Eric J Monroe1, Ethan J Speir2, C Matthew Hawkins2,3, Giri Shivaram4, Kevin S H Koo4, Anne E Gill2,3. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. eric.monroe@seattlechildrens.org. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data regarding transsplenic portal venous access for diagnostic imaging and endovascular intervention in children are limited, possibly due to concerns regarding high bleeding risks and resultant underutilization. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and utility of transsplenic splenoportography and portal venous interventions in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous transsplenic portal venous access and intervention at two large tertiary pediatric institutions between January 2012 and April 2017 was performed. Parameters assessed included procedural indications, procedural and relevant prior imaging, technical details of the procedures, laboratory values and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Transsplenic portal venous access was achieved in all patients. Diagnostic transsplenic splenoportography was performed in 22 patients and was 100% successful at providing the desired anatomical and functional information. Four transsplenic portal venous interventions were performed with 100% success: meso-Rex shunt angioplasty, snare targeted transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation through cavernous transformation, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for acute thrombosis, and transplant portal vein angioplasty. Intraperitoneal bleeding occurred in 2/26 (7.7%) and one case required transfusion (3.8%). No cases of hemorrhage were observed when transsplenic access size was 4 Fr or smaller. CONCLUSION: Transsplenic splenoportography in children is safe and effective when noninvasive imaging methods have yielded incomplete information. Additionally, a transsplenic approach has advantages for complex portal interventions. Bleeding risks are proportional to tract access size and may be mitigated by tract embolization.
BACKGROUND: Data regarding transsplenic portal venous access for diagnostic imaging and endovascular intervention in children are limited, possibly due to concerns regarding high bleeding risks and resultant underutilization. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and utility of transsplenic splenoportography and portal venous interventions in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous transsplenic portal venous access and intervention at two large tertiary pediatric institutions between January 2012 and April 2017 was performed. Parameters assessed included procedural indications, procedural and relevant prior imaging, technical details of the procedures, laboratory values and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Transsplenic portal venous access was achieved in all patients. Diagnostic transsplenic splenoportography was performed in 22 patients and was 100% successful at providing the desired anatomical and functional information. Four transsplenic portal venous interventions were performed with 100% success: meso-Rex shunt angioplasty, snare targeted transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation through cavernous transformation, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for acute thrombosis, and transplant portal vein angioplasty. Intraperitoneal bleeding occurred in 2/26 (7.7%) and one case required transfusion (3.8%). No cases of hemorrhage were observed when transsplenic access size was 4 Fr or smaller. CONCLUSION: Transsplenic splenoportography in children is safe and effective when noninvasive imaging methods have yielded incomplete information. Additionally, a transsplenic approach has advantages for complex portal interventions. Bleeding risks are proportional to tract access size and may be mitigated by tract embolization.
Authors: David J Tuite; Jay Rehman; Mervin H Davies; Jai V Patel; Anthony A Nicholson; David O Kessel Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.464