Literature DB >> 29754812

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation.

William T Abraham1, Karl-Heinz Kuck2, Rochelle L Goldsmith3, JoAnn Lindenfeld4, Vivek Y Reddy5, Peter E Carson6, Douglas L Mann7, Benjamin Saville8, Helen Parise9, Rodrigo Chan10, Phi Wiegn11, Jeffrey L Hastings11, Andrew J Kaplan12, Frank Edelmann13, Lars Luthje13, Rami Kahwash14, Gery F Tomassoni15, David D Gutterman16, Angela Stagg17, Daniel Burkhoff18, Gerd Hasenfuß19.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to confirm a subgroup analysis of the prior FIX-HF-5 (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure) study showing that cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) improved exercise tolerance (ET) and quality of life in patients with ejection fractions between 25% and 45%.
BACKGROUND: CCM therapy for New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III and IV heart failure (HF) patients consists of nonexcitatory electrical signals delivered to the heart during the absolute refractory period.
METHODS: A total of 160 patients with NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms, QRS duration <130 ms, and ejection fraction ≥25% and ≤45% were randomized to continued medical therapy (control, n = 86) or CCM (treatment, n = 74, unblinded) for 24 weeks. Peak Vo2 (primary endpoint), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, NYHA functional class, and 6-min hall walk were measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Bayesian repeated measures linear modeling was used for the primary endpoint analysis with 30% borrowing from the FIX-HF-5 subgroup. Safety was assessed by the percentage of patients free of device-related adverse events with a pre-specified lower bound of 70%.
RESULTS: The difference in peak Vo2 between groups was 0.84 (95% Bayesian credible interval: 0.123 to 1.552) ml O2/kg/min, satisfying the primary endpoint. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p < 0.001), and 6-min hall walk (p = 0.02) were all better in the treatment versus control group. There were 7 device-related events, yielding a lower bound of 80% of patients free of events, satisfying the primary safety endpoint. The composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations was reduced from 10.8% to 2.9% (p = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: CCM is safe, improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in the specified group of HF patients, and leads to fewer HF hospitalizations. (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure; NCT01381172).
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QRS duration; exercise tolerance; heart failure; peak Vo(2); quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754812     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  25 in total

1.  Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction and with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  J Petutschnigg; F Edelmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Progress in heart failure treatment in Germany.

Authors:  Mark Luedde; Martina E Spehlmann; Norbert Frey
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  [Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction].

Authors:  Johannes Petutschnigg; Frank Edelmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.

Authors:  Albert K Feeny; John Rickard; Kevin M Trulock; Divyang Patel; Saleem Toro; Laurie Ann Moennich; Niraj Varma; Mark J Niebauer; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Richard A Grimm; John Barnard; Anant Madabhushi; Mina K Chung
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-14

Review 5.  [Cardiac contractility modulation for treatment of chronic heart failure].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; V Liebe; E Tülümen; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 6.  [Cardiac contractility modulation].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Current and Future Drug and Device Therapies for Pediatric Heart Failure Patients: Potential Lessons from Adult Trials.

Authors:  Bibhuti B Das; William B Moskowitz; Javed Butler
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 9.  Emerging Pharmacologic Therapies for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Ammar G Chaudhary; Fadi M Alreefi; Mohammad A Aziz
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 10.  Cardiac contractility modulation for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Peysh A Patel; Ramesh Nadarajah; Noman Ali; John Gierula; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.