Clément Charbonnel1, Christophe Jego2, François Jourda3, Ulric Vinsonneau4, Philippe Garçon5, Guillaume Turlotte6, Jean François Rivière7, Marion Maurin8, Rémy Lubret9, Patrick Meimoun10, Chrystelle Akret11, Maxime Cournot12, Charles Sokic13, Laurent Michel14, Maryse Lescure15, David Kenizou16, Marie Melay17, Maxime Fayard18, Bruno Gallet19, Rémi Fouche20, Luc Janin-Manificat21, Nicolas Dijoux22, Anne Céline Martin23, Aurélia Tho-Agostini24, Hubert Mann25, Cécile Ricard11, Fernando Pico26,27, Jean Louis Georges1, Loïc Belle11, Patrick Jourdain28. 1. Department of Cardiology, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France. 2. Department of Cardiology, Toulon Inter-army Hospital, Toulon, France. 3. Department of Cardiology, Auxerre Hospital, Auxerre, France. 4. Department of Cardiology, Brest Inter-army Hospital, Brest, France. 5. Department of Cardiology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France. 6. Department of Cardiology, La Roche sur Yon Hospital, La Roche sur Yon, France. 7. Department of Cardiology, Pau Hospital, Pau, France. 8. Department of Cardiology, Papeete Hospital, Papeete, France. 9. Department of Cardiology, Boulogne sur mer Hospital, Boulogne sur mer, France. 10. Department of Cardiology, Compiègne Hospital, Compiègne, France. 11. Department of Cardiology, Annecy-Genevois Hospital, Annecy, France. 12. Department of Cardiology, Saint Paul Hospital, Saint Paul, France. 13. Department of Cardiology, Haguenau Hospital, Haguenau, France. 14. Department of Cardiology, Saint Lo Hospital, Saint Lo, France. 15. Department of Cardiology, Auch Hospital, Auch, France. 16. Department of Cardiology, Mulhouse Hospital, Mulhouse, France. 17. Department of Cardiology, Vichy Hospital, Vichy, France. 18. Department of Cardiology, Chalon sur Saone Hospital, Chalon sur Saone, France. 19. Department of Cardiology, Argenteuil Hospital, Argenteuil, France. 20. Department of Cardiology, Montbéliard Hospital, Montbéliard, France. 21. Department of Cardiology, Beaune Hospital, Beaune, France. 22. Department of Cardiology, Saint Pierre Hospital, Saint Pierre, France. 23. Department of Cardiology, Val de Grace Inter-army Hospital, Paris, France. 24. Department of Cardiology, Bastia Hospital, Bastia, France. 25. Department of Cardiology, Voiron Hospital, Voiron, France. 26. Department of Neurology, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France. 27. University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines and Paris Saclay, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France. 28. Department of Cardiology, Pontoise Hospital, Pontoise, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after brain ischemia (BI) remains a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of TEE and to build a score that could help physicians to identify which patients should better benefit from TEE. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study included patients over 18 years old, hospitalized for BI. TEE findings were judged discriminant if the results showed important information leading to major changes in the management of patients. Most patients with patent foramen ovale were excluded. Variables independently associated with a discriminant TEE were used to build the prediction model. RESULTS: Of the entire population (1479 patients), 255 patients (17%) were classified in the discriminant TEE group. Five parameters were selected as predictors of a discriminant TEE. Accordingly, the ADAM-C score could be calculated as follows: Score = 4 (if age ≥60) + 2 (if diabetes) + 2 (if aortic stenosis from any degrees) + 1 (if multi-territory stroke) + 2 (if history of coronary artery disease). At a threshold lower than 3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of detecting discriminant TEE were 88% (95% CI 85-90), 44% (95% CI 41-47), 21% (95% CI 19-27), and 95% (95% CI 94-97), respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple score based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters can help physicians to identify patients who might not benefit from TEE. Indeed, a score lower than 3 has an interesting NPV of 95% (95% CI 94-97).
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after brain ischemia (BI) remains a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of TEE and to build a score that could help physicians to identify which patients should better benefit from TEE. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational study included patients over 18 years old, hospitalized for BI. TEE findings were judged discriminant if the results showed important information leading to major changes in the management of patients. Most patients with patent foramen ovale were excluded. Variables independently associated with a discriminant TEE were used to build the prediction model. RESULTS: Of the entire population (1479 patients), 255 patients (17%) were classified in the discriminant TEE group. Five parameters were selected as predictors of a discriminant TEE. Accordingly, the ADAM-C score could be calculated as follows: Score = 4 (if age ≥60) + 2 (if diabetes) + 2 (if aortic stenosis from any degrees) + 1 (if multi-territory stroke) + 2 (if history of coronary artery disease). At a threshold lower than 3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of detecting discriminant TEE were 88% (95% CI 85-90), 44% (95% CI 41-47), 21% (95% CI 19-27), and 95% (95% CI 94-97), respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple score based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters can help physicians to identify patients who might not benefit from TEE. Indeed, a score lower than 3 has an interesting NPV of 95% (95% CI 94-97).
Authors: Thomas R Meinel; Kristina Brignoli; Moritz Kielkopf; Leander Clenin; Morin Beyeler; Adrian Scutelnic; Bernhard Siepen; Madlaine Mueller; Martina Goeldlin; David Seiffge; Johannes Kaesmacher; Adnan Mujanovic; Nebiyat F Belachew; Urs Fischer; Marcel Arnold; Christoph Gräni; Christian Seiler; Eric Buffle; Simon Jung Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 6.106