Literature DB >> 29754928

Pathological mechanisms of left main stent failure.

Hiroyoshi Mori1, Sho Torii1, Emanuel Harari1, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi1, Ryan Brauman1, Samantha Smith1, Robert Kutys1, David Fowler2, Maria Romero1, Renu Virmani1, Aloke V Finn3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (LM-PCI), there have been no pathological studies devoted to understanding the causes of LM stent failure. We aimed to systematically determine the pathological mechanisms of LM stent failure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From the CVPath Stent registry, a total of 46 lesions were identified to have LM-PCI. Pathologic stent failure (PSF) was defined as stent thrombosis, restenosis and in-stent chronic total occlusion (CTO). Failed and patent LM stented lesions were pathologically assessed to determine predictors of PSF. Malapposition and uncovered struts were numerically greater in the LM ostium, body, and bifurcation while neointimal thickness was relatively greater in bifurcation and proximal circumflex. In this study cohort, half of the lesions (n = 23) showed PSF. Stent thrombosis (ST, n = 18) was the major mode of PSF followed by in-stent CTO (n = 4) and restenosis (n = 1). Failed lesions showed significantly greater prevalence of malapposition >20% of struts/section (65% vs. 13%, P < 0.01), stent struts crossing an ostial side branch >30% of the circumference (48% vs. 13%, P < 0.01) and uncovered struts >30% (57% vs. 18%, P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, the prevalence of malapposition >20% was the strongest risk factor for PSF (Odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 1.8-45.4, P < 0.01) followed by struts crossing an ostial side branch >30% (Odds ratio 4.2, 95% confidence interval 0.8-24.7, P = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the main pathological predictors for LM stent failure are malapposition and struts crossing an ostial side branch and suggest that imaging-guided PCI may be important.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  And malapposition; Bifurcation; Left main; Stent; Thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754928     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  5 in total

Review 1.  Influences of Stent Design on In-Stent Restenosis and Major Cardiac Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omer Burak Istanbullu; Gulsen Akdogan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Vascular responses to coronary calcification following implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stents in humans: impact on healing.

Authors:  Sho Torii; Hiroyuki Jinnouchi; Atsushi Sakamoto; Hiroyoshi Mori; Joohyung Park; Falone C Amoa; Mariem Sawan; Yu Sato; Anne Cornelissen; Salome H Kuntz; Matthew Kutyna; Ka Hyun Paek; Raquel Fernandez; Ryan Braumann; Eric K Mont; Dipti Surve; Maria E Romero; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Hangover after Side Branch Stenting: The Discomfort Comes Afterwards.

Authors:  Rick Volleberg; Stijn van den Oord; Robert Jan Van Geuns
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Stent thrombosis in acute coronary syndromes: Patient-related factors and operator-related factors.

Authors:  Martin Kamenik; Petr Widimsky
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 5.  Efficacy of coronary imaging on bifurcation intervention.

Authors:  Kensuke Takagi; Ryoji Nagoshi; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Woong Kim; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Junya Shite; Yutaka Hikichi; Young Bin Song; Chang-Wook Nam; Bon-Kwon Koo; Soo-Joong Kim; Yoshinobu Murasato
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.