Literature DB >> 29756447

Electrochemical Methodologies for the Detection of Pathogens.

Mandana Amiri1, Abolfazl Bezaatpour1, Hamed Jafari1, Rabah Boukherroub2, Sabine Szunerits2.   

Abstract

Bacterial infections remain one of the principal causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The number of deaths due to infections is declining every year by only 1% with a forecast of 13 million deaths in 2050. Among the 1400 recognized human pathogens, the majority of infectious diseases is caused by just a few, about 20 pathogens only. While the development of vaccinations and novel antibacterial drugs and treatments are at the forefront of research, and strongly financially supported by policy makers, another manner to limit and control infectious outbreaks is targeting the development and implementation of early warning systems, which indicate qualitatively and quantitatively the presence of a pathogen. As toxin contaminated food and drink are a potential threat to human health and consequently have a significant socioeconomic impact worldwide, the detection of pathogenic bacteria remains not only a big scientific challenge but also a practical problem of enormous significance. Numerous analytical methods, including conventional culturing and staining techniques as well as molecular methods based on polymerase chain reaction amplification and immunological assays, have emerged over the years and are used to identify and quantify pathogenic agents. While being highly sensitive in most cases, these approaches are highly time, labor, and cost consuming, requiring trained personnel to perform the frequently complex assays. A great challenge in this field is therefore to develop rapid, sensitive, specific, and if possible miniaturized devices to validate the presence of pathogens in cost and time efficient manners. Electrochemical sensors are well accepted powerful tools for the detection of disease-related biomarkers and environmental and organic hazards. They have also found widespread interest in the last years for the detection of waterborne and foodborne pathogens due to their label free character and high sensitivity. This Review is focused on the current electrochemical-based microorganism recognition approaches and putting them into context of other sensing devices for pathogens such as culturing the microorganism on agar plates and the polymer chain reaction (PCR) method, able to identify the DNA of the microorganism. Recent breakthroughs will be highlighted, including the utilization of microfluidic devices and immunomagnetic separation for multiple pathogen analysis in a single device. We will conclude with some perspectives and outlooks to better understand shortcomings. Indeed, there is currently no adequate solution that allows the selective and sensitive binding to a specific microorganism, that is fast in detection and screening, cheap to implement, and able to be conceptualized for a wide range of biologically relevant targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; electrochemistry; pathogen; sensing; toxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29756447     DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Sens        ISSN: 2379-3694            Impact factor:   7.711


  22 in total

1.  An impedimetric biosensor for E. coli O157:H7 based on the use of self-assembled gold nanoparticles and protein G.

Authors:  Donghai Lin; Rajesh G Pillai; William Edward Lee; Abebaw B Jemere
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection.

Authors:  Ellen Cesewski; Blake N Johnson
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Diagnosis of COVID-19, vitality of emerging technologies and preventive measures.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif; Yun Xu; Fei Xiao; Yimin Sun
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 13.273

4.  Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Patient Urine Samples Using Large Volume Free-Solution Light Scattering Microscopy.

Authors:  Manni Mo; Yunze Yang; Fenni Zhang; Wenwen Jing; Rafael Iriya; John Popovich; Shaopeng Wang; Thomas Grys; Shelley E Haydel; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Echem methods and electrode types of the current in vivo electrochemical sensing.

Authors:  Qiuye Song; Qianmin Li; Jiadong Yan; Yonggui Song
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 6.  A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors.

Authors:  Siva Kumar Krishnan; Eric Singh; Pragya Singh; Meyya Meyyappan; Hari Singh Nalwa
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Covalent capture and electrochemical quantification of pathogenic E. coli.

Authors:  Sarah H Klass; Laura E Sofen; Zachary F Hallberg; Tahoe A Fiala; Alexandra V Ramsey; Nicholas S Dolan; Matthew B Francis; Ariel L Furst
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.065

8.  Origami-based "Book" shaped three-dimensional electrochemical paper microdevice for sample-to-answer detection of pathogens.

Authors:  Tao He; Jingwen Li; Lisheng Liu; Shenguang Ge; Mei Yan; Haiyun Liu; Jinghua Yu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.361

9.  Metabolic Current Production by an Oral Biofilm Pathogen Corynebacterium matruchotii.

Authors:  Divya Naradasu; Waheed Miran; Akihiro Okamoto
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Detection of the Chilli Leaf Curl Virus Using an Attenuated Total Reflection-Mediated Localized Surface-Plasmon-Resonance-Based Optical Platform.

Authors:  Sonatan Das; Dilip Kumar Agarwal; Bikash Mandal; V Ramgopal Rao; Tapanendu Kundu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.