Literature DB >> 29754702

Evaluating Renal Transplant Status Using Viscoelastic Response (VisR) Ultrasound.

Md Murad Hossain1, Mallory R Selzo2, Robert M Hinson3, Leslie M Baggesen4, Randal K Detwiler3, Wui K Chong5, Lauren M Burke5, Melissa C Caughey3, Melrose W Fisher1, Sonya B Whitehead5, Caterina M Gallippi6.   

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is most desirably and cost-effectively treated by renal transplantation, but graft survival is a major challenge. Although irreversible graft damage can be averted by timely treatment, intervention is delayed when early graft dysfunction goes undetected by standard clinical metrics. A more sensitive and specific parameter for delineating graft health could be the viscoelastic properties of the renal parenchyma, which are interrogated non-invasively by Viscoelastic Response (VisR) ultrasound, a new acoustic radiation force (ARF)-based imaging method. Assessing the performance of VisR imaging in delineating histologically confirmed renal transplant pathologies in vivo is the purpose of the study described here. VisR imaging was performed in patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 25) clinical indication for renal allograft biopsy. The median values of VisR outcome metrics (τ, relative elasticity [RE] and relative viscosity [RV]) were calculated in five regions of interest that were manually delineated in the parenchyma (outer, center and inner) and in the pelvis (outer and inner). The ratios of a given VisR metric for all possible region-of-interest combinations were calculated, and the corresponding ratios were statistically compared between biopsied patients subdivided by diagnostic categories versus non-biopsied, control allografts using the two-sample Wilcoxon test (p <0.05). Although τ ratios non-specifically differentiated allografts with vascular disease, tubular/interstitial scarring, chronic allograft nephropathy and glomerulonephritis from non-biopsied control allografts, RE distinguished only allografts with vascular disease and tubular/interstitial scarring, and RV distinguished only vascular disease. These results suggest that allografts with scarring and vascular disease can be identified using non-invasive VisR RE and RV metrics.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic radiation force impulse; Chronic kidney disease; Kidney transplant; Renal rejection; Ultrasound; Viscoelastic response (VisR); Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754702      PMCID: PMC6026561          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  47 in total

1.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Measuring of viscoelastic properties of homogeneous soft solid using transient elastography: an inverse problem approach.

Authors:  S Catheline; J L Gennisson; G Delon; M Fink; R Sinkus; S Abouelkaram; J Culioli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Amy C Sharma; Richard R Bouchard; Roger W Nightingale; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Identifying the mechanical properties of tissue by ultrasound strain imaging.

Authors:  Emre Turgay; Septimiu Salcudean; Robert Rohling
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Can protocol biopsy better inform our choices in renal transplantation?

Authors:  D Rush
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  Monitoring and managing graft health in the kidney transplant recipient.

Authors:  Michelle A Josephson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies.

Authors:  Fernando G Cosio; Joseph P Grande; Hani Wadei; Timothy S Larson; Matthew D Griffin; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Noninvasive evaluation of renal allograft fibrosis by transient elastography--a pilot study.

Authors:  Robert Arndt; Sven Schmidt; Christoph Loddenkemper; Maria Grünbaum; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet; Timm H Westhoff
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  Corticomedullary strain ratio: a quantitative marker for assessment of renal allograft cortical fibrosis.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Robert Min; James Hamilton; William Weitzel; Johnson Chen; Krishna Juluru; Jonathan M Rubin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Renal ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  N Grenier; J-L Gennisson; F Cornelis; Y Le Bras; L Couzi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.026

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  Novel Uses of Ultrasound to Assess Kidney Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Andrew D Rule; Thomas D Atwell; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Local Phase Velocity Based Imaging of Viscoelastic Phantoms and Tissues.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Feasibility of Harmonic Motion Imaging Using a Single Transducer: In Vivo Imaging of Breast Cancer in a Mouse Model and Human Subjects.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Niloufar Saharkhiz; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Electronic Point Spread Function Rotation Using a Three-Row Transducer for ARFI-Based Elastic Anisotropy Assessment: In Silico and Experimental Demonstration.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Renal Allograft Rejection: Noninvasive Ultrasound- and MRI-Based Diagnostics.

Authors:  Ulrich Jehn; Katharina Schuette-Nuetgen; Dominik Kentrup; Verena Hoerr; Stefan Reuter
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Viscoelastic Response Ultrasound Derived Relative Elasticity and Relative Viscosity Reflect True Elasticity and Viscosity: In Silico and Experimental Demonstration.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Mechanical Anisotropy Assessment in Kidney Cortex Using ARFI Peak Displacement: Preclinical Validation and Pilot In Vivo Clinical Results in Kidney Allografts.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Randal K Detwiler; Emily H Chang; Melissa C Caughey; Melrose W Fisher; Timothy C Nichols; Elizabeth P Merricks; Robin A Raymer; Margaret Whitford; Dwight A Bellinger; Lauren E Wimsey; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.725

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.