Literature DB >> 29753139

A review on fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization.

Nicholas A Chartrain1, Christopher B Williams1, Abby R Whittington2.   

Abstract

Vat Photopolymerization (stereolithography, SLA), an Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing technology, holds particular promise for the fabrication of tissue scaffolds for use in regenerative medicine. Unlike traditional tissue scaffold fabrication techniques, SLA is capable of fabricating designed scaffolds through the selective photopolymerization of a photopolymer resin on the micron scale. SLA offers unprecedented control over scaffold porosity and permeability, as well as pore size, shape, and interconnectivity. Perhaps even more significantly, SLA can be used to fabricate vascular networks that may encourage angio and vasculogenesis. Fulfilling this potential requires the development of new photopolymers, the incorporation of biochemical factors into printed scaffolds, and an understanding of the effects scaffold geometry have on cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation. This review compares SLA to other scaffold fabrication techniques, highlights significant advances in the field, and offers a perspective on the field's challenges and future directions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Engineering de novo tissues continues to be challenging due, in part, to our inability to fabricate complex tissue scaffolds that can support cell proliferation and encourage the formation of developed tissue. The goal of this review is to first introduce the reader to traditional and Additive Manufacturing scaffold fabrication techniques. The bulk of this review will then focus on apprising the reader of current research and provide a perspective on the promising use of vat photopolymerization (stereolithography, SLA) for the fabrication of complex tissue scaffolds.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Photopolymers; Regenerative medicine; Stereolithography; Tissue engineering; Tissue scaffolds

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753139     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  19 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Formulating and Processing Biomaterial Inks for Vat Polymerization-Based 3D Printing.

Authors:  Wanlu Li; Luis S Mille; Juan A Robledo; Tlalli Uribe; Valentin Huerta; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Meniscus regeneration by 3D printing technologies: Current advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Elena Stocco; Andrea Porzionato; Enrico De Rose; Silvia Barbon; Raffaele De Caro; Veronica Macchi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.813

4.  Biofabrication of 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yoontae Kim; Eun-Jin Lee; Albert V Davydov; Stanislav Frukhtbeyen; Jonathan E Seppala; Shozo Takagi; Laurence Chow; Stella Alimperti
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 5.  Tailoring the Interface of Biomaterials to Design Effective Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ludovica Parisi; Andrea Toffoli; Giulia Ghiacci; Guido M Macaluso
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-08-21

Review 6.  3D Printing of Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Muhammad Jamshaid Zafar; Dongbin Zhu; Zhengyan Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  A Novel Hybrid Additive Manufacturing Process for Drug Delivery Systems with Locally Incorporated Drug Depots.

Authors:  Jan Konasch; Alexander Riess; Robert Mau; Michael Teske; Natalia Rekowska; Thomas Eickner; Niels Grabow; Hermann Seitz
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 8.  In Vitro Strategies to Vascularize 3D Physiologically Relevant Models.

Authors:  Alessandra Dellaquila; Chau Le Bao; Didier Letourneur; Teresa Simon-Yarza
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 9.  Smart polymers for cell therapy and precision medicine.

Authors:  Hung-Jin Huang; Yu-Liang Tsai; Shih-Ho Lin; Shan-Hui Hsu
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 10.  Cellular Geometry Sensing at Different Length Scales and its Implications for Scaffold Design.

Authors:  Maike Werner; Nicholas A Kurniawan; Carlijn V C Bouten
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.