Literature DB >> 29753504

Extracorporeal life support for adults with refractory septic shock.

Sun Kyun Ro1, Wan Kee Kim2, Ju Yong Lim2, Jae Suk Yoo3, Sang-Bum Hong4, Joon Bum Kim5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in shock patients is increasing worldwide, studies concerning this treatment for adult septic shock are limited. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of venoarterial ECMO in adult patients with septic shock refractory to conventional treatment.
METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive patients who presented with septic shock and underwent venoarterial ECMO were reviewed. Clinical parameters were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Weaning and survival outcomes of these patients were compared with the control group of 253 patients who received venoarterial ECMO for cardiogenic shock.
RESULTS: The mean age was 56.0 ± 12.3 years. Of the 71 septic shock patients, 11 (15.5%) were successfully weaned from ECMO after a median of 7.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 6.3-10.2] days, 5 of whom (7.0%) survived to discharge. Pre- and 6 hours post-procedural lactate levels were significantly higher in the nonsurvivors (11.6 [IQR, 7.5-15.0] vs 5.8 [IQR, 4.3-5.9], P = .036; 15.0 [IQR, 11.1-15.0] vs 5.2 [IQR, 4.7-5.4], P = .002). Rates of successful weaning from venoarterial ECMO (15.5% vs 45.5%), and of survival up to hospital discharge (7.0% vs 28.9%) were significantly lower in septic shock than in cardiogenic shock patients (n = 253; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of ECMO in refractory septic shock patients were poor with a very low probability of survival. This finding raises questions concerning the utility of applying ECMO for medically refractory septic shock. Elevated arterial lactate levels pre- and post-ECMO were associated with risk of in-hospital death. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate the results of this study.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; septic shock; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753504     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for refractory septic shock treated with VA ECMO.

Authors:  Lei Han; Yan Zhang; Yonghui Zhang; Wei Wu; Ping He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Severe Refractory Sepsis in the Setting of Relapsed Refractory Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Alyssa Stoner; Jenna O Miller; Terrie Flatt; Jessica S Wallisch
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults and Children With Refractory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yufan Yang; Zhenghui Xiao; Jiaotian Huang; Ling Gong; Xiulan Lu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Commentary: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Is it life-saving and cost effective for all patients?

Authors:  Harold L Lazar
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-03

5.  Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as mechanical circulatory support in adult septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Ruiyang Ling; Kollengode Ramanathan; Wynne Hsing Poon; Chuen Seng Tan; Nicolas Brechot; Daniel Brodie; Alain Combes; Graeme MacLaren
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.