Literature DB >> 29755489

Optimizing Production in the New Generation of Apricot Cultivars: Self-incompatibility, S-RNase Allele Identification, and Incompatibility Group Assignment.

Sara Herrera1, Jorge Lora2, José I Hormaza2, Maria Herrero3, Javier Rodrigo1.   

Abstract

Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) is a species of the Rosaceae that was originated in Central Asia, from where it entered Europe through Armenia. The release of an increasing number of new cultivars from different breeding programs is resulting in an important renewal of plant material worldwide. Although most traditional apricot cultivars in Europe are self-compatible, the use of self-incompatible cultivars as parental genotypes for breeding purposes is leading to the introduction of a number of new cultivars that behave as self-incompatible. As a consequence, there is an increasing need to interplant those new cultivars with cross-compatible cultivars to ensure fruit set in commercial orchards. However, the pollination requirements of many of these new cultivars are unknown. In this work, we analyze the pollination requirements of a group of 92 apricot cultivars, including traditional and newly-released cultivars from different breeding programs and countries. Self-compatibility was established by the observation of pollen tube behavior in self-pollinated flowers under the microscope. Incompatibility relationships between cultivars were established by the identification of S-alleles by PCR analysis. The self-(in)compatibility of 68 cultivars and the S-RNase genotype of 74 cultivars are reported herein for the first time. Approximately half of the cultivars (47) behaved as self-compatible and the other 45 as self-incompatible. Identification of S-alleles in self-incompatible cultivars allowed allocating them in 11 incompatibility groups, six of them reported here for the first time. The determination of pollination requirements and the incompatibility relationships between cultivars is highly valuable for the appropriate selection of apricot cultivars in commercial orchards and of parental genotypes in breeding programs. The approach described can be transferred to other woody perennial crops with similar problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prunus armeniaca; S-alleles; S-genotype; ovary; pollen tube; pollination; self-incompatibility; style

Year:  2018        PMID: 29755489      PMCID: PMC5935046          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) is considered as one of the most delicious temperate fruits (Faust et al., 1998). Apricot is a species of the Rosaceae, one of the most economically important plant families in temperate regions worldwide (Dirlewanger et al., 2004). Although the Latin name of apricot (armeniaca) and later its scientific name (P. armeniaca) could wrongly suggest an origin from Armenia, apricot was indeed originated in Central Asia, where the first orchards of apricot were described 406-250 BC (Janick, 2005), whereas Armenia was the route by which apricot first entered Europe. Apricot was already mentioned as Mela armeniaca by Roman authors around 50 A.D., which could indicate its introduction in the Roman empire during the first century (Faust et al., 1998). The English name apricot (apricock in the old spelling) derives from the Arabic and Greek term al-praecox that means “early fruit” (Faust et al., 1998; Janick, 2005). Traditionally, apricot cultivars have been classified in six main groups depending on the geographical origin: Dzhungar-Zailij, East Chinese, European Iranian-Caucasian, Middle-Asian, and North Chinese (Layne et al., 1996). Apricot cultivars from the Central Asian, the Dzhungar-Zailij, and the Iranian-Caucasian groups are mostly self-incompatible. However, cultivars from the European group, which is the least variable and the most recent, are mainly self-compatible and include most of the commercial cultivars (Mehlenbacher et al., 1991; Hormaza et al., 2007). In the Rosaceae, the incompatibility mechanism to reduce self-fertilization and promote outcrossing is based on cell-cell recognition that is determined genetically by a gametophytic self-incompatibility System (GSI). This mechanism acts through the inhibition of pollen tube growth in the style (de Nettancourt, 2001) and is controlled by a multiallelic locus named S, encoding two linked genes that determine the pistil and pollen genotypes (Charlesworth et al., 2005). A ribonuclease (S-RNase), which is a glycoprotein secreted in the style mucilage, determines the allele specificity of the style (Tao et al., 1997) whereas an F-box protein (SFB) specifically expressed in pollen determines pollen allele specificity (Ushijima et al., 2003). The introduction of an increasing number of new apricot cultivars from different breeding programs is resulting in an important renewal of plant material worldwide (Zhebentyayeva et al., 2012). Thus, the initial classification of six ecogeographical groups is becoming increasingly complex, since many of the new cultivars are derived from crosses between genotypes of different ecogeographical groups (Faust et al., 1998; Halász et al., 2007). Moreover, although most traditional apricot cultivars in Europe are self-compatible (Burgos et al., 1997), the use of self-incompatible cultivars developed in North America as parental genotypes in several breeding programs, with the objective of incorporating resistance to sharka (Hormaza et al., 2007; Zhebentyayeva et al., 2012), is leading to the introduction of new self-incompatible cultivars. As a consequence, there is an increasing need to interplant those new cultivars with cross-compatible cultivars to ensure fruit set in commercial orchards. However, the pollination requirements of many of these new cultivars are unknown. The pollination requirements of a cultivar can be established by carrying out controlled pollinations in the field and recording the percentage of fruit set. Final fruit set in apricot is usually established during the first 4 weeks following pollination (Rodrigo et al., 2009; Julian et al., 2010). However, incompatibility can be determined more accurately under a fluorescence microscope by the observation of pollen tube growth through the style in self- and cross-pollinated flowers in squash preparations of pistils after staining with aniline blue (Burgos et al., 1993; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996, 2002; Julian et al., 2010). In self-incompatible genotypes and incompatible crosses, pollen tube growth is arrested in the style and, therefore, fertilization of the ovules is prevented since no pollen tubes reach the ovary. However, in self-compatible genotypes and compatible crosses, pollen tubes can grow along the style and reach the ovary, where fertilization of some of the two ovules can take place. This histochemical approach allows the identification of pollination failure from diverse environmental factors that can affect fruit set under field conditions (Guerra and Rodrigo, 2015). In addition, advances in the study of the molecular determinants of self-incompatibility have allowed developing tools to analyze the allelic composition of the self-incompatibility locus. Thus, the identification of the S-RNase gene in apricot (Romero et al., 2004; Sutherland et al., 2004) allowed developing an S-allele genotyping PCR strategy, similar to those developed for cherry or almond (Sutherland et al., 2004). To date, 33 S-alleles (S to S S to S, S, S, S, and S), including one allele for self-compatibility (S), have been identified in apricot (Halász et al., 2005; Vilanova et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2008; Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017; Murathan et al., 2017), although additional alleles have been included in the NCBI database and not yet published. These studies allowed the determination of different apricot S-genotypes from different countries (Halász et al., 2010; Kodad et al., 2013a,b; Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017) that are included in, up to now, 17 incompatibility groups (Szabó and Nyéki, 1991; Egea and Burgos, 1996; Halász et al., 2010; Lachkar et al., 2013). Due to the increasing release of a high number of apricot cultivars in the last years with unknown self-incompatibility genotypes, in this work we analyze the pollination requirements of a group of 92 apricot cultivars, including traditional and new cultivars released from different breeding programs. Self-compatibility was established by the observation of pollen tube behavior under the microscope following self-pollination. Incompatibility relationships between cultivars were established by the identification of S-alleles by PCR analysis. The results obtained allowed assigning each cultivar to its corresponding incompatibility group.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Leaf and flower samples from 92 apricot cultivars, including traditional cultivars from different origins and new cultivars from different breeding programs (Table 1), were collected from diverse collections for pollination experiments and S-RNase genotyping.
Table 1

