produced. The diameters of the electrospun fibers with and without nHAp were 359 ± 174 nm and 409 ± 197 nm, respectively, and the mechanical properties of the membrane were measured according to the tensile stress-strain curve. Both the involvement of nHAp and the chemical crosslinking were able to enhance their tensile strength. In vitro cell culture of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) indicated that the Gln/CS composite membrane had an ideal biocompatibility with good cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation. In addition, the Gln/CS membrane containing nHAp could promote osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs. Furthermore, according to the in vitro drug release assay and antibacterial experiments, the composite GBR membrane containing AMP@PLGA-MS exhibited a long-term sustained release of Pac-525, which had bactericidal activity within one week and antibacterial activity for up to one month against two kinds of bacteria, S. aureus and E. coli. Our results suggest that the antimicrobial peptide-loaded Gln/CS composite membrane (AMP@PLGA-MS@Gln/CS/nHAp) has a great promise in bone generation-related applications for the unique functions of guiding bone regeneration and inhibiting bacterial infection as well.Entities:
Keywords: GBR membrane; PLGA microsphere; antimicrobial peptides; electrospinning; electrospraying
Year: 2018 PMID: 29758001 PMCID: PMC5977341 DOI: 10.3390/nano8050327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the fabrication process and structure of the AMP@PLGA-MS@Gln/CS/nHAp composite membrane by sequential layer-by-layer electrospinning and electrospraying. This biodegradable membrane consists of two layers: the barrier layer (Gln/CS nanofibers) and osteogenic layer (Gln/CS/nHAp nanofibers). The AMP-loaded PLGA microspheres were electrosprayed alternately during the electrospinning, and were therefore embedded within the membrane.
Figure 2The gross and SEM morphologies of the Gln/CS composite membrane. (A) The barrier layer of Gln/CS nanofibers before crosslinking; (B) The barrier layer of Gln/CS nanofibers after crosslinking; (C) Electrosprayed AMP@PLGA microspheres; (D,E) The osteogenic layer of Gln/CS/nHAp by magnetic stirring (D) and ultrasonic dispersion (E); (F) The typical cross-sectional morphology of the membrane; (G,H) The typical morphologies of the AMP@PLGA MSs embedded within the membrane; (I) Gross image of the Gln/CS composite membrane.
WCA and mechanical property of the barrier and osteogenic layers.
| Test | Type | Barrier Layer | Osteogenic Layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| WCA (°) | - | 73.17 ± 1.22 | 69.53 ± 0.31 |
| Tensile Strength (Mpa) | crosslinked | 5.11 ± 0.96 | 7.22 ± 1.49 |
| un-crosslinked | 3.15 ± 0.57* | 4.97 ± 2.43* |
* p < 0.05, vs. the same type of membrane layer after crosslinking.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of rBMSCs seeded on the barrier layer (A–C) and osteogenic layer (D–F) of the Gln/CS composite membrane after 1 d, 4 d, and 7 d of cell culture.
Figure 4CLSM micrographs of rBMSCs seeded on the barrier layer (A–C) and osteogenic layer (D–F) of the Gln/CS composite membrane after 1 d, 4 d, and 7 d of cell culture.
Figure 5Cell behaviors of rBMSCs cultured on the Gln/CS composite membrane. (A) Cell proliferation on the barrier layer, osteogenic layer and coverslip control by CCK-8 assay; (B) Osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs on the barrier layer, osteogenic layer and coverslip control by ALPase activity assay. * p < 0.05.
Figure 6In vitro release profile of Pac-525 from the Gln/CS composite membrane. (A) The concentration of released Pac-525; (B) Cumulative release percentage of Pac-525.
Figure 7The typical morphologies of the inhibition zone induced by the elution solutions of AMP@PLGA-MS@Gln/CS/nHAp composite membrane at the first week (A,B) and the fourth week (C,D) against E. coli (A,C) and S. aureus (C,D) after 3 days of incubation on agar plate.
The inhibition ratios and diameter of inhibition ring of the elution solutions extracted with different incubation times against E. coli and S. aureus.
| Bacterial Species | Inhibition Ratio | Diameter of Inhibition Ring | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st wk | 4th wk | 1st wk | 4th wk | |
| 94.61% | 68.26% | 11 cm | 9 cm | |
| 95.08% | 77.36% | 12 cm | 11 cm | |