| Literature DB >> 29755874 |
Serap Çuhadar1, Ayşenur Atay1, Gülcan Sağlam1, Mehmet Köseoğlu1, Levent Cuhadar2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess whether choices of physical activity, smoking status, and parental education and income were correlated with the health status of young adult males which are important for preventive health policy.Entities:
Keywords: Turkey; educational status; lipoproteins; physical education and training; smoking; social class
Year: 2013 PMID: 29755874 PMCID: PMC5927765 DOI: 10.5195/cajgh.2013.44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Asian J Glob Health ISSN: 2166-7403
Demographic and biochemical characteristics of study participants.
| Variable | Males n=491 |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mean Age (range) | 21(18–29) |
|
| |
| Body mass index (SD, kg/m2) | 23.3(2.24) |
|
| |
| BMI >25 | 25.3% |
|
| |
| Total cholesterol (SD, mmol/L) | 3.94(0.75) |
|
| |
| HDL-cholesterol (SD, mmol/L) | 1.20(0.25) |
|
| |
| LDL-cholesterol (SD, mmol/L) | 2.28(0.65) |
|
| |
| Triglycerides (range, mmol/L) | 0.87(0.23–4.09) |
|
| |
| Total cholesterol/HDL (SD) cholesterol ratio | 3.5(1.0) |
|
| |
| Cigarette smoking (%) | 25.1 |
|
| |
| Physically inactive (%) | 18.7 |
|
| |
| Paternal education (%) | |
| Lower | 39.3 |
| Medium | 22.6 |
| Higher | 38.1 |
|
| |
| Maternal education (%) | |
| Lower | 76.8 |
| Medium | 14.5 |
| Higher | 8.8 |
|
| |
| Household income (%) | |
| Lower | 47.5 |
| Intermediate | 40.3 |
| Higher | 12.2 |
Abbreviations: HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.
Values are means±standard deviationor percentages. Means were compared by t -test, and percentages were analyzed by x2- test. Statistically significant p values are marked in bold.
median(min-max) values for non-Gaussian distributions
Weight (kg)/height (m)2
One or more cigarettes per day
According to Turkish Statistical Institude during September 2011 the average Turkish net income was €790.
Analysis of covariance assessing the effects of physical activity using lipids as dependent variables, physically activation group as fixed factors, and age as a covariate (MANCOVA). TC/HDL-C between groups were determined by independent samples t-test.
| Physically inactive (n=91) | Physically active (n=399) | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.07(3.92–4.22) | 3.91(3.85–3.98) | 3.57 | 0.059 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.05(0.95–1.16) | 0.89(0.84–1.08) | 9.11 | 0.003 |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.10(1.05–1.15) | 1.22(1.19–1.24) | 16.13 | 0.000 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.44(2.32–2.57) | 2.24(2.18–2.30) | 7.92 | 0.005 |
| Total Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol | 4.20 (±1.32) | 3.27(±0.86) | 44.47 | 0.000 |
Values of lipids are means with 95% confidence intervals in parenthesis and the ratio data are mean ± SD.
Data on triglycerides log10 transformed before analysis and untransformed mean values were reported here.
p<0.05
Analysis of covariance assessing the effects of smoking using lipids as dependent variables, smoking as fixed factors, and age, BMI as covariates. (MANCOVA).
| Smoking (n=123) | Non-smoking (n=367) | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.91(3.79–4.03) | 3.95(3.88–4.02) | 0.29 | 0.591 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L)* | 0.96(0.86–1.06) | 0.90(0.86–0.96) | 0.53 | 0.466 |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.16(1.11–1.20) | 1.21(1.18–1.23) | 4.42 | 0.036 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.28(2.17–2.38) | 2.28(2.22–2.34) | 0.00 | 0.982 |
p<0.05