Country of origin, number of pistils examined, percentage of pistils with pollen tubes halfway the style, at the base of the style, and reaching the ovule, percentage of style traveled by the longest pollen tube, mean number of pollen tubes at the base of the style, and self-incompatibility (SI) or self-compatibility (SC) of 92 apricot cultivars analyzed in this work.

CultivarCountry of originNumber of pistils examinedPistils (%) with pollen tubesPercentage of style traveled by the longest pollen tubeMean number of pollen tubes at the base of the styleSI/SC
Halfway the styleAt the base of the styleReaching the ovule
AC1USA1310000820SI
ASF0401France179400650SI
ASF0402France2410000650SI
Avirine (Bergarouge)France1310000620SI
CA-26 (Almater)Spain2010055700SI
ColoradoSpain309000640SI
Cooper CotUSA1010000650SI
Durobar (Almadulce)Spain2310000670SI
FarelyFrance1010000630SI
Feria CotFrance1010000780SI
Flash CotUSA107000540SI
FlodeaSpain1110000710SI
GoldbarUSA2010000620SI
GoldrichUSA729433690SI
Goldstrike 01aUSA4010000710SI
Goldstrike 02aUSA2010000720SI
HarcotCanada449500620SI
HargrandCanada491001414770SI
HendersonUSA4791159750SI
Holly CotFrance2010000610SI
JNPSpain2010055750SI
Lilly CotUSA479620670SI
Magic CotUSA3010000650SI
Maya CotFrance1010000660SI
MedagaFrance1010000710SI
MegateaSpain1010000620SI
MoniquiSpain1810060790SI
Monster CotUSA1010000700SI
MuñozSpain2110000720SI
OrangeredUSA109000640SI
PandoraGreece2310040750SI
Peñaflor 01aSpain2910077710SI
Perle CotUSA289340720SI
PinkcotFrance349790830SI
PriabelFrance1090100810SI
RobadaUSA259600630SI
Spring BlushFrance408333550SI
Stark Early OrangeUSA51983316870SI
StellaUSA131002315850SI
Sun GloUSA6410020710SI
Sunny CotUSA1010000650SI
Sweet CotUSA209500660SI
Vanilla CotUSA2010000790SI
VeecotCanada2910033740SI
Wonder CotUSA3710000690SI
AC2USA101001001001002.2SC
Aprix 20Spain1510073531001.4SC
Aprix 33Spain101001001001001.1SC
Aprix 9Spain1410086641002.1SC
ASF0404 (Apriqueen)France2210091911003SC
BerdejoSpain101001001001001.9SC
BergecotFrance2010095951002.5SC
CaninoSpain29100100831002.0SC
CharismaSouth Africa231001001001003SC
CorbatoSpain6010098931003.2SC
Delice CotFrance1510087531001.1SC
FaraliaFrance111001001001002SC
FarbalyFrance2210086771002.0SC
FarbelaFrance61001001001001.8SC
FarcloFrance9100100891001.4SC
FardaoFrance91001001001004.1SC
FarfiaFrance101001001001003SC
FarhialFrance101001001001003SC
FariusFrance121001001001002SC
FarlisFrance221001001001002SC
FartoliFrance101001001001003SC
FlopriaSpain101001001001002SC
Golden SweetUSA2110095951002SC
Lady CotFrance2610077771002.3SC
LornaUSA171001001001003SC
LuizetFrance1010090801001SC
MedfloFrance81001001001001.9SC
MediabelFrance121001001001001.2SC
MedivaFrance910089891002.3SC
Mirlo AnaranjadoSpain101001001001002.1SC
Mirlo BlancoSpain101001001001002SC
MitgerSpain501001001001002.4SC
PalsteynSouth Africa301001001001003SC
PaviotFrance1210091911001.2SC
Peñaflor 02aSpain610083.366.61001.4SC
Pepito del RubioSpain12100100901002.2SC
Playa CotFrance10100100701001.7SC
PriciaFrance91001001001002SC
PrimidiFrance98978781002SC
Rouge CotFrance1010090701001.55SC
RubistaFrance199589891001.7SC
Sandy CotFrance101001001001002.3SC
SoledaneFrance211001001001003SC
SwiredSwitzerland9100100901001.8SC
TadeoSpain3610097971002.4SC
Tom CotUSA101001001001003SC
Victor 11410093931002.1SC

Diverse origin.

