Literature DB >> 29752195

Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of atrial functional mitral regurgitation in hospitalized heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.

Chihiro Saito1, Yuichiro Minami2, Kotaro Arai1, Shintaro Haruki1, Yoshimi Yagishita1, Kentaro Jujo1, Kyomi Ashihara1, Nobuhisa Hagiwara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) caused by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and tethering, termed ventricular functional MR (VFMR), is associated with worse outcomes. Atrial functional MR (AFMR) caused by left atrial enlargement and annular dilatation was also recently described in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the clinical profiles of AFMR in hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients are unclear. We investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of AFMR in hospitalized HF patients with AF.
METHODS: We analyzed 189 hospitalized HF patients with AF. The prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis were compared between 4 groups: patients with EF ≥50% and no/mild MR (pEFnoMR), patients with EF <50% and no/mild MR (rEFnoMR), patients with EF ≥50% and moderate/severe MR (AFMR), and patients with EF <50% and moderate/severe MR (VFMR).
RESULTS: The prevalence of AFMR was 15.9% in hospitalized HF patients with AF. AFMR patients were older and more likely to have an enlarged left atrium, lower tenting height, and moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation than VFMR patients. There were no differences in all-cause death after discharge among pEFnoMR, rEFnoMR, and AFMR patients. AFMR patients were associated with a higher rate of a composite of cardiac death and readmission for HF compared with pEFnoMR and rEFnoMR patients (log-rank p=0.046 and p=0.004). There were no differences in composite endpoints between AFMR and VFMR patients (log-rank p=0.507).
CONCLUSIONS: AFMR was present in a proportion of elderly hospitalized HF patients with AF, and was a condition requiring attention because of readmission for HF in a hospitalized HF cohort.
Copyright © 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Heart failure; Left atrium; Mitral regurgitation; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29752195     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Functional mitral regurgitation, updated: ventricular or atrial?

Authors:  Yukio Abe; Yosuke Takahashi; Toshihiko Shibata
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 2.  Atrial Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation: Sex Matters. A Call for Action to Unravel the Differences Between Women and Men.

Authors:  Francisco Gual-Capllonch; José Ignacio Sáenz de Ibarra; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Prognostic comparison of atrial and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Chisato Okamoto; Atsushi Okada; Kunihiro Nishimura; Kenji Moriuchi; Masashi Amano; Hiroyuki Takahama; Makoto Amaki; Takuya Hasegawa; Hideaki Kanzaki; Tomoyuki Fujita; Junjiro Kobayashi; Satoshi Yasuda; Chisato Izumi
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-02

4.  Influence of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on atrial and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Masaharu Masuda; Kimiko Sekiya; Mitsutoshi Asai; Osamu Iida; Shin Okamoto; Takayuki Ishihara; Kiyonori Nanto; Takashi Kanda; Takuya Tsujimura; Yasuhiro Matsuda; Yosuke Hata; Hiroyuki Uematsu; Taku Toyoshima; Naoko Higashino; Toshiaki Mano
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Secondary mitral regurgitation: reducing the leak, expanding the science.

Authors:  Sam Straw; Dominik Schlosshan; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-10-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.