Gillian C Pet1, Ryan M McAdams2, Lilah Melzer3, Assaf P Oron4, Simon P Horslen5, Adam Goldin3, Patrick J Javid3. 1. Division of Neonatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: gilliancpet@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 3. Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 4. Children's Core for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA. 5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess providers' recommendations as to comfort care versus medical and surgical management in clinical scenarios of newborns with severe bowel loss and to assess how a variety of factors influence providers' decision making. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a survey of pediatric surgeons and neonatologists via the American Pediatric Surgical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. We examined how respondents' recommendations were affected by a variety of patient and provider factors. RESULTS: There were 288 neonatologists and 316 pediatric surgeons who responded. Irrespective of remaining bowel length, comfort care was recommended by 73% of providers for a premature infant with necrotizing enterocolitis and 54% for a full-term infant with midgut volvulus. The presence of comorbidities and earlier gestational age increased the proportion of providers recommending comfort care. Neonatologists were more likely to recommend comfort care than surgeons across all scenarios (OR, 1.45-2.00; P < .05), and this difference was more pronounced with infants born closer to term. In making these recommendations, neonatologists placed more importance on neurodevelopmental outcomes (P < .001), and surgeons emphasized experience with long-term quality of life (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Despite a contemporary survival of >90% in infants with intestinal failure, a majority of providers still recommend comfort care in infants with massive bowel loss. Significant differences were identified in clinical decision making between surgeons and neonatologists. These data reinforce the need for targeted education on long-term outcomes in intestinal failure to neonatal and surgical providers.
OBJECTIVES: To assess providers' recommendations as to comfort care versus medical and surgical management in clinical scenarios of newborns with severe bowel loss and to assess how a variety of factors influence providers' decision making. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a survey of pediatric surgeons and neonatologists via the American Pediatric Surgical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. We examined how respondents' recommendations were affected by a variety of patient and provider factors. RESULTS: There were 288 neonatologists and 316 pediatric surgeons who responded. Irrespective of remaining bowel length, comfort care was recommended by 73% of providers for a premature infant with necrotizing enterocolitis and 54% for a full-term infant with midgut volvulus. The presence of comorbidities and earlier gestational age increased the proportion of providers recommending comfort care. Neonatologists were more likely to recommend comfort care than surgeons across all scenarios (OR, 1.45-2.00; P < .05), and this difference was more pronounced with infants born closer to term. In making these recommendations, neonatologists placed more importance on neurodevelopmental outcomes (P < .001), and surgeons emphasized experience with long-term quality of life (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Despite a contemporary survival of >90% in infants with intestinal failure, a majority of providers still recommend comfort care in infants with massive bowel loss. Significant differences were identified in clinical decision making between surgeons and neonatologists. These data reinforce the need for targeted education on long-term outcomes in intestinal failure to neonatal and surgical providers.
Authors: T A Shah; J Meinzen-Derr; T Gratton; J Steichen; E F Donovan; K Yolton; B Alexander; V Narendran; K R Schibler Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Douglas E Kendrick; Barbara J Stoll; Betty R Vohr; Avroy A Fanaroff; Edward F Donovan; W Kenneth Poole; Martin L Blakely; Linda Wright; Rosemary Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Patrick M Chesley; Sabrina E Sanchez; Lilah Melzer; Assaf P Oron; Simon P Horslen; F Curt Bennett; Patrick J Javid Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Carol Oliveira; Nicole T de Silva; Sanja Stanojevic; Yaron Avitzur; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Wendy J Ungar; Jeffrey S Hoch; Paul W Wales Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sabrina E Sanchez; Jarod P McAteer; Adam B Goldin; Simon Horslen; Colleen E Huebner; Patrick J Javid Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: R Wadhawan; W Oh; S R Hintz; M L Blakely; A Das; E F Bell; S Saha; A R Laptook; S Shankaran; B J Stoll; M C Walsh; R D Higgins Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Kareem Abu-Elmagd; George Mazariegos; Sherif Armanyous; Neha Parekh; Ayat ElSherif; Ajai Khanna; Beverly Kosmach-Park; Giuseppe D'Amico; Masato Fujiki; Mohammed Osman; Marissa Scalish; Amanda Pruchnicki; Elizabeth Newhouse; Ahmed A Abdelshafy; Erick Remer; Guilherme Costa; R Matthew Walsh Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 12.969