Country of origin, number of pistils examined, percentage of pistils with pollen tubes halfway the style, at the base of the style, and reaching the ovule, percentage of style traveled by the longest pollen tube, mean number of pollen tubes at the base of the style, and self-incompatibility (SI) or self-compatibility (SC) of 92 apricot cultivars analyzed in this work. Diverse origin.

Pollination experiments

To explore self-(in)compatibility, self-pollinations of the 92 apricot cultivars were carried out in the laboratory. Pollen tube growth was observed in self-pollinated flowers under the microscope (Table 1). As control, a group of flowers of each cultivar were cross-pollinated with pollen from “Canino” or “Katy,” which are considered as universal pollinizers for apricot (Zuriaga et al., 2013). Pollen was extracted from flowers collected at the balloon stage. For this purpose, the anthers were removed and dried at laboratory temperature during 24 h. After that, pollen grains were sieved by using a fine mesh (0.26 mm) and used immediately or frozen at −20°C until further use. Pistils were obtained from flowers collected 1 day before anthesis, at balloon stage. After the removing of petals, sepals and stamens, the pistils were maintained on wet florist foam at laboratory temperature (Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996). For each self- and cross-pollination, a group of 20–25 flowers were hand pollinated with the help of a paintbrush 24 h after emasculation. After 72 h, they were fixed in ethanol (95%)/acetic acid (3:1, v/v) during 24 h, and conserved at 4°C in 75% ethanol (Williams et al., 1999). When observations of pollen tube growth were not clear, each cross was repeated every year during the flowering period up to 4 years. In order to evaluate pollen viability, after hand pollination, pollen from each cultivar was scattered on a solidified pollen germination medium (Hormaza et al., 1996). After 24 h, preparations were observed under the microscope. Pollen grains were considered viable when the length of the growing pollen tubes was higher than the pollen grain diameter. For histochemical preparations, the pistils were washed three times for 1 h with distilled water and left in 5% sodium sulphite at 4°C for 24 h. Then, to soften the tissues, they were autoclaved at 1 kg/cm2 during 10 min in sodium sulphite (Jefferies and Belcher, 1974). To stain callose, the softened pistils, were stained with 0.1% (v/v) aniline blue in 0.1 N K3PO4 (Linskens and Esser, 1957). The observation of pollen tube behavior along the style was performed by a Leica DM2500 microscope (Cambridge, UK) with UV epifluorescence using 340–380 bandpass and 425 longpass filters. The percentage of style traveled by the longest pollen tube and the mean number of pollen tubes at the base of the style were recorded on at least 10 pistils in each cross. Cultivars were considered as self-incompatible when pollen tube growth was arrested in the style in most pistils from self-pollinated flowers, and as self-compatible when more than half of the pistils displayed at least one pollen tube reaching the base of the style.

DNA extraction

For the identification of S-alleles, young leaves were collected in spring. Genomic DNA from 92 cultivars (Table 2) was isolated following the protocol described by Hormaza (2002) and using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). NanoDrop™ ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Bio-Science, Budapest, Hungary) was used to measure DNA concentrations to analyze the quantity and quality of DNA.
Table 2

Incompatibility group (I.G.) and S-RNase genotype of 92 apricot cultivars analyzed in this study and 30 additional cultivars analyzed in previous studies.

I.G.S-RNase genotypeCultivars analyzed in this studyCultivars analyzed in previous studiesReferences
IS1S2AC1x
Hargrand2, 5, 14
Katy13, 14
Goldrich1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 13, 14
Castleton14
Farmingdale9
Giovanniello9
Lambertin-12, 14
IIS8S9Pinkcotx
Perle Cotx
Ceglédi óriás5, 8
Cologlu12
Kadioglu12
Ligeti óriás5, 8
Seftalioglu12
Szegedi M.14
IIIS2S6ASF0401x
Avirine (Bergarouge)x
Moniqui2, 6, 14
Iri Bitirgen12
VS2S8Holly Cotx
Sweet Cotx
Alyanak12
Ziraat Okulu12
VIIIS6S9Orangeredw14
ASF0402x
Wonder Cotx
Stark Early Orangew14
Feria Cotx
Sunny Cotx
JNPx
Cataloglu12
Ozal12
Soganci12
XVIIIzS1S3Cooper Cotx
Perfection1
XIXzS2S3Mayacotx
Sun Glo2, 3, 4, 6
XXzS2S9Magic Cotx
Goldstrike 02v,x
Hasanbey12
XXIzS3S8Spring Blushx
Lilly Cotx
Kayseri P.A12
XXIIzS3S9Durobar (Almadulce)x
Hendersonw14
Flodeax
Akcadag Günay12
XXIIIzS7S9Goldbarx
Kurukabuk12
S2Pandorax
Veecot
Muñozx
Peñaflor 01v, x
Hardgrand
Goldrich
Búlida9
Lornay9
Perla9
S3Coloradoy
Ninfa9
S4Harcot
S6Stella
S8Vanilla Cotx
Robadax
Katy7
Krimskyi Medunec5
S9Flash Cotx
Goldstrike 01v,x
CA-26 (Almater) x
Farelyx
Medagax
Megateax
Monster Cotx
Priabelx
Self-compatible cultivarsS2ScBerdejox
Canino3, 10, 13
Paviotx
Pepito del Rubio2, 3
Peñaflor 02v,x
Bergecotx
Medivax
Primidix
Sandy Cotx
S3ScPriciax
Rubistax
S6ScAprix 20x
Aprix 9x
Faraliax
Farlisx
Medflox
Mediabelx
S7ScCharismax
S9ScAC2x
Flopriax
Tom Cotx
ScSoledanex
ASF0404 (Apriqueen)x
Mirlo Blanco11
Mitger
Tadeo
Corbatoy
Aprix 33x
Delice Cotx
Farbalyx
Farbelax
Farclox
Fardaox
Farfiax
Farhialx
Fariusx
Fartolix
Lady Cotx
Mirlo Anaranjado
Luizetx
Playa Cotx
Swiredx
Rouge Cotx
S1S2Lornax,y
Palsteynx,y
S2S9Victor 1x
S3Golden Sweetx

(1) Egea and Burgos (.

Diverse origin.

S.

S-RNase genotypes first reported in this study.

Cultivars in which S-RNase genotype reported herein differs from that reported in other studies.

Incompatibility groups first reported in this study.

Incompatibility group (I.G.) and S-RNase genotype of 92 apricot cultivars analyzed in this study and 30 additional cultivars analyzed in previous studies. (1) Egea and Burgos (. Diverse origin. S. S-RNase genotypes first reported in this study. Cultivars in which S-RNase genotype reported herein differs from that reported in other studies. Incompatibility groups first reported in this study.

S-RNase allele identification by PCR analysis

Amplification reactions for the first intron region of the S-RNase gene were carried out with the combination of the fluorescently labeled forward primer SRc-F (5′-CTCGCTTTCCTTGTTCTTGC-3′) with the reverse primer SRc-R (5′-GGCCATTGTTGCACAAATTG-3′; Romero et al., 2004; Vilanova et al., 2005). PCR amplifications were carried out in 15 μl reaction volumes, containing 10x NH4 Reaction Buffer, 25 mM Cl2Mg, 2.5 mM of each dNTP, 10 μM of each primer, 100 ng of genomic DNA and 0.5 U of BioTaq™ DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK). The temperature profile used had an initial step of 3 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C and 3 min at 72°C, and a final step of 5 min at 72°C. The sizes of the products obtained by PCR were analyzed in a CEQ™ 8000 capillary electrophoresis DNA analysis system (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and compared and classified according to Vilanova et al. (2005) and Kodad et al. (2013b). Primers Pru-C2 (5′-CTTTGGCCAAGTAATTATTCAAACC-3′) and Pru-C4R (5′-GGATGTGGTACGATTGAAGCG-3′) were used for the amplification of the second intron region as recommended by Vilanova et al. (2005), but with the addition of 10 cycles and using 55°C of annealing temperature as indicated by Sonneveld et al. (2003). Amplified fragments of the second intron were separated on 1% (w/v) agarose gels and DNA bands were visualized using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green (Thermo).

Sequencing of genomic PCR products

Two PCR fragments of 420 and 430 bp obtained by the automatic sequencer were isolated using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey-Nagel). Cloning was performed using CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo) and by electroporation in E. coli Single-Use JM109 Competent Cells (Promega). The search for similarities in the sequences of the NCBI database was performed with BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, version 2.2.10). The 420 bp fragment resulted in a fragment of 414 bp after one sequencing reaction whereas the initial 430 bp fragment resulted in a fragment of 421 bp after two sequencing reactions.

Results

Self-compatibility of 92 apricot cultivars was established by the observation of pollen tube behavior in pistils under the microscope after self-pollinations (Table 1). Germinated pollen grains were observed in the stigma (Figure 1A) in all the pollinations performed. The establishment of self-incompatibility or self-compatibility could be carried out for all the cultivars. Approximately half of the cultivars (47) behaved as self-compatible, displaying most pistils with pollen tubes growing along the style (Figure 1B) and at least one pollen tube reaching the base of the style (Figure 1C). On the other hand, in 45 cultivars pollen tubes arrested their growth in the style (Figure 1D) and no pollen tubes reached the base of the style in most of the pistils. Consequently, these cultivars were considered as self-incompatible. As expected, in all cross-pollinations pistils displayed pollen tubes at the base of the style. Between one and four pollen tubes at the base of the style were observed in self-compatible cultivars.
Figure 1

Pollen tube growth in self-pollinated apricot flowers. (A) Pollen grains germinating at the stigma surface. (B) Pollen tubes growing along the style. (C) Pollen tubes reaching the base of the style. (D) Pollen tube arrested in the style. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Pollen tube growth in self-pollinated apricot flowers. (A) Pollen grains germinating at the stigma surface. (B) Pollen tubes growing along the style. (C) Pollen tubes reaching the base of the style. (D) Pollen tube arrested in the style. Scale bars, 100 μm.

S-RNase allele PCR analysis

To confirm the results obtained in the pollination experiments, PCR analyses using specific primers from conserved regions of the apricot S-RNase locus were used to identify the S-RNase alleles of 92 apricot cultivars (Table 2). The information reported herein has been compiled with the S-RNase genotype of 30 additional cultivars previously determined showing the compatibility relationships among all the cultivars whose S-RNase genotype is known (Table 2). Cultivars have been allocated according their S-RNase alleles in 11 incompatibility groups, six of them reported here for the first time. Some cultivars with previously reported S-genotypes were initially used to confirm the size of S-RNase alleles previously identified using the primer pairs SRc-F and SRc-R (Vilanova et al., 2005) that amplify the first intron of the apricot S-RNase and allowed identifying the S-RNase alleles of the rest of the cultivars analyzed (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Gene structure of the P. armeniaca RNase gene. Genomic sequence of the S allele showing the exons in green square, the primers used for the identification of S-alleles and the five conserved regions (C1, C2, C2, C3, RC4, and C5), and one hypervariable region (RHV) in blue square.

Gene structure of the P. armeniaca RNase gene. Genomic sequence of the S allele showing the exons in green square, the primers used for the identification of S-alleles and the five conserved regions (C1, C2, C2, C3, RC4, and C5), and one hypervariable region (RHV) in blue square. Two alleles, S and S, could not be distinguished with the primers SRc-F/SRc-R, since these alleles showed similar fragment sizes in the first intron (Table 3). Thus, the PruC2/PruC4R primer combination designed from P. avium S-RNase-cDNA sequences (Tao et al., 1999) was additionally used to amplify the second intron. The alleles S and S had also similar fragment sizes in the first intron, and, in this case, the self-compatibility or self-incompatibility observed in the pollination experiments was used to distinguish between both alleles in each cultivar. A fragment of 420 or 430 bp was detected in some of the cultivars. These band sizes are close to the S allele, which has been reported as 424 bp (Kodad et al., 2013b) or 423 bp (Halász et al., 2010). To elucidate if the 430 bp and 420 bp bands obtained by an automatic sequencer correspond to new or pre-existing alleles, both fragments were cloned and sequenced, resulting in fragments of 421 and 414 bp, respectively.
Table 3

S-alleles identified or/and sequenced in Prunus armeniaca.

AllelesGen bank accessionSequenceFragment 1st intronFragment 2nd intronReferences
ScEF491872/DQ386735Partial CDS, 1st intron355a,e2800cHalász et al., 2007
S1AY587561CDS, 1st and 2nd intron408a,e2260b,eRomero et al., 2004
S2AY587562CDS, 1st and 2nd intron334a,e990bRomero et al., 2004
S3274a,e~450b,eVilanova et al., 2005
S4AY587564CDS, 1st and 2nd intron249a,e247b,eRomero et al., 2004
S5375a1400bVilanova et al., 2005
S6/S52KF951503 (S52)CDS, 1st and 2nd intron421a,e1386b,eUnpublished
S7408a,e900b,eVilanova et al., 2005
S8AY884212Partial CDS, 2nd Intron355a,e691bFeng et al., 2006; Halász et al., 2007
S9AY864826Partial CDS414a,e749b,eFeng et al., 2006
S10AY846872Partial CDS, 2nd Intron583dFeng et al., 2006
S11DQ868316Partial CDS, 2nd Intron464dZhang et al., 2008
S12DQ870628Partial CDS, 2nd Intron360dZhang et al., 2008
S13DQ870629Partial CDS, 2nd Intron401dZhang et al., 2008
S14DQ870630Partial CDS, 2nd Intron492dZhang et al., 2008
S15DQ870631Partial CDS, 2nd Intron469dZhang et al., 2008
S16DQ870632Partial CDS, 2nd Intron481dZhang et al., 2008
S17DQ870633Partial CDS, 2nd Intron487dZhang et al., 2008
S18DQ870634Partial CDS, 2nd Intron1337dZhang et al., 2008
S19EF133689Partial CDS, 2nd Intron546dZhang et al., 2008
S20EF160078Partial CDS, 2nd Intron1934dZhang et al., 2008
S22HM053569Partial CDS, 2nd Intron550dUnpublished
S23EU037262Partial CDS, 2nd Intron505dWu et al., 2009
S24EU037263Partial CDS, 2nd Intron168dWu et al., 2009
S25EU037264Partial CDS, 2nd Intron583dWu et al., 2009
S26EU037265Partial CDS, 2nd Intron289dWu et al., 2009
S27EU836683Partial CDS, 2nd Intron230dWu et al., 2009
S28EU836684Partial CDS, 2nd Intron948dWu et al., 2009
S29EF185300Partial CDS, 2nd Intron285dWu et al., 2009
S30EF185301Partial CDS, 2nd Intron956dWu et al., 2009

Amplified using SRc-(F/R).

Amplified using Pru-C2 and Pru-C4R.

Amplified using Pru-C2 and Pru-C3R.

Amplified using other primers.

Our results.

S-alleles identified or/and sequenced in Prunus armeniaca. Amplified using SRc-(F/R). Amplified using Pru-C2 and Pru-C4R. Amplified using Pru-C2 and Pru-C3R. Amplified using other primers. Our results. The 421 bp fragment showed a 99% identity with the S present in the NCBI database. This allele was initially included in the NCBI database and unpublished but, recently, it has been reported in some Turkish apricot cultivars (Murathan et al., 2017). Since the S allele had not been previously sequenced, the S allele could indeed correspond to the S allele. The S allele could also be identified with the primers Pru-C2/Pru-C4, showing a PCR-fragment of around 1400 bp (1386 bp) that included the second intron; a 1386 bp fragment was also amplified in the S allele with the same primer combination strongly suggesting that S and S could be the same allele. Thus, in this work, the 421 bp fragment was assigned to the S allele. The sequence of the 414 bp fragment showed high sequence similarity to S-alleles from other Prunus species, but not to any S-allele of Prunus armeniaca present in NCBI databases. The second intron of this allele was amplified with the primers Pru-C2/Pru-C4, showing a PCR-fragment of around 700 bp. Its cloning, sequencing and alignment revealed a 99% identity with the S allele [AY853594 (Feng et al., 2006)] and, consequently, the 414 bp fragment was assigned to the S allele. The 45 self-incompatible cultivars were grouped in incompatibility groups according to their S genotypes following the numbering proposed by Halász et al. (2010) and Lachkar et al. (2013). While 26 of the cultivars analyzed were assigned to 11 different incompatibility groups, 19 cultivars were not assigned since only one S-RNase allele was detected (Table 2). S was the most frequent allele, appearing in 22 cultivars, followed by S (21), S (19), S (16), S (10), S (6), and S (4), while S was the least frequent allele found in only two cultivars.

Discussion

Self-pollination of the 92 apricot cultivars analyzed in this work and observation of pollen tubes under the microscope showed that 47 behaved as self-compatible and 45 as self-incompatible. The self-(in)compatibility of 68 cultivars is reported herein for the first time. The results in the remaining 23 cultivars have been compared with previous reports in which self-(in)compatibility was determined by the evaluation of the percentage of fruit set after self-pollinations in the field (Egea and Burgos, 1996; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996; Burgos et al., 1997; Egea et al., 2010; Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017) or by the observation of pollen tube growth in pistils after self- and cross-pollinations (Egea and Burgos, 1996; Rodrigo and Herrero, 1996; Egea et al., 2010; Milatovic et al., 2013a,b). Thus, results herein agree with previous reports for “Canino,” “Corbato,” “Luizet,” “Mirlo Blanco,” “Mirlo Anaranjado,” “Mitger,” “Palsteyn,” “Paviot,” “Pepito del Rubio,” “Tadeo,” and “Tom Cot” as self-compatible, and also for “Bergarouge,” “Goldrich,” “Goldstrike,” “Harcot,” “Hargrand,” “Moniqui,” “Orangered,” “Pinkcot,” “Robada,” “Stark Early Orange,” “Stella,” “Sun Glo,” and “Veecot” as self-incompatible. Approximately half of the cultivars analyzed (49%) were self-incompatible, a very high percentage compared to the situation some years ago when most European cultivars were self-compatible (Mehlenbacher et al., 1991), including the most traditional cultivars (Burgos et al., 1997). The other half (51%) were self-compatible. Due to this dramatic increase in the number of self-incompatible apricot cultivars, knowing their pollination requirements is necessary in order to choose compatible pollinizers in designing new commercial orchards as well as in selecting parental genotypes in apricot breeding programs. The first case of cross-incompatibility of apricot cultivars in the European group was reported in the early 1990s in the Spanish cultivar Moniqui (Egea et al., 1991). The first incompatibility group in apricot, which consisted of three North American cultivars, was established several years later based on microscopic observations (Egea and Burgos, 1996), and, later, a more extensive study with 123 apricot cultivars, reported self-incompatibility in 42 cultivars (Burgos et al., 1997). Afterward the S-RNase proteins of seven S-alleles (S–S) and one allele associated with self-compatibility (S) were identified; the proteins were separated by non-equilibrium pH gradient electrofocusing (NEpHGE) in a gel that was later stained for ribonuclease activity (Alburquerque et al., 2002). The identification of the gene involved in GSI allowed S-allele identification by PCR analysis (Romero et al., 2004). In this first study, three S-alleles were sequenced (S, S, and S) (Romero et al., 2004). In a later study, S-allele genotyping using the SRc-F and SRc-R primers, which have also been used in our study and amplify the first intron, identified four self-incompatibility alleles (S, S5, S6, and S) and one allele for self-compatibility (S) (Vilanova et al., 2005). Nine additional S-alleles (S–S) were identified by Halász et al. (2005) in 23 apricot accessions, mostly from Hungary. These last 13 alleles (S, S–S) were only identified by PCR analysis. From then on, several studies have identified additional S-alleles by sequencing [S and S (Feng et al., 2006); S–S (Zhang et al., 2008); S–S (Wu et al., 2009)], but some of them have only been included in the NCBI database and not yet published. Some unpublished alleles such as S (Murathan et al., 2017)/S (our results) and S (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017), have already been associated to several cultivars. Most of these studies have been performed in apricot cultivars from different origins like China, Turkey, Hungary, or Spain and, in some cases, the use of different primers or just the inaccuracy of band identification in a gel or even analyzed by an automatic fragment analyzing system can result in misidentification and the appearance of numerous homologies (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017). For example, differences in reported fragment size can be found in the S [334 bp herein; 327 bp in Vilanova et al. (2005); 332 bp in Kodad et al. (2013b)] or S [358 bp herein; 353 bp in Vilanova et al. (2005); 355 bp in Kodad et al. (2013b)] alleles in addition to the S allele mentioned above. Moreover, many of the S-alleles, such as S–S alleles, in which the first intron is still unknown, have only been partially sequenced. From the 92 cultivars analyzed herein, 74 have been reported for the first time. Two alleles could be identified in most cultivars. However, a single allele was identified in 19 self-incompatible cultivars that may be due to inefficient PCR amplification of the S-RNase allele, in which the PCR primers may have a preferential amplification of the detected allele or caused by mismatching of PCR primers. Alternatively, the similar size of two alleles that show overlapping PCR fragments could make their identification difficult. Thus, the identification of additional S-RNase alleles in these genotypes requires more work focused on characterizing the S-locus. In 22 self-compatible cultivars, the identification of a unique allele could also be due to homozygosis of the self-compatible allele (S). Higher S-allele frequencies in the cultivars analyzed correspond to alleles S, S, and S (19–22%). The allele S is associated with self-compatibility, and the alleles S and S are present in different cultivars resistant to sharka from USA (“Goldrich,” “Henderson,” “Orangered,” and “Sun Glo”) and Canada (“Hargrand” and “Veecot”), which have been used as parental genotypes in different breeding programs (Hormaza et al., 2007; Zhebentyayeva et al., 2012). On the other hand, the allele S is the least frequent and is present in only two cultivars: “Charisma” from South Africa, and “Goldbar” from USA. Results herein, while confirmed the S-RNase genotype of 16 cultivars reported in previous studies, showed differences in the S-RNase genotype of “Corbato,” “Colorado,” “Lorna,” and “Palsteyn” reported previously (Burgos et al., 1998; Alburquerque et al., 2002; Vilanova et al., 2005; Donoso et al., 2009; Raz et al., 2009; Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017). To clarify their S-genotype, it would be necessary to identify their S-alleles in additional samples of the same cultivars. In this sense, sequencing can reveal the differences between a band fragment of an initial size, such as in our case, in which the initial fragment of 420 and 430 bp resulted in a S-allele of 414 bp (S) and 421 bp (S) respectively, after sequencing. Moreover, the sequence of the S (fragment of 421 bp) could reveal its similarity to S that has been recently assigned to Turkish apricot cultivars (Murathan et al., 2017). The self-incompatibility identification has allowed allocating the cultivars to their corresponding incompatibility groups. This information, compiled with those reported in previous studies, has allowed describing six new incompatibility groups (XVIII–XXIII). Thus, self-incompatible cultivars within the same incompatibility group have the same S-genotype and are genetically incompatible with each other. On the other hand, cultivars with at least one different S-allele are placed in different incompatibility groups and are inter-compatible. Although self-incompatibility was observed in nearly half of the cultivars analyzed herein, self-compatibility was still found in a good number of apricot cultivars. Self-compatibility has been related to particular S-alleles in different self-incompatible Prunus species, as almond (Fernández i Martí et al., 2014; Company et al., 2015), Japanese apricot (Ushijima et al., 2003), peach (Tao et al., 2006; Hanada et al., 2014), sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) (Yamane et al., 2003), and sweet cherry (Wunsch and Hormaza, 2004; Marchese et al., 2007; Cachi and Wünsch, 2014). The breakdown of the incompatibility system has been reported in these Prunus species affecting the function of S-locus in the stylar S-determinant (S-RNase) and in the pollen S-determinant (F-box protein, SFB). It has also been related to mutations outside the S-locus (Hegedus et al., 2012; Company et al., 2015). In apricot, self-compatibility has been related with the insertion of a 358-bp fragment in the S-haplotype-specific F-box (SFB) gene. This insertion has been reported in self-compatible Spanish (Vilanova et al., 2006) and Hungarian (Halász et al., 2007) cultivars and, since they only differ in two nucleotides in the intron region, a common origin for them has been suggested (Halász et al., 2007). Moreover, a detailed study on the S allele, a very common allele in Hungarian cultivars, suggests that S could derive from the S allele (Halász et al., 2007). Thus, the insertion of 358-bp in the SFB gene is only present in the S haplotype and both alleles can only be distinguished by primers designed based on the SFB sequence such as the degenerate primers AprSFB-F1/R (Halász et al., 2007) or, as in our case, by pollination experiments. The microscopy observations herein revealed self-compatibility in “Lorna” and “Palsteyn,” cultivars with the SS genotype, “Victor 1” with the genotype SS, and “Golden Sweet” with the allele S, but the S allele was not reported. A different mutation that is not linked to the S-locus has also been related to self-compatibility with a loss of pollen S-activity (Vilanova et al., 2006) and it has recently been associated with the M-locus (Zuriaga et al., 2013; Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017). Due to its limited distribution, it has been suggested that the M-locus would be in a very early stage of dispersion (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017). Interestingly, the S allele is generally found in cultivars with the m-haplotype suggesting that this could be the result of a relaxed constrain for self-compatible selection (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017). A similar S-genotype is also found in self-compatible “Katy,” in which the compatibility was associated to the M-locus (Zuriaga et al., 2013). A further analysis could reveal if self-compatibility in “Lorna,” “Palsteyn,” “Victor 1,” and “Golden Sweet” is also related to the M-locus. Studies on S-allele identification can also provide information on the genetic diversity of the species. Thus, Chinese cultivars are mostly self-incompatible with a higher number of S-alleles (Zhang et al., 2008) compared with the limited number of S-alleles found in Western countries (Halász et al., 2007). A study on genetic diversity using AFLP markers showed a decreasing genetic diversity of apricot cultivars from the former USSR to Southern Europe (Hagen et al., 2002; Halász et al., 2007), which is coherent with the Asian origin of the species. However, although most traditional European cultivars are self-compatible (Burgos et al., 1997), due to breeding and crosses with Asian cultivars, the number of self-incompatibility cultivars is recently increasing in Western countries (Muñoz-Sanz et al., 2017; Murathan et al., 2017) and our study confirms this trend. Moreover, our results also show six new incompatibility groups in addition to the initial 17 incompatibility groups described so far. Thus, the results obtained in this work using pollen tube growth observation in self-pollinated pistils, has allowed establishing the self-compatibility or self-incompatibility of 92 cultivars, including traditional and the main current cultivars as well as new cultivars from different breeding programs. S-RNase allele identification has allowed the allocation of a number of cultivars to their corresponding incompatibility groups, determining the incompatibility relationships between cultivars. The combination of these two complementary approaches results in valuable information for the appropriate selection of cultivars in commercial orchards and for the selection of parental genotypes in apricot breeding programs and a similar approach could be used in other woody perennial crops.

Author contributions

JR, JH, and MH: conceived the study; SH, JL, JR, JH, and MH: designed the experiments and wrote the paper; SH and JL performed the microscope observations, the PCR analysis, and analyzed the data; SH and JL contributed equally to this work.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  20 in total

1.  Developmental selection within the angiosperm style: using gamete DNA to visualize interspecific pollen competition.

Authors:  J H Williams; W E Friedman; M L Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Allele-specific PCR detection of sweet cherry self-incompatibility (S) alleles S1 to S16 using consensus and allele-specific primers.

Authors:  T Sonneveld; K R Tobutt; T P Robbins
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  A fluorescent brightener used for pollen tube identification in vivo.

Authors:  C J Jefferies; A R Belcher
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1974-07

4.  Detection and transcript expression of S-RNase gene associated with self-incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.).

Authors:  Jianrong Feng; Xuesen Chen; Yan Wu; Wen Liu; Qing Liang; Lijie Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Methylation of the S f locus in almond is associated with S-RNase loss of function.

Authors:  Angel Fernández i Martí; Thomas M Gradziel; Rafel Socias i Company
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Self-incompatibility (S) locus region of the mutated S6-haplotype of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) contains a functional pollen S allele and a non-functional pistil S allele.

Authors:  Hisayo Yamane; Kazuo Ikeda; Nathanael R Hauck; Amy F Iezzoni; Ryutaro Tao
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  A new self-compatibility haplotype in the sweet cherry 'Kronio', S5', attributable to a pollen-part mutation in the SFB gene.

Authors:  Annalisa Marchese; Radovan I Bosković; Tiziano Caruso; Antonio Raimondo; Marcello Cutuli; Kenneth R Tobutt
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Self-(in)compatibility in apricot germplasm is controlled by two major loci, S and M.

Authors:  Juan Vicente Muñoz-Sanz; Elena Zuriaga; Inmaculada López; María L Badenes; Carlos Romero
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  An S-locus independent pollen factor confers self-compatibility in 'Katy' apricot.

Authors:  Elena Zuriaga; Juan V Muñoz-Sanz; Laura Molina; Ana D Gisbert; María L Badenes; Carlos Romero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Self-(in)compatibility genotypes of Moroccan apricots indicate differences and similarities in the crop history of European and North African apricot germplasm.

Authors:  Ossama Kodad; Attila Hegedűs; Rafel Socias i Company; Júlia Halász
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genetic dissection of fruit maturity date in apricot (P. armeniaca L.) through a Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) approach.

Authors:  Irina Baccichet; Remo Chiozzotto; Davide Scaglione; Daniele Bassi; Laura Rossini; Marco Cirilli
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.547

2.  Gametophytic self-incompatibility in Andean capuli (Prunus serotina subsp. capuli): allelic diversity at the S-RNase locus influences normal pollen-tube formation during fertilization.

Authors:  Milton Gordillo-Romero; Lisa Correa-Baus; Verónica Baquero-Méndez; María de Lourdes Torres; Carlos Vintimilla; Jose Tobar; Andrés F Torres
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Elucidating Genetic Diversity in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cultivated in the North-Western Himalayan Provinces of India Using SSR Markers.

Authors:  Zahid Nabi Sheikh; Vikas Sharma; Rafiq Ahmad Shah; Shilpa Raina; Maha Aljabri; Javid Iqbal Mir; Naser AlKenani; Khalid Rehman Hakeem
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04

4.  Genetic Analysis of Prunus salicina L. by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Intersimple Sequence Repeat (ISSR).

Authors:  Jun Li; Guangchun Gao; Bin Li; Bai Li; Qihua Lu
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 1.375

5.  Self-Incompatibility in Apricot: Identifying Pollination Requirements to Optimize Fruit Production.

Authors:  Sara Herrera; Jorge Lora; José I Hormaza; Javier Rodrigo
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03

6.  Population genomics of apricots unravels domestication history and adaptive events.

Authors:  Alexis Groppi; Shuo Liu; Amandine Cornille; Stéphane Decroocq; Quynh Trang Bui; David Tricon; Corinne Cruaud; Sandrine Arribat; Caroline Belser; William Marande; Jérôme Salse; Cécile Huneau; Nathalie Rodde; Wassim Rhalloussi; Stéphane Cauet; Benjamin Istace; Erwan Denis; Sébastien Carrère; Jean-Marc Audergon; Guillaume Roch; Patrick Lambert; Tetyana Zhebentyayeva; Wei-Sheng Liu; Olivier Bouchez; Céline Lopez-Roques; Rémy-Félix Serre; Robert Debuchy; Joseph Tran; Patrick Wincker; Xilong Chen; Pierre Pétriacq; Aurélien Barre; Macha Nikolski; Jean-Marc Aury; Albert Glenn Abbott; Tatiana Giraud; Véronique Decroocq
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Identification of Self-Incompatibility Alleles by Specific PCR Analysis and S-RNase Sequencing in Apricot.

Authors:  Sara Herrera; Javier Rodrigo; José I Hormaza; Jorge Lora
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Self-(In)compatibility Systems: Target Traits for Crop-Production, Plant Breeding, and Biotechnology.

Authors:  Juan Vicente Muñoz-Sanz; Elena Zuriaga; Felipe Cruz-García; Bruce McClure; Carlos Romero
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Development of an HRMA-Based Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) Approach for Cost-Effective Genotyping of S and M Loci Controlling Self-Compatibility in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.).

Authors:  Bianca Maria Orlando Marchesano; Remo Chiozzotto; Irina Baccichet; Daniele Bassi; Marco Cirilli
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.