Literature DB >> 29752237

Cross Comparison of Motor Unit Potential Features Used in EMG Signal Decomposition.

Mohsen Ghofrani Jahromi, Hossein Parsaei, Ali Zamani, Daniel W Stashuk.   

Abstract

Feature extraction is an important step of resolving an electromyographic (EMG) signal into its component motor unit potential trains, commonly known as EMG decomposition. Until now, different features have been used to represent motor unit potentials (MUPs) and improve decomposition processing time and accuracy, but a major limitation is that no systematic comparison of these features exists. In an EMG decomposition system, like any pattern recognition system, the features used for representing MUPs play an important role in the overall performance of the system. A cross comparison of the feature extraction methods used in EMG signal decomposition can assist in choosing the best features for representing MUPs and ultimately may improve EMG decomposition results. This paper presents a survey and cross comparison of these feature extraction methods. Decomposability index, classification accuracy of a -nearest neighbors classifier, and class-feature mutual information were employed for evaluating the discriminative power of various feature extraction techniques commonly used in the literature including time domain, morphological, frequency domain, and discrete wavelets. In terms of data, 45 simulated and 82 real EMG signals were used. Results showed that among time domain features, the first derivative of time samples exhibit the best separability. For morphological features, slope analysis provided the most discriminative power. Discrete Fourier transform coefficients offered the best separability among frequency domain features. However, neither morphological nor frequency domain techniques outperformed time domain features. The detail 4 coefficients in a discrete wavelets decomposition exceeded in evaluation measures when compared with other feature extraction techniques. Using principal component analysis slightly improved the results, but it is time consuming. Overall, considering computation time and discriminative ability, the first derivative of time samples might be efficient in representing MUPs in EMG decomposition and there is no need for sophisticated feature extraction methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29752237     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2817498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  3 in total

1.  Deep Unfolding of Iteratively Reweighted ADMM for Wireless RF Sensing.

Authors:  Udaya S K P Miriya Thanthrige; Peter Jung; Aydin Sezgin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  A Parallel Algorithm Framework for Feature Extraction of EEG Signals on MPI.

Authors:  Qi Xiong; Xinman Zhang; Wen-Feng Wang; Yuhong Gu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Can Wavelet Denoising Improve Motor Unit Potential Template Estimation?

Authors:  Hasanzadeh S H; Parsaei H; Movahedi M M
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-04-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.