| Literature DB >> 29755582 |
Fouzia Tabssum1, Muhammad Irfan2, Hafiz Abdullah Shakir1, Javed Iqbal Qazi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cellulases are enzyme which have potential applications in various industries. Researchers are looking for potential cellulolytic bacterial strains for industrial exploitation. In this investigation, cellulase production of Bacillus cereus was explored while attacking poplar twigs. The bacterium was isolated from the gut of freshwater fish, Labeo rohita and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology. Various nutritional conditions were screened and optimized through response surface methodology. Initially, Plackett-Burman design was used for screening purpose and optimization was conducted through Box-Bhenken design.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus sp. 16S rRNA; Cellulase; Labeo rohita; RSM
Year: 2018 PMID: 29755582 PMCID: PMC5934882 DOI: 10.1186/s13036-018-0097-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Eng ISSN: 1754-1611 Impact factor: 4.355
Fig. 1Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus cereus isolated from gut of Labeo rhoita
Range of parameters used for Placket Burrman design
| Parameter | Label | Codes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| +1 | -1 | ||
| Substrate Conc. (%) |
| 0.5 | 5 |
| FeSO4.7H2O (%) |
| 0.07 | 0.13 |
| KH2PO4 (%) |
| 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Yeast extract (%) |
| 0.15 | 0.5 |
| MgSO4 (%) |
| 0.06 | 0.12 |
| CaCl2 (%) |
| 0.025 | 0.125 |
| Peptone (%) |
| 0.03 | 0.05 |
| CoCl2 (%) | X8 | 0.05 | 0.1 |
Placket-Burman design for screening of parameters for exoglucanase production in submerged fermentation
| Run No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | Exoglucanase activity (IU) | Residues | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||||||||
| 1 | 5.0 | 0.13 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.125 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.077 | 0.069 | 0.007 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 0.110 | -0.020 |
| 3 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.125 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.493 | 0.462 | 0.030 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.295 | 0.321 | -0.026 |
| 5 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.025 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.299 | 0.329 | -0.030 |
| 6 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.694 | 0.712 | -0.018 |
| 7 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.025 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.161 | 0.122 | 0.038 |
| 8 | 5.0 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.025 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.516 | 0.503 | 0.012 |
| 9 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.584 | 0.557 | 0.026 |
| 10 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.025 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.297 | 0.317 | -0.020 |
| 11 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.025 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.395 | 0.395 | 0.000 |
| 12 | 5.0 | 0.13 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.125 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.077 | 0.069 | 0.007 |
Fig. 2Pareto chart or significant variables for exoglucanase production from Bacillus sp
Box-Bhenken design for exoglucanase production
| Run No. | X4 | X5 | X7 | Exoglucanase activity | Endoglucanase activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| observed | predicted | residual | observed | predicted | residual | ||||
| 1 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 1.60 | 1.60 | -0.00 | 1.80 | 1.83 | -0.03 |
| 2 | 0.325 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.860 | 0.872 | -0.012 | 0.950 | 0.983 | -0.033 |
| 3 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.080 | 0.076 | 0.004 | 0.060 | 0.059 | 0.001 |
| 4 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.430 | 0.421 | 0.008 | 0.390 | 0.357 | 0.032 |
| 5 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.048 | 0.052 | -0.004 | 0.015 | 0.043 | -0.028 |
| 6 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.260 | 1.264 | -0.004 | 1.340 | 1.340 | -0.000 |
| 7 | 0.325 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 1.360 | 1.347 | 0.012 | 1.840 | 1.807 | 0.033 |
| 8 | 0.325 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 1.660 | 1.656 | 0.003 | 1.640 | 1.646 | -0.006 |
| 9 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 2.200 | 2.191 | 0.008 | 2.159 | 2.154 | 0.004 |
| 10 | 0.325 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 1.660 | 1.656 | 0.003 | 1.650 | 1.646 | 0.003 |
| 11 | 0.325 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 1.770 | 1.769 | 0.0002 | 2.150 | 2.121 | 0.028 |
| 12 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.470 | 1.478 | -0.008 | 1.500 | 1.504 | -0.004 |
| 13 | 0.325 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 1.650 | 1.656 | -0.006 | 1.650 | 1.646 | 0.003 |
| 14 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.770 | 0.765 | 0.0042 | 0.530 | 0.501 | 0.028 |
| 15 | 0.325 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1.770 | 1.770 | -0.000 | 1.900 | 1.928 | -0.028 |
Fig. 3Effect of initial medium pH, temperature and inoculum size on cellulase production by B.cereus in submerged fermentation
Fig. 4Contour plots of cellulase production from Bacillus cereus in submerged fermentation
Analysis of variance of cellulase production
| Exoglucanase | Sources | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F value | |
| Model | 9 | 5.98870 | 0.66541 | 4391.18 | 0.000 | |
| X4 | 1 | 1.80690 | 1.80690 | 11924.11 | 0.000 | |
| X5 | 1 | 0.11234 | 0.11234 | 741.34 | 0.000 | |
| X7 | 1 | 0.11281 | 0.11281 | 744.47 | 0.000 | |
| X42 | 1 | 1.18320 | 1.18320 | 7808.19 | 0.000 | |
| X52 | 1 | 0.52920 | 0.52920 | 3492.31 | 0.000 | |
| X72 | 1 | 0.09680 | 0.09680 | 638.81 | 0.000 | |
| X4X5 | 1 | 0.36724 | 0.36724 | 2423.47 | 0.000 | |
| X4X7 | 1 | 1.35723 | 1.35723 | 8956.61 | 0.000 | |
| X5X7 | 1 | 0.43560 | 0.43560 | 2874.62 | 0.000 | |
| Error | 5 | 0.00076 | 0.00015 | |||
| Lack of fit | 3 | 0.00069 | 0.00023 | 6.91 | 0.129 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 0.00007 | 0.00003 | |||
| Total | 14 | 5.98945 | ||||
| Endoglucanase | Sources | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F value | |
| Model | 9 | 7.48850 | 0.83206 | 544.58 | 0.000 | |
| X4 | 1 | 1.86631 | 1.86631 | 1221.50 | 0.000 | |
| X5 | 1 | 0.51765 | 0.51765 | 338.80 | 0.000 | |
| X7 | 1 | 0.19877 | 0.19877 | 130.09 | 0.000 | |
| X42 | 1 | 1.83040 | 1.83040 | 1198.0 | 0.000 | |
| X52 | 1 | 0.24737 | 0.24737 | 161.90 | 0.000 | |
| X72 | 1 | 0.38323 | 0.38323 | 250.82 | 0.000 | |
| X4X5 | 1 | 0.67651 | 0.67651 | 442.77 | 0.000 | |
| X4X7 | 1 | 1.27577 | 1.27577 | 834.99 | 0.000 | |
| X5X7 | 1 | 0.39690 | 0.39690 | 259.77 | 0.000 | |
| Error | 5 | 0.00764 | 0.00153 | |||
| Lack of fit | 3 | 0.00757 | 0.00252 | 75.73 | 0.013 | |
| Pure error | 2 | 0.00007 | 0.00003 | |||
| Total | 14 | 7.49614 |
Fig. 5Graph between observed and predicted values
Fig. 6Desirability charts for exoglucanase and endoglucanase production
Fig. 7Total sugars produced from hydrolysis of poplar biomass using (a) Indigenous enzyme (b) Commercial enzyme
Fig. 8Percent saccharification from poplar biomass using (a) Indigenous enzyme (b) Commercial enzyme.