Jessica Baleiro Okado1, Juliana Sposto Avaca-Crusca1, Alexandre Lima Oliveira2, Andrei Nicoli Gebieluca Dabul1, Ilana Lopes Baratella da Cunha Camargo3. 1. São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, P.O. Box 369, 13569-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. 2. São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, P.O. Box 369, 13569-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil; Department of Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luiz km 235, 13565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. 3. São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, P.O. Box 369, 13569-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil; Department of Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luiz km 235, 13565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: ilanacamargo@ifsc.usp.br.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a threat to the success of clinical treatment. Besides high antimicrobial resistance rates, the presence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and heterogeneous daptomycin-non-susceptible S. aureus (hDNSSA) in the hospital environment is underestimated and is associated with treatment failure. The aim of this study was to investigate MRSA dissemination in a Brazilian hospital and to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment options in vitro. METHODS: MRSA strains were typed by MLST, PFGE and SCCmec typing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, teicoplanin, tetracycline, tigecycline, vancomycin and tedizolid were determined by broth microdilution. The presence of a heterogeneous population was detected by population analysis profile (PAP). Regarding hVISA and hDNSSA strains, the sequences and expression levels of genes involved in resistance to daptomycin and vancomycin were determined as well as cell wall thickness and autolysis. RESULTS: ST5/ST105-SCCmecII lineage was prevalent amongst 27 clinical MRSA characterised in this study. Two hDNSSA strains (one also hVISA) were detected and were confirmed by PAP. Isolate SCMSC29 (hVISA and hDNSSA) showed increased expression of genes involved in cell wall metabolism, slight cell wall thickening, reduction of autolysis, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the rpoB and mprF genes compared with the susceptible strain SCMSC31. SCMSC35 (hDNSSA) presented SNPs in the rpoB and mprF genes as well as a thickened cell wall. CONCLUSIONS: Despite this worrying and hard to detect phenotype, treatment alternatives such as teicoplanin, linezolid, tetracycline, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tedizolid were all active against these isolates.
OBJECTIVES: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a threat to the success of clinical treatment. Besides high antimicrobial resistance rates, the presence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and heterogeneous daptomycin-non-susceptible S. aureus (hDNSSA) in the hospital environment is underestimated and is associated with treatment failure. The aim of this study was to investigate MRSA dissemination in a Brazilian hospital and to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment options in vitro. METHODS: MRSA strains were typed by MLST, PFGE and SCCmec typing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, teicoplanin, tetracycline, tigecycline, vancomycin and tedizolid were determined by broth microdilution. The presence of a heterogeneous population was detected by population analysis profile (PAP). Regarding hVISA and hDNSSA strains, the sequences and expression levels of genes involved in resistance to daptomycin and vancomycin were determined as well as cell wall thickness and autolysis. RESULTS: ST5/ST105-SCCmecII lineage was prevalent amongst 27 clinical MRSA characterised in this study. Two hDNSSA strains (one also hVISA) were detected and were confirmed by PAP. Isolate SCMSC29 (hVISA and hDNSSA) showed increased expression of genes involved in cell wall metabolism, slight cell wall thickening, reduction of autolysis, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the rpoB and mprF genes compared with the susceptible strain SCMSC31. SCMSC35 (hDNSSA) presented SNPs in the rpoB and mprF genes as well as a thickened cell wall. CONCLUSIONS: Despite this worrying and hard to detect phenotype, treatment alternatives such as teicoplanin, linezolid, tetracycline, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tedizolid were all active against these isolates.