| Literature DB >> 29755562 |
Mahban Rahimifard1,2, Azadeh Manayi3,2, Maryam Baeeri1, Mahdi Gholami4, Soodabeh Saeidnia3, Mohammad Abdollahi1,4.
Abstract
The genus Achillea (Asteraceae) consisting of important medicinal species, growing wildly in Iran, of which A. tenuifolia is found in Iran-o-Turan regions. Regarding the traditional use of Achillea species for treatment of diabetes and also lack of information on phyto-constituents of A. tenuifolia underground parts, in this study anti-diabetic activity of the plant have been reported. In order to find the main active components, underground parts of the plant were extracted with water and fractioned by hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol and the separation of the main compounds were carried out via medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC). Also, anti-diabetic effects of the extract were investigated on rat pancreatic islets. The root extract of the plant as well as the compound β-sitosterol showed moderate α-amylase inhibitory activity, however prangol did not suppress the enzyme activity. The results of islet cells' bio-function assays revealed that the herb root extract was able to increase the secretion of insulin in high concentration (10 mg/mL) and improved the cell viability with no toxicity in all doses. Furthermore, the herbal extract could reduce the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation (LPO). The plant extract also significantly decreased the enzyme activity for both caspase-3 and -9 and increased the antioxidant capacity of the isolated cells. Taking together, preparations or extracts from the underground parts of the plant are good candidates for further anti-diabetic investigation and clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: Achillea tenuifolia root; Oxidative stress; Pancreatic islet cells; Prangol; β-Sitosterol
Year: 2018 PMID: 29755562 PMCID: PMC5937101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
1H (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C- NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) of the compound 1 (prangol).
|
|
13
|
1
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 161.3 | - |
|
| 112.8 | 6.22 (d, |
|
| 139.2 | 8.14 (d, |
|
| 148.5 | - |
|
| 114.1 | - |
|
| 158.0 | - |
|
| 94.6 | 7.08 (s, 1H) |
|
| 107.1 | - |
|
| 152.4 | - |
|
| - | - |
|
| 145.2 | 7.58 (d, |
|
| 104.8 | 6.97 (d, |
|
| - | - |
|
| - | - |
|
| 71.7 | 4.43 (dd, |
|
| 74.4 | 3.90 (dd, |
|
| 76.5 | - |
|
| 26.6 | 1.35 (s, 3H) |
|
| 25.1 | 1.30 (s, 3H) |
Percent of α-Amylase inhibitory activities (% AAI) and IC50 values of the extract and active constituents of A. tenuifolia
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10 | 50.2 ± 1.0 | 10.4 ± 1.6 |
| 15 | 34.1 ± 1.3 | ||
| 20 | 10.8 ± 1.8 | ||
| 25 | 6.8 ± 1.9 | ||
|
| 10 | 67.3 ± 2.1 | 6.6 ± 2.1 |
| 15 | 69.2 ± 3.9 | ||
| 20 | 73.8 ± 1.9 | ||
| 25 | 82.1 ± 2.3 | ||
|
| 10 | 25.5 ± 0.02 | 18.9 ± 2.1 |
| 15 | 28.7 ± 0.03 | ||
| 20 | 57.4 ± 0.02 | ||
| 25 | 59.4 ± 0.03 | ||
|
| 10 | 6.0 ± 0.02 | > 200 |
| 15 | 6.3 ± 0.02 | ||
| 20 | 7.2 ± 0.01 | ||
| 25 | 7.4 ± 0.03 |
Conc: Concentration, % AAI: percent of α-Amylase inhibitory activities);
IC50 value is the concentration of sample required for 50% inhibition. Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3);
The IC50 value more than 200 shows almost no activity.
Figure 1Chemical structures of the isolated compounds from A. tenuifolia.
Figure 2The results of MTT assay on different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. Each group contained 10 rats’ pancreatic islets; * and *** mean significant increase of mitochondrial activity compared to the control group by p value < 0.05 and p value < 0.001; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract
Figure 3The results of insulin secretion from different groups of rats’ pancreatic islets treated with different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. Each group contained two different sub-groups of 10 rats’ pancreatic islets that stimulated with 2.8 and 16.7 mM of glucose; * and *** mean significant increase of secretion compared to the control group by p value < 0.05 and p value < 0.001; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract
Figure 4.The results of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement for groups of rats’ pancreatic islets treated with different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. * and *** mean significant decrease of ROS generation percentage compared to the control group by p value < 0.05 and p value < 0.001; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract
Figure 5The results of caspase-3 and -9 activity percentages for groups of rats’ pancreatic islets treated with different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. *, ** and *** mean significant decrease of caspase activity percentage compared to the control group by p value < 0.05, p value < 0.01 and p value < 0.001, respectively; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract
Figure 6The results of cellular lipid peroxidation (LPO) measurement for groups of rats’ pancreatic islets treated with different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. * and *** mean significant changing of LPO percentage compared to the control group by p value < 0.05 and p value < 0.001; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract
Figure 7The results of FRAP assay for groups of rats’ pancreatic islets treated with different concentrations of the root extract of A. tenuifolia. * and *** mean significant increase of antioxidant capacity of cells compared to the control group by p value < 0.05 and p value < 0.001; Control group contains islets that were not treated by extract