Literature DB >> 29754665

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale following cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Haris Riaz1, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan2, Aldo L Schenone1, Anam A Waheed3, Arooj Razzak Khan4, Richard A Krasuski5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after cryptogenic stroke has long been a contentious issue. Herein, we pool aggregate data examining safety and efficacy of transcatheter closure of PFO compared with medical therapy following initial cryptogenic stroke.
METHODS: We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compared device closure with medical management and reported on subsequent stroke and adverse events. Stroke was considered as the primary efficacy endpoint, whereas bleeding and atrial fibrillation were considered primary safety endpoints. Data were pooled by the random effects model and I2 was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS: A total of 5 RCT investigating 3630 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed that device closure compared to medical management was associated with a significant reduction in stroke (RR=0.3, 95% CI=0.02-0.57). There was, however, a significant increase in atrial arrhythmias with device therapy (RR=4.8, 95% CI=2.2-10.7). We found no increase in bleeding (RR=0.80, 95% CI=0.5-1.4), death (RR=0.76, 95% CI=0.3-1.99) or "any adverse events" (RR=1.02, 95% CI=0.85-1.23) with device therapy. Sub-group analysis revealed that device closure significantly reduced the incidence of the composite primary endpoint among patients who had moderate to large shunt sizes (RR=0.22, 95% CI=0.02-0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of stroke compared to medical management at the expense of an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754665     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Balakumar Swaminathan; Pablo Lavados; Mukul Sharma; Keith Muir; Roland Veltkamp; Sebastian F Ameriso; Matthias Endres; Helmi Lutsep; Steven R Messé; J David Spence; Krassen Nedeltechev; Kanjana Perera; Gustavo Santo; Veronica Olavarria; Arne Lindgren; Shrikant Bangdiwala; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Scott D Berkowitz; Hardi Mundl; Stuart J Connolly; Robert G Hart
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Updated Meta-analysis on the Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Reduction of Stroke Rates: the DEFENSE-PFO Trial Does not Change the Scenario.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Erik Everton Silva Vieira; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Roberto Gouveia Silva Diniz; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Alexandre Motta de Menezes; Ricardo Felipe de Albuquerque Lins; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

3.  Device closure for patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke: which patients should get it?

Authors:  Iris Parrini; Enrico Cecchi; Davide Forno; Alexander R Lyon; Riccardo Asteggiano
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 1.803

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.