Literature DB >> 29753344

Challenges in Research and Health Technology Assessment of Rare Disease Technologies: Report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group.

Sandra Nestler-Parr1, Daria Korchagina2, Mondher Toumi3, Chris L Pashos4, Christopher Blanchette5, Elizabeth Molsen6, Thomas Morel7, Steven Simoens7, Zoltán Kaló8, Ruediger Gatermann9, William Redekop10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful development of new treatments for rare diseases (RDs) and their sustainable patient access require overcoming a series of challenges related to research and health technology assessment (HTA). These impediments, which may be unique to RDs or also apply to common diseases but are particularly pertinent in RDs, are diverse and interrelated.
OBJECTIVE: To develop for the first time a catalog of primary impediments to RD research and HTA, and to describe the cause and effect of individual challenges.
METHODS: Challenges were identified by an international 22-person expert working group and qualitative outreach to colleagues with relevant expertise. A broad range of stakeholder perspectives is represented. Draft results were presented at annual European and North American International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) congresses, and written comments were received by the 385-strong ISPOR Rare Disease Review Group from two rounds of review. Findings were refined and confirmed via targeted literature search.
RESULTS: Research-related challenges linked to the low prevalence of RDs were categorized into those pertaining to disease recognition and diagnosis, evaluation of treatment effect, and patient recruitment for clinical research. HTA-related challenges were classified into issues relating to the lack of a tailored HTA method for RD treatments and uncertainty for HTA agencies and health care payers.
CONCLUSIONS: Identifying and highlighting diverse, but interrelated, key challenges in RD research and HTA is an essential first step toward developing implementable and sustainable solutions. A collaborative multistakeholder effort is required to enable faster and less costly development of safe, efficacious, and appropriate new RD therapies that offer value for money.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; health policy; health technology assessment; orphan designation; rare diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753344     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  19 in total

1.  Quantifying Downstream Healthcare Utilization in Studies of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Zoë P Mackay; Dmitry Dukhovny; Kathryn A Phillips; Alan H Beggs; Robert C Green; Richard B Parad; Kurt D Christensen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Importance of Patient Involvement in the Value Assessment Process: On the Way Towards Personalised Treatments.

Authors:  Nicole Gusset
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  The patient journey to diagnosis and treatment of congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency.

Authors:  Heather Smith; Beverly Romero; Emuella Flood; Anne Boney
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases.

Authors:  Lieven Annemans; Amr Makady
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products.

Authors:  Márta Szegedi; Tamás Zelei; Francis Arickx; Anna Bucsics; Emanuelle Cohn-Zanchetta; Jurij Fürst; Maria Kamusheva; Pawel Kawalec; Guenka Petrova; Juraj Slaby; Ewa Stawowczyk; Milan Vocelka; Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss; Zoltán Kaló; Mária Judit Molnár
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Howard L Kaufman; Michael B Atkins; Prasun Subedi; James Wu; James Chambers; T Joseph Mattingly; Jonathan D Campbell; Jeff Allen; Andrea E Ferris; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel Danielson; J Leonard Lichtenfeld; Linda House; Wendy K D Selig
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Are supplemental appraisal/reimbursement processes needed for rare disease treatments? An international comparison of country approaches.

Authors:  Elena Nicod; Amanda Whittal; Michael Drummond; Karen Facey
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Health-related quality of life in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Mónica Inês; Teresa Coelho; Isabel Conceição; Lara Ferreira; Mamede de Carvalho; João Costa
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Rare Diseases: Is the Future Brighter?

Authors:  Sandra Brasil; Carlota Pascoal; Rita Francisco; Vanessa Dos Reis Ferreira; Paula A Videira; And Gonçalo Valadão
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.