| Literature DB >> 29755714 |
Hyun Goo Kang1, Seogki Lee2, Han Uk Ryu3, Youngsuk Shin4.
Abstract
Cerebral artery stenosis is currently diagnosed by transcranial Doppler (TCD), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). CTA exposes a patient to radiation, while CTA and MRA are invasive and side effects were related to contrast medium use. This study aims to provide a technique that can simply discriminate between people with normal blood vessels and those with cerebral artery stenosis using photoplethysmography (PPG), which is noninvasive and inexpensive. Moreover, the measurement takes only 120 seconds and is conducted on the fingers. The technique projects the light of a specific wavelength and analyzes the pulse waves which are generated when the blood passes through the blood vessels according to one's heartbeat using the transmitted light. Normalization was performed after dividing the extracted pulse waveform into windows, and maximum positive and negative amplitudes (MPA, MNA) were extracted from the detected pulse waves as features. The extracted features were used to identify normal subjects and those with cerebral artery stenosis using a linear discriminant analysis. The study results showed that the recognition rate using MPA was 92.2%, MNA was 90.6%, and combined MPA + MNA was 90.6%. The technique proposed is expected to detect early stage asymptomatic cerebral artery stenosis and help prevent ischemic stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29755714 PMCID: PMC5884199 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3253519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Flow diagram of the proposed screening method.
Figure 2(a) Measurement device. (b) Screenshot of the photoplethysmography (PPG) measurement software.
Figure 3(a) Original PPG signal acquired from the measurement device. (b) Resampled PPG signal. (c) Optimized PPG signal.
Figure 4Pulse wave signals extracted from a normal subject and from a subject with cerebral artery stenosis after optimization sampling: (a) normal subject and (b) cerebral artery stenosis subject.
Figure 5Classification results of normal subjects and those with cerebral artery stenosis using a linear discriminant analysis algorithm after applying the maximum positive amplitude (MPA) and maximum negative amplitude (MNA): (a) MPA features and (b) MNA features.
Experimental results based on the linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
| Feature type | Experiment | Recognition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum positive amplitude | Left + right index finger | 92.2 |
| Left index finger | 78.1 | |
| Right index finger | 81.1 | |
|
| ||
| Maximum negative amplitude | Left + right index finger | 90.6 |
| Left index finger | 76.6 | |
| Right index finger | 79.7 | |
Sensitivity and specificity for the proposed technique in the best recognition rate.
| Feature type | Performance parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (true positive) | Specificity (true negative) | ||
| Proposed technique | MPA | 90.6% | 93.8% |
| MNA | 80% | 100% | |
MPA: maximum positive amplitude; MNA: maximum negative amplitude.
Figure 6Anatomy of the common aortic arch branching patterns of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries [26].