BACKGROUND: The hematologic response is critical in patients with light chain amyloidosis because a good response is known to improve organ response and overall survival. We present a retrospective analysis to compare the hematologic and organ response in patients who received bortezomib-based therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus those who received non-bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT and those who underwent ASCT at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of a total of 63 patients who underwent ASCT for light chain amyloidosis, 34 received bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT (Bor-ASCT) and 29 did not receive bortezomib therapy (non-Bor-ASCT). A greater number of patients had involvement of ≥ 3 organs and cardiac involvement in the Bor-ASCT group, suggesting a greater risk at baseline in the Bor-ASCT group. RESULTS: At 3, 6, and 12 months after ASCT, the hematologic response was better in the Bor-ASCT group, with a statistically significance difference at 6 months (partial response or better in 82% vs. 20%; P = .002) and 12 months (partial response or better in 76% vs. 33%; P = .02). Organ responses (66% vs. 21%; P < .001) and median overall survival (not reached vs. 53 months; P = .001) were also greater in the Bor-ASCT group. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT improves the hematologic response, organ response and overall survival, potentially by decreasing the light chain load before ASCT.
BACKGROUND: The hematologic response is critical in patients with light chain amyloidosis because a good response is known to improve organ response and overall survival. We present a retrospective analysis to compare the hematologic and organ response in patients who received bortezomib-based therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus those who received non-bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT and those who underwent ASCT at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of a total of 63 patients who underwent ASCT for light chain amyloidosis, 34 received bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT (Bor-ASCT) and 29 did not receive bortezomib therapy (non-Bor-ASCT). A greater number of patients had involvement of ≥ 3 organs and cardiac involvement in the Bor-ASCT group, suggesting a greater risk at baseline in the Bor-ASCT group. RESULTS: At 3, 6, and 12 months after ASCT, the hematologic response was better in the Bor-ASCT group, with a statistically significance difference at 6 months (partial response or better in 82% vs. 20%; P = .002) and 12 months (partial response or better in 76% vs. 33%; P = .02). Organ responses (66% vs. 21%; P < .001) and median overall survival (not reached vs. 53 months; P = .001) were also greater in the Bor-ASCT group. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that bortezomib-based therapy before ASCT improves the hematologic response, organ response and overall survival, potentially by decreasing the light chain load before ASCT.