Literature DB >> 29753915

The eyes reveal uncertainty about object distinctions in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

Andreia V Faria1, David Race2, Kevin Kim2, Argye E Hillis3.   

Abstract

At least three distinct variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) have been described, but they are difficult to distinguish early in the course, when individuals experience primarily anomia. People with svPPA are often the hardest to care for, because they have impaired comprehension of words and objects and often have negative changes in comportment. We sought to identify an early marker of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and to enhance the understanding of the semantic deficit in svPPA. We hypothesized that the pattern of eye tracking in a word picture matching task can differentiate svPPA from other variants and can predict which participants with unclassifiable PPA will progress to svPPA. We tested 19 individuals with PPA on a word picture matching task with eye tracking. We found that individuals with svPPA were less accurate than other variants when the foils were semantic coordinates (horse-cow) or schematically related (horse-saddle), but not when they were thematically related (saw-horse) or unrelated. Moreover, even in the condition in which they were highly accurate (unrelated foils) they looked much more often to the foils and for longer, than other variants or controls. Unclassifiable PPA participants who eventually developed svPPA showed the same pattern. This abnormal pattern was associated with atrophy in bilateral temporal poles.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye tracking; Primary progressive aphasia; Semantic dementia; Semantics; Temporal poles

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753915     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  5 in total

1.  A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.

Authors:  Cornelia van Scherpenberg; Rasha Abdel Rahman; Hellmuth Obrig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Eye movements as a measure of word comprehension deficits in primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers; Rob Hurley; Mustafa Seckin; Stacey Moeller; Nathan Gill; Hui Zhang; Christina Coventry; Matthew Nelson; Sandra Weintraub; Emily Rogalski; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; M-Marsel Mesulam; Emily J Rogalski; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Online sentence processing impairments in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Evidence from ERP.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Kaitlyn A Litcofsky; Matthew Walenski; Brianne Chiappetta; Marek-Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Eyetracking during picture naming predicts future vocabulary dropout in progressive anomia.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Maurice Flurie; Molly B Ungrady
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.