Literature DB >> 2975567

A randomized trial of the efficacy and acceptability of a pen injector.

D P Murray1, P Keenan, E Gayer, P Salmon, G H Tomkin, M I Drury, D J O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

A controlled trial of pen injection of insulin was performed in 78 patients, with assessment of metabolic control and lifestyle. After a 6-week run-in period, during which control was optimized, the patients were randomized, either to stay on a twice daily insulin regimen (n = 37), or to change to a three times daily pen regimen with human ultralente at night (n = 41). Over the 20 weeks, there was no significant change in mean glycosylated haemoglobin (syringe, mean +/- SD, 11.1 +/- 2.5% to 10.9 +/- 2.0%; pen, 11.3 +/- 2.6% to 11.2 +/- 2.0%), in blood glucose profiles or in frequency of hypoglycaemic attacks in either group. A self-completed questionnaire demonstrated high patient satisfaction with the pen injector (NovoPen), 78% for effect on lifestyle and 81% for increased flexibility. Ninety-five percent preferred the pen injector regimen to conventional treatment and stayed on it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2975567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb01102.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  10 in total

1.  Insulin pens. Is delivery sacrificed to improve patient compliance?

Authors:  D Gordon
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Recent developments in insulin delivery techniques. Current status and future potential.

Authors:  F P Kennedy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and usability test among adults with diabetes and impaired manual dexterity.

Authors:  Birtha Hansen; Søren K Lilleøre; Gitte Ter-Borch
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?

Authors:  Barbara J Anderson; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 5.  A review of 20 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin injection devices.

Authors:  Jørn Rex; Klaus H Jensen; Simon A Lawton
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Adverse effects of exogenous insulin. Clinical features, management and prevention.

Authors:  A W Patrick; G Williams
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Long term efficacy of a pen injector.

Authors:  S F Dinneen; C C Cronin; D J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  A review of 25 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin pens in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jacob Hyllested-Winge; Klaus H Jensen; Jørn Rex
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 9.  The Review of Insulin Pens-Past, Present, and Look to the Future.

Authors:  Małgorzata Masierek; Katarzyna Nabrdalik; Oliwia Janota; Hanna Kwiendacz; Maksymilian Macherski; Janusz Gumprecht
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Development of an Insulin Pen is a Patient-Centric Multidisciplinary Undertaking: A Commentary.

Authors:  Thomas Sparre; Niels-Aage B Hansen; Anya Sonia Wernersson; Mark Guarraia
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.