| Literature DB >> 29752609 |
Hua Zheng1,2, Rong-Jun Zhang3, Da-Hai Li1, Xin Chen4, Song-You Wang1, Yu-Xiang Zheng1, Meng-Jiao Li5, Zhi-Gao Hu5, Ning Dai2, Liang-Yao Chen1.
Abstract
The optical properties of aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) thin films were calculated rapidly and accurately by point-by-point analysis from spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) data. It was demonstrated that there were two different physical mechanisms, i.e., the interfacial effect and crystallinity, for the thickness-dependent permittivity in the visible and infrared regions. In addition, there was a blue shift for the effective plasma frequency of AZO when the thickness increased, and the effective plasma frequency did not exist for AZO ultrathin films (< 25 nm) in the infrared region, which demonstrated that AZO ultrathin films could not be used as a negative index metamaterial. Based on detailed permittivity research, we designed a near-perfect absorber at 2-5 μm by etching AZO-ZnO alternative layers. The alternative layers matched the phase of reflected light, and the void cylinder arrays extended the high absorption range. Moreover, the AZO absorber demonstrated feasibility and applicability on different substrates.Entities:
Keywords: Absorber; Aluminum-doped zinc oxide; Infrared; Spectroscopic ellipsometry
Year: 2018 PMID: 29752609 PMCID: PMC5948193 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2563-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Thickness of AZO films simulated by SE and measured by SEM, respectively
| Methods | 150 cycles | 300 cycles | 450 cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE (nm) | 26.0 | 50.3 | 75.6 |
| SEM (nm) | 24.8 | 47.3 | 75.4 |
Fig. 1Refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) were simulated by point-by-point analysis using the data from SE measurements
Fig. 2The band gap (Eg) of AZO films by linear extrapolation, where α is the absorption coefficient (α = 4πk/λ) and E is the photon energy
Fig. 3XRD patterns of the AZO thin films with different thicknesses
Fig. 4The real part and imaginary part of epsilon of AZO films with different thicknesses, which was calculated from n and k ()
Wavelength when the real part of epsilon of AZO thin films is zero in Fig. 4
| 150 cycles | 300 cycles | 450 cycles | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength (nm) | / | 2390 | 2204 |
| Effective plasma frequency (eV) | / | 0.519 | 0.563 |
Fig. 5a Reflection of AZO films on Si substrate; b Reflection, c absorption, and d transmittance of AZO films on SiO2 substrate
Fig. 6Extinction coefficient k of AZO, Au, and Ag ranges from 0.2 to 5.0 μm [33, 34]
Fig. 7The structure of void cylinder arrays on AZO/ZnO alternative layers. The radius of the void cylinder arrays is R μm, and the period is P μm. The thickness of 32 layers of AZO/ZnO alternative films is approximately 1.92 μm, each layer being 60 nm thick
Fig. 8Reflection and absorption of array A and array B
Parameters of arrays in Fig. 8
| Parameters | Radius (μm) | Period (μm) | The highest absorption |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array A | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.967 |
| Array B | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.941 |
High absorption band of arrays in Fig. 8
| Absorption band X (μm) | X1 = 0.8 | X2 = 0.9 | X3 = 0.9 | X4 = 0.8 | X4–X1 | X3–X2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Array A | 1.61 | 1.84 | 4.33 | > 5 | > 3.39 | 2.49 |
| Array B | 1.64 | 2.04 | > 5 | > 5 | > 3.36 | > 2.96 |
Fig. 9Absorption of array A with different substrates. The insert table shows the n and k of three substrates, respectively