Literature DB >> 29752677

Insight into the mechanisms and consequences of recurrent telomere capture associated with a sub-telomeric deletion.

Alexsandro Dos Santos1, Francine Campagnari1, Ana Cristina Victorino Krepischi1, Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro Câmara2, Rita de Cássia E de Arruda Brasil2, Ligia Vieira1, Angela M Vianna-Morgante1, Paulo A Otto1, Peter L Pearson1, Carla Rosenberg3.   

Abstract

A complex mosaicism of the short arm of chromosome 1 detected by SNP microarray analysis is described in a patient presenting a 4-Mb 1p36 terminal deletion and associated phenotypic features. The array pattern of chromosome 1p displayed an intriguing increase in divergence of the SNP heterozygote frequency from the expected 50% from the centromere towards the 1p36 breakpoint. This suggests that various overlapping segments of UPD were derived by somatic recombination between the 1p homologues. The most likely explanation was the occurrence of a series of events initiated in either a gamete or an early embryonic cell division involving a 1pter deletion rapidly followed by multiple telomere captures, resulting in additive, stepped increases in frequency of homozygosity towards the telomere. The largest segment involved the entire 1p, and at least four other capture events were observed, indicating that at least five independent telomere captures occurred in separate cell lineages. The determination of breakpoint position by detection of abrupt changes in B-allele frequency using a moving window analysis demonstrated that they were identical in blood and saliva, the tissues available for analysis. We developed a model to explain the interaction of parameters determining the mosaic clones and concluded that, while number, size, and position of telomere captures were important initiating determinants, variation in individual clone frequencies was the main contributor to mosaic differences between tissues. All previous reports of telomere capture have been restricted to single events. Other cases involving multiple telomere capture probably exist but require investigation by SNP microarrays for their detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNP microarray; UPD; mosaicism; telomere capture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29752677     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-018-9578-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  24 in total

1.  Monosomy 1p36 breakpoint junctions suggest pre-meiotic breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are involved in generating terminal deletions.

Authors:  Blake C Ballif; Wei Yu; Chad A Shaw; Catherine D Kashork; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Molecular characterisation of a mosaicism with a complex chromosome rearrangement: evidence for coincident chromosome healing by telomere capture and neo-telomere formation.

Authors:  Elyes Chabchoub; Laura Rodríguez; Enrique Galán; Elena Mansilla; Maria Luisa Martínez-Fernandez; Maria Luisa Martínez-Frías; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Chromosome healing, telomere capture and mechanisms of radiation-induced chromosome breakage.

Authors:  P Slijepcevic; P E Bryant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  An isochore map of human chromosomes.

Authors:  Maria Costantini; Oliver Clay; Fabio Auletta; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Population data suggest that deletions of 1p36 are a relatively common chromosome abnormality.

Authors:  H A Heilstedt; B C Ballif; L A Howard; C D Kashork; L G Shaffer
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Clues to catastrophic telomere loss in mammals from yeast telomere rapid deletion.

Authors:  Arthur J Lustig
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Tandem repeats and G-rich sequences are enriched at human CNV breakpoints.

Authors:  Promita Bose; Karen E Hermetz; Karen N Conneely; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Molecular mechanisms generating and stabilizing terminal 22q13 deletions in 44 subjects with Phelan/McDermid syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Clara Bonaglia; Roberto Giorda; Silvana Beri; Cristina De Agostini; Francesca Novara; Marco Fichera; Lucia Grillo; Ornella Galesi; Annalisa Vetro; Roberto Ciccone; Maria Teresa Bonati; Sabrina Giglio; Renzo Guerrini; Sara Osimani; Susan Marelli; Claudio Zucca; Rita Grasso; Renato Borgatti; Elisa Mani; Cristina Motta; Massimo Molteni; Corrado Romano; Donatella Greco; Santina Reitano; Anna Baroncini; Elisabetta Lapi; Antonella Cecconi; Giulia Arrigo; Maria Grazia Patricelli; Chiara Pantaleoni; Stefano D'Arrigo; Daria Riva; Francesca Sciacca; Bernardo Dalla Bernardina; Leonardo Zoccante; Francesca Darra; Cristiano Termine; Emanuela Maserati; Stefania Bigoni; Emanuela Priolo; Armand Bottani; Stefania Gimelli; Frederique Bena; Alfredo Brusco; Eleonora di Gregorio; Irene Bagnasco; Ursula Giussani; Lucio Nitsch; Pierluigi Politi; Maria Luisa Martinez-Frias; Maria Luisa Martínez-Fernández; Nieves Martínez Guardia; Anna Bremer; Britt-Marie Anderlid; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Mapping insertions, deletions and SNPs on Venter's chromosomes.

Authors:  Maria Costantini; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Placental studies elucidate discrepancies between NIPT showing a structural chromosome aberration and a differently abnormal fetal karyotype.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Stefanie van Veen; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Joke Polak; Nicole van Koetsveld; Marjan Boter; Attie T J I Go; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Krista Prinsen; Lies H Hoefsloot; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Clinical significance and mechanisms associated with segmental UPD.

Authors:  Peter R Papenhausen; Carla A Kelly; Samuel Harris; Samantha Caldwell; Stuart Schwartz; Andrea Penton
